The Neo4j query language Cypher enables efficient querying for graphs and has become the most popular graph database language. Due to its complexities, semantic parsing (similar to Text-to-SQL) that translates natural language queries to Cypher becomes highly desirable. We propose the first Text-to-CQL dataset, SpCQL, which contains one Neo4j graph database, 10,000 manually annotated natural language queries and the matching Cypher queries (CQL). Correspondingly, based on this dataset, we define a new semantic parsing task Text-to-CQL. The Text-to-CQL task differs from the traditional Text-to-SQL task due to CQL being more flexible and versatile, especially for schema queries, which brings precedented challenges for the translation process. Although current SOTA Text-to-SQL models utilize SQL schema and contents, they do not scale up to large-scale graph databases. Besides, due to the absence of the primary and foreign keys in Cypher, which are essential for the multi-table Text-to-SQL task, existing Text-to-SQL models are rendered ineffective in this new task and have to be adapted to work. We propose three baselines based on the Seq2Seq framework and conduct experiments on the SpCQL dataset. The experiments yield undesirable results for existing models, hence pressing for subsequent research that considers the characteristics of SQL. The dataset is available at https://github.com/Guoaibo/Text-to-CQL.

Current question answering systems are insufficient when confronting real-life scenarios, as they can hardly be aware of whether a question is answerable given its context. Hence, there is a recent pursuit of unanswerability of a question and its attribution. Attribution of unanswerability requires the system to choose an appropriate cause for an unanswerable question. As the task is sophisticated for even human beings, it is expensive to acquire labeled data, which makes it a low-data regime problem. Moreover, the causes themselves are semantically abstract and complex, and the process of attribution is heavily question- and context-dependent. Thus, a capable model has to carefully appreciate the causes, and then, judiciously contrast the question with its context, in order to cast it into the right cause. In response to the challenges, we present PTAU, which refers to and implements a high-level human reading strategy such that one reads with anticipation. In specific, PTAU leverages the recent prompt-tuning paradigm, and is further enhanced with two innovatively conceived modules: 1) a cause-oriented template module that constructs continuous templates towards certain attributing class in high dimensional vector space; and 2) a semantics-aware label module that exploits label semantics through contrastive learning to render the classes distinguishable. Extensive experiments demonstrate that the proposed design better enlightens not only the attribution model, but also current question answering models, leading to superior performance.

Abstract Entity alignment (EA) aims to discover the equivalent entities in different knowledge graphs (KGs). It is a pivotal step for integrating KGs to increase knowledge coverage and quality. Recent years have witnessed a rapid increase of EA frameworks. However, state-of-the-art solutions tend to rely on labeled data for model training. Additionally, they work under the closed-domain setting and cannot deal with entities that are unmatchable. To address these deficiencies, we offer an unsupervised framework that performs entity alignment in the open world. Specifically, we first mine useful features from the side information of KGs. Then, we devise an unmatchable entity prediction module to filter out unmatchable entities and produce preliminary alignment results. These preliminary results are regarded as the pseudo-labeled data and forwarded to the progressive learning framework to generate structural representations, which are integrated with the side information to provide a more comprehensive view for alignment. Finally, the progressive learning framework gradually improves the quality of structural embeddings and enhances the alignment performance. Furthermore, noticing that the pseudo-labeled data are of various qualities, we introduce the concept of confidence to measure the probability of an entity pair of being true and develop a confidence-based unsupervised EA framework . Our solutions do not require labeled data and can effectively filter out unmatchable entities. Comprehensive experimental evaluations validate the superiority of our proposals .

Retrieving event instances from texts is pivotal to various natural language processing applications (e.g., automatic question answering and dialogue systems), and the first task to perform is event detection. There are two related sub-tasks therein-trigger identification and type classification, and the former is considered to play a dominant role. Nevertheless, it is notoriously challenging to predict event triggers right. To handle the task, existing work has made tremendous progress by incorporating manual features, data augmentation and neural networks, etc. Due to the scarcity of data and insufficient representation of trigger words, however, they still fail to precisely determine the spans of triggers (coined as trigger span detection problem). To address the challenge, we propose to learn discriminative neural representations (DNR) from texts. Specifically, our DNR model tackles the trigger span detection problem by exploiting two novel techniques: 1) a contrastive learning strategy, which enlarges the discrepancy between representations of words inside and outside triggers; and 2) a Mixspan strategy, which better trains the model to differentiate words nearby triggers' span boundaries. Extensive experiments on benchmarks-ACE2005 and TAC2015-demonstrate the superiority of our DNR model, leading to state-of-the-art performance.

