EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Jing Huang 0016
dblp:14/4834-16
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers in the field
1as first author
4since 2021 · last 2023
0000-0002-6357-7443ORCID · conflict
Domains — venue-derived; a paper can count in several
Knowledge Engineering, Semantic Web & Information Systems · 3 (1 first)Other / Interdisciplinary · 1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Deriving priorities from the fuzzy best-worst method matrix and its applications: A perspective of incomplete reciprocal preference relation
Jing Huang 0016, Yejun Xu, Xiaowei Wen, Xiaotong Zhu, Enrique Herrera-Viedma |
Inf. Sci. | 1 |
| 2023 | Corrigendum to "Some models to manage additive consistency and derive priority weights from hesitant fuzzy preference relations" [Inform. Sci. 586 (2022) 450-467]
Yejun Xu, Weijia Dai, Jing Huang 0016, Enrique Herrera-Viedma |
Inf. Sci. | 3 |
| 2022 | Some models to manage additive consistency and derive priority weights from hesitant fuzzy preference relations
Yejun Xu, Weijia Dai, Jing Huang 0016, Enrique Herrera-Viedma |
Inf. Sci. | 3 |
| 2021 | A consensus model for group decision making with self-confident linguistic preference relationsabstractPreference relation has been one of the most useful tools for experts to express their comparison information over alternatives in group decision-making (GDM) problems. Recently, a new type of preference relations called linguistic preference relations with self-confidence (LPRs-SC) has been proposed, which makes multiple self-confidence levels into consideration when experts provide their preferences. This study focuses on the consensus reaching process for GDM with LPRs-SC. To do that, some new operational laws for LPRs-SC are presented. Subsequently, an iteration-based consensus proposal for LPRs-SC is proposed. In the proposal, we aggregate the individual LPRs-SC using a self-confidence indices-based method which gives more importance to the most self-confident experts. A self-confidence score function is presented to derive the individual and collective priority vectors. Moreover, considering experts’ acceptable adjustment range of preference values, a two-step feedback adjustment mechanism is utilized to improve the consensus level, which adjusts both the preference values and the self-confidence levels. Finally, an example and some analyses are furnished to demonstrate the feasibility and effectiveness of the proposed method. Shennan Zhu, Jing Huang 0016, Yejun Xu |
Int. J. Intell. Syst. | 2 |