Spatial heterogeneity and correlation are two primary geographical effects of spatial data. Geographically weighted regression (GWR) and its extensions were proposed to quantitively analyze the heterogeneous features in data relationships. An integrative distance metric is usually adopted to calculate proximity-based weights for model calibration for these techniques. However, it could be defective when dealing with higher dimensional data, eg spatio-temporal data (3-D), and geographical flow data (4-D). This study proposes a new local model, namely geographical and temporal density regression (GTDR), to deal with objects of flexible dimensions by reconsidering the spatial weights and experimental investigation of GWR. We use a Nelder-Mead algorithm to optimize each kernel function’s bandwidth for every dimension. To validate its performance, we conduct three sets of simulation experiments with 2-D, 3-D, and 4-D data, respectively, and compare them to conventional techniques. Results indicate the apparent advantages of GTDR in treating each dimension individually instead of calculating an integrative distance in traditional ways, such as spatio-temporal or flow distances. All in all, the GTDR technique shows a promising ability in fitting data with higher and diverse dimensions, and exploring heterogeneities in temporal, spatial, spatio-temporal or more complex structural data relationships.

Geographically weighted regression (GWR) and its extensions are important local modelling techniques for exploring spatial heterogeneity in regression relationships. However, when dealing with spatial data of overlapping samples – for example, when precise locational information is aggregated to a shared neighbourhood to avoid revealing the addresses of individual survey respondents – GWR-based models can encounter several problems, including obtaining reliable bandwidths. Because data with this characteristic exhibit spatial hierarchical structures, we propose combining hierarchical linear modelling (HLM) with GWR to give a hierarchical and geographically weighted regression (HGWR) model that divides coefficients into sample-level fixed effects, group-level fixed effects, sample-level random effects, and group-level spatially weighted effects. This paper presents a back-fitting likelihood estimator to fit the model, a simulation experiment that suggests that HGWR is better able to capture these effects and the spatial heterogeneity within them than are traditional HLM or GWR models, and a case study looking at predictors of housing price in Beijing, China. The ability of HGWR to tackle both spatial and group-level heterogeneity simultaneously suggests its potential as a promising data modelling tool for handling spatio-temporal big data with spatially hierarchical structures.

Although geographically weighted Poisson regression (GWPR) is a popular regression for spatially indexed count data, its development is relatively limited compared to that found for linear geographically weighted regression (GWR), where many extensions (e.g. multiscale GWR, scalable GWR) have been proposed. The weak development of GWPR can be attributed to the computational cost and identification problem in the underpinning Poisson regression model. This study proposes linearized GWPR (L-GWPR) by introducing a log-linear approximation into the GWPR model to overcome these bottlenecks. Because the L-GWPR model is identical to the Gaussian GWR model, it is free from the identification problem, easily implemented, computationally efficient, and offers similar potential for extension. Specifically, L-GWPR does not require a double-loop algorithm, which makes GWPR slow for large samples. Furthermore, we extended L-GWPR by introducing ridge regularization to enhance its stability (regularized L-GWPR). The results of the Monte Carlo experiments confirmed that regularized L-GWPR estimates local coefficients accurately and computationally efficiently. Finally, we compared GWPR and regularized L-GWPR through a crime analysis in Tokyo.

The Geographical Detector Model (GDM) is a popular statistical toolkit for geographical attribution analysis. Despite the striking resemblance of the q-statistic in GDM to the R-squared in linear regression models, their explicit connection has not yet been established. This study proves that the q-statistic reduces into the R-squared under a linear regression framework. Under linear regression and moderate-to-strong spatial autocorrelation, Monte Carlo simulation results show that the GDM tends to underestimate the importance of variables. In addition, an almost perfect power law relationship is present between the percentage bias and the degree of the spatial autocorrelations, indicating the presence of fast uplifting bias in response to increasing levels of spatial autocorrelations. We propose an integrated approach for variable importance quantification by bringing together the spatial econometrics model and the game theory based-Shapley value method. By applying our proposed methodology to a case study of land desertification in African, it is found human activity tends to affect land desertification both directly and indirectly. However, such effects appear to be underestimated or undistinguished in the classic GDM.

In this article, we respond to ‘A comment on geographically weighted regression with parameter-specific distance metrics’ by Oshan et al. (2019), published in this journal, where several concerns on the parameter-specific distance metric geographically weighted regression (PSDM GWR) technique are raised. In doing so, we review the developmental timeline of the multiscale geographically weighed regression modelling framework with related and equivalent models, including flexible bandwidth GWR, conditional GWR and PSDM GWR. In our response, we have tried to answer all the concerns raised in terms of applicability, veracity, interpretability and computational efficiency of the PSDM GWR model.

Geographically weighted regression (GWR) is an important local technique to model spatially varying relationships. A single distance metric (Euclidean or non-Euclidean) is generally used to calibrate a standard GWR model. However, variations in spatial relationships within a GWR model might also vary in intensity with respect to location and direction. This assertion has led to extensions of the standard GWR model to mixed (or semiparametric)GWR and to flexible bandwidth GWR models. In this article, we present a strongly related extension in fitting a GWR model with parameter-specific distance metrics (PSDM GWR). As with mixed and flexible bandwidth GWR models, a back-fitting algorithm is used for the calibration of the PSDM GWR model. The value of this new GWR model is demonstrated using a London house price data set as a case study. The results indicate that the PSDM GWR model can clearly improve the model calibration in terms of both goodness of fit and prediction accuracy, in contrast to the model fits when only one metric is singly used. Moreover, the PSDM GWR model provides added value in understanding how a regression model’s relationships may vary at different spatial scales, according to the bandwidths and distance metrics selected. PSDM GWR deals with spatial heterogeneities in data relationships in a general way, although questions remain on its model diagnostics, distance metric specification, and computational efficiency, providing options for further research.

In this study, the geographically weighted regression (GWR) model is adapted to benefit from a broad range of distance metrics, where it is demonstrated that a well-chosen distance metric can improve model performance. How to choose or define such a distance metric is key, and in this respect, a ‘Minkowski approach’ is proposed that enables the selection of an optimum distance metric for a given GWR model. This approach is evaluated within a simulation experiment consisting of three scenarios. The results are twofold: (1) a well-chosen distance metric can significantly improve the predictive accuracy of a GWR model; and (2) the approach allows a good approximation of the underlying ‘optimal distance metric’, which is considered useful when the ‘true’ distance metric is unknown.

Geographically weighted regression (GWR) is an important local technique for exploring spatial heterogeneity in data relationships. In fitting with Tobler’s first law of geography, each local regression of GWR is estimated with data whose influence decays with distance, distances that are commonly defined as straight line or Euclidean. However, the complexity of our real world ensures that the scope of possible distance metrics is far larger than the traditional Euclidean choice. Thus in this article, the GWR model is investigated by applying it with alternative, non-Euclidean distance (non-ED) metrics. Here we use as a case study, a London house price data set coupled with hedonic independent variables, where GWR models are calibrated with Euclidean distance (ED), road network distance and travel time metrics. The results indicate that GWR calibrated with a non-Euclidean metric can not only improve model fit, but also provide additional and useful insights into the nature of varying relationships within the house price data set.