In e-commerce, opinion tags refer to a ranked list of tags provided by the e-commerce platform that reflect characteristics of reviews of an item. To assist consumers to quickly grasp a large number of reviews about an item, opinion tags are increasingly being applied by e-commerce platforms. Current mechanisms for generating opinion tags rely on either manual labelling or heuristic methods, which is time-consuming and ineffective. In this paper, we propose the abstractive opinion tagging task, where systems have to automatically generate a ranked list of opinion tags that are based on, but need not occur in, a given set of user-generated reviews. The abstractive opinion tagging task comes with three main challenges: the noisy nature of reviews; the formal nature of opinion tags vs. the colloquial language usage in reviews; and the need to distinguish between different items with very similar aspects. To address these challenges, we propose an abstractive opinion tagging framework, named AOT-Net, to generate a ranked list of opinion tags given a large number of reviews. First, a sentence-level salience estimation component estimates each review's salience score. Next, a review clustering and ranking component ranks reviews in two steps: first, reviews are grouped into clusters and ranked by cluster size; then, reviews within each cluster are ranked by their distance to the cluster center. Finally, given the ranked reviews, a rank-aware opinion tagging component incorporates an alignment feature and alignment loss to generate a ranked list of opinion tags. To facilitate the study of this task, we create and release a large-scale dataset, called eComTag, crawled from real-world e-commerce websites. Extensive experiments conducted on the eComTag dataset verify the effectiveness of the proposed AOT-Net in terms of various evaluation metrics.

\emphSeasonal periodicity is a frequent phenomenon for social interactions in temporal networks. A key property of this behavior is that it exhibits periodicity for multiple particular periods in temporal networks. Mining such seasonal-periodic patterns is significant since it can indicate interesting relationships between the individuals involved in the interactions. Unfortunately, most previous studies for periodic pattern mining ignore the seasonal feature. This motivates us to explore mining seasonal-periodic subgraphs, and the investigation presents a novel model, called maximal σ-periodic $ømega$-seasonal k-subgraph. It represents a subgraph with size larger than k and that appears at least σ times periodically in at least $ømega$ particular periods on the temporal graph. Since seasonal-periodic patterns do not satisfy the anti-monotonic property, we propose a weak version of support measure with an anti-monotonic property to reduce the search space efficiently. Then, we present an effective mining algorithm to seek all maximal σ-periodic $ømega$-seasonal k-subgraphs. Experimental results on real-life datasets show the effectiveness and efficiency of our approach.

Academic search engines have been widely used to access academic papers, where users’ information needs are explicitly represented as search queries. Some modern recommender systems have taken one step further by predicting users’ information needs without the presence of an explicit query. In this article, we examine an academic paper recommender that sends out paper recommendations in email newsletters, based on the users’ browsing history on the academic search engine. Specifically, we look at users who regularly browse papers on the search engine, and we sign up for the recommendation newsletters for the first time. We address the task of reranking the recommendation candidates that are generated by a production system for such users. We face the challenge that the users on whom we focus have not interacted with the recommender system before, which is a common scenario that every recommender system encounters when new users sign up. We propose an approach to reranking candidate recommendations that utilizes both paper content and user behavior. The approach is designed to suit the characteristics unique to our academic recommendation setting. For instance, content similarity measures can be used to find the closest match between candidate recommendations and the papers previously browsed by the user. To this end, we use a knowledge graph derived from paper metadata to compare entity similarities (papers, authors, and journals) in the embedding space. Since the users on whom we focus have no prior interactions with the recommender system, we propose a model to learn a mapping from users’ browsed articles to user clicks on the recommendations. We combine both content and behavior into a hybrid reranking model that outperforms the production baseline significantly, providing a relative 13% increase in Mean Average Precision and 28% in Precision@1. Moreover, we provide a detailed analysis of the model components, highlighting where the performance boost comes from. The obtained insights reveal useful components for the reranking process and can be generalized to other academic recommendation settings as well, such as the utility of graph embedding similarity. Also, recent papers browsed by users provide stronger evidence for recommendation than historical ones.