Estimating spatial distributions is important in data analysis, such as traffic flow forecasting and epidemic prevention. To achieve accurate spatial distribution estimation, the analysis needs to collect sufficient user data. However, collecting data directly from individuals could compromise their privacy. Most previous works focused on private distribution estimation for one-dimensional data, which does not consider spatial data relation and leads to poor accuracy for spatial distribution estimation. In this paper, we address the problem of private spatial distribution estimation, where we collect spatial data from individuals and aim to minimize the distance between the actual distribution and estimated one under Local Differential Privacy (LDP). To leverage the numerical nature of the domain, we project spatial data and its relationships onto a one-dimensional distribution. We then use this projection to estimate the overall spatial distribution. Specifically, we propose a reporting mechanism called Disk Area Mechanism (DAM), which projects the spatial domain onto a line and optimizes the estimation using the sliced Wasserstein distance. Through extensive experiments, we show the effectiveness of our DAM approach on both real and synthetic data sets, compared with the state-of-the-art methods, such as Multi-dimensional Square Wave Mechanism (MDSW) and Subset Exponential Mechanism with Geo-I (SEM-Geo-I). Our results show that our DAM always performs better than MDSW and is better than SEM-Geo-I when the data granularity is fine enough.

Streaming data collection is indispensable for stream data analysis, such as event monitoring. However, publishing these data directly leads to privacy leaks. w -event privacy is a valuable tool to protect individual privacy within a given time window while maintaining high accuracy in data collection. Most existing w -event privacy studies on infinite data stream only focus on homogeneous privacy requirements for all users. In this paper, we propose personalized w -event privacy protection that allows different users to have different privacy requirements in private data stream estimation. Specifically, we design a mechanism that allows users to maintain constant privacy requirements at each time slot, namely Personalized Window Size Mechanism (PWSM). Then, we propose two solutions to accurately estimate stream data statistics while achieving w -Event є -Personalized Differential Privacy (( w,є )-EPDP), namely Personalized Budget Distribution (PBD) and Personalized Budget Absorption (PBA). PBD always provides at least the same privacy budget for the next time step as the amount consumed in the previous release. PBA fully absorbs the privacy budget from the previous k time slots, while also borrowing from the privacy budget of the next k time slots, to increase the privacy budget for the current time slot. We prove that both PBD and PBA outperform the state-of-the-art private stream estimation methods while satisfying the privacy requirements of all users. We demonstrate the efficiency and effectiveness of our PBD and PBA on both real and synthetic datasets, compared with the recent uniformity w -event approaches, Budget Distribution (BD) and Budget Absorption (BA). Our PBD achieves 68% less error than BD on average on real datasets. Besides, our PBA achieves 24.9% less error than BA on average on synthetic datasets.

Data collection is indispensable for spatial crowd-sourcing services, such as resource allocation, policymaking, and scientific explorations. However, privacy issues make it challenging for users to share their information unless receiving sufficient compensation. Differential Privacy (DP) is a promising mechanism to release helpful information while protecting individuals’ privacy. However, most DP mechanisms only consider a fixed compensation for each user’s privacy loss. In this paper, we design a task assignment scheme that allows workers to dynamically improve their utility with dynamic distance privacy leakage. Specifically, we propose two solutions to improve the total utility of task assignment results, namely Private Utility Conflict-Elimination (PUCE) approach and Private Game Theory (PGT) approach, respectively. We prove that PUCE achieves higher utility than the state-of-the-art works. We demonstrate the efficiency and effectiveness of our PUCE and PGT approaches on both real and synthetic data sets compared with the recent distance-based approach, Private Distance Conflict-Elimination (PDCE). PUCE is always better than PDCE slightly. PGT is 50% to 63% faster than PDCE and can improve 16% utility on average when worker range is large enough.