We present MOSS, a multi-objective optimization framework for constructing stable sets of decision rules.MOSS incorporates three important criteria for interpretability: sparsity, accuracy, and stability, into a single multi-objective optimization framework.Importantly, MOSS allows a practitioner to rapidly evaluate the trade-o between accuracy and stability in sparse rule sets in order to select an appropriate model.We develop a specialized cutting plane algorithm in our framework to rapidly compute the Pareto frontier between these two objectives, and our algorithm scales to problem instances beyond the capabilities of commercial optimization solvers.Our experiments show that MOSS outperforms state-ofthe-art rule ensembles in terms of both predictive performance and stability.

We present FAST, an optimization framework for fast additive segmentation.FAST segments piecewise constant shape functions for each feature in a dataset to produce transparent additive models.The framework leverages a novel optimization procedure to fit these models ∼2 orders of magnitude faster than existing state-of-the-art methods, such as explainable boosting machines [20].We also develop new feature selection algorithms in the FAST framework to fit parsimonious models that perform well.Through experiments and case studies, we show that FAST improves the computational efficiency and interpretability of additive models.

We present FIRE, Fast Interpretable Rule Extraction, an optimization-based framework to extract a small but useful collection of decision rules from tree ensembles. FIRE selects sparse representative subsets of rules from tree ensembles, that are easy for a practitioner to examine. To further enhance the interpretability of the extracted model, FIRE encourages fusing rules during selection, so that many of the selected decision rules share common antecedents. The optimization framework utilizes a fusion regularization penalty to accomplish this, along with a non-convex sparsity-inducing penalty to aggressively select rules. Optimization problems in FIRE pose a challenge to off-the-shelf solvers due to problem scale and the non-convexity of the penalties. To address this, making use of problem-structure, we develop a specialized solver based on block coordinate descent principles; our solver performs up to 40x faster than existing solvers. We show in our experiments that FIRE outperforms state-of-the-art rule ensemble algorithms at building sparse rule sets, and can deliver more interpretable models compared to existing methods.