Traditional conversational travel recommender systems primarily optimize for user relevance and convenience, often reinforcing popular, overcrowded destinations and carbon-intensive travel choices. To address this, we present TRACE (Tourism Recommendation with Agentic Counterfactual Explanations), a multi-agent, LLM-based framework that promotes sustainable tourism through interactive nudging. TRACE uses a modular orchestrator-worker architecture where specialized agents elicit latent sustainability preferences, construct structured user personas, and generate recommendations that balance relevance with environmental impact. A key innovation lies in its use of agentic counterfactual explanations and LLM-driven clarifying questions, which together surface greener alternatives and refine understanding of intent, fostering user reflection without coercion. User studies and semantic alignment analyses demonstrate that TRACE effectively supports sustainable decision-making while preserving recommendation quality and interactive responsiveness. TRACE is implemented on Google's Agent Development Kit, with full code, Docker setup, prompts, and a publicly available demo video to ensure reproducibility. A project summary, including all resources, prompts, and demo access, is available at https://ashmibanerjee.github.io/trace-chatbot.

This tutorial covers topics on multi-agentic recommender systems — recommender systems augmented with Large Language Models (LLMs) and multi-agent orchestration to enable multi-step reasoning, tool use, and interactive decision-making. The tutorial emphasizes foundational concepts, reusable design patterns, and practical lessons learned from large-scale e-commerce deployments. Specifically, we first cover background and recent trends in generative recommender systems and their connection to agentic approaches. We then survey major deployment areas in industry and review the agent orchestration frameworks developed to support them. Finally, we present a project walkthrough that traces the full lifecycle of an agentic recommender system, from scoping and data definition through modeling, deployment, and monitoring, to provide actionable deployment insights. The tutorial bridges perspectives from information retrieval (IR), recommender systems (RecSys), and large-scale industrial practice. The accompanying material can be found at agenticrecsys.github.io.

This article explores the biases inherent in ChatGPT-based recommender systems, focusing on provider fairness (item-side fairness). Through extensive experiments and over a thousand API calls, we investigate the impact of prompt design strategies—including structure, system role, and intent—on evaluation metrics such as provider fairness, catalog coverage, temporal stability, and recency. The first experiment examines these strategies in classical top-K recommendations, while the second evaluates sequential in-context learning (ICL ). In the first experiment, we assess seven distinct prompt scenarios on top-K recommendation accuracy and fairness. Accuracy-oriented prompts, like Simple and Chain-of-Thought (COT), outperform diversification prompts, which, despite enhancing temporal freshness, reduce accuracy by up to 50%. Embedding fairness into system roles, such as “act as a fair recommender,” proved more effective than fairness directives within prompts. We also found that diversification prompts led to recommending newer movies, offering broader genre distribution compared to traditional collaborative filtering (CF) models. The system showed high consistency across multiple runs. The second experiment explores sequential ICL, comparing zero-shot and few-shot learning scenarios. Results indicate that including user demographic information in prompts affects model biases and stereotypes. However, ICL did not consistently improve item fairness and catalog coverage over zero-shot learning. Zero-shot learning achieved higher NDCG and coverage, while ICL-2 showed slight improvements in hit rate (HR) when age-group context was included. Overall, our study provides insights into biases of RecLLMs, particularly in provider fairness and catalog coverage. By examining prompt design, learning strategies, and system roles, we highlight the potential and challenges of integrating large language models into recommendation systems, paving the way for future research. Further details can be found at https://github.com/yasdel/Benchmark_RecLLM_Fairness.

The explosion of data and the widespread adoption of AI techniques, especially the success of foundation models and generative AI, have transformed knowledge discovery and data mining (KDD), making them integral to real-world decision-making. For both traditional AI methods and generative AI, issues such as data noise, algorithmic bias, lack of interpretability, and privacy concerns can significantly impact the quality and reliability of extracted knowledge, thereby affecting downstream decision-making. This workshop aims to bring together researchers and practitioners from information and knowledge management, data mining, and intelligent systems to explore trustworthy KDD across diverse settings in the generative AI era. We welcome contributions on robust data preprocessing, explainable learning algorithms, bias detection and mitigation, secure and privacy-preserving mining, trustworthy knowledge graph construction, resource-efficient deployment, alignment of foundation models, and applications for social good. Special emphasis is placed on emerging challenges posed by large-scale, pre-trained models in dynamic, multi-source, and user-centric environments. By fostering dialogue between traditional KDD approaches and innovations in the foundation model era, TrustKDD seeks to advance trustworthy methodologies that align with CIKM's mission of developing reliable, scalable, and intelligent information and knowledge systems.

Tourism Recommender Systems (TRS) are crucial in personalizing travel experiences by tailoring recommendations to users' preferences, constraints, and contextual factors. However, publicly available travel datasets often lack sufficient breadth and depth, limiting their ability to support advanced personalization strategies - particularly for sustainable travel and off-peak tourism. In this work, we explore using Large Language Models (LLMs) to generate synthetic travel queries that emulate diverse user personas and incorporate structured filters such as budget constraints and sustainability preferences. This paper introduces a novel SynthTRIPs framework for generating synthetic travel queries using LLMs grounded in a curated knowledge base (KB). Our approach combines persona-based preferences (e.g., budget, travel style) with explicit sustainability filters (e.g., walkability, air quality) to produce realistic and diverse queries. We mitigate hallucination and ensure factual correctness by grounding the LLM responses in the KB. We formalize the query generation process and introduce evaluation metrics for assessing realism and alignment. Both human expert evaluations and automatic LLM-based assessments demonstrate the effectiveness of our synthetic dataset in capturing complex personalization aspects underrepresented in existing datasets. While our framework was developed and tested for personalized city trip recommendations, the methodology applies to other recommender system domains. Code and dataset are made public at https://bit.ly/synthTRIPs

Recommender systems powered by generative models (Gen-RecSys) extend beyond classical item-ranking by producing open-ended content, which simultaneously unlocks richer user experiences and introduces new risks. On one hand, these systems can enhance personalization and appeal through dynamic explanations and multi-turn dialogues. On the other hand, they might venture into unknown territory-hallucinating nonexistent items, amplifying bias, or leaking private information. Traditional accuracy metrics cannot fully capture these challenges, as they fail to measure factual correctness, content safety, or alignment with user intent.

We present GENNEXT, a workshop dedicated to exploring the integration of language agents, generative models, and conversational AI within information retrieval (IR) and recommender systems (RS). Building on the success of our recent RecSys'24 workshop, GENNEXT aims to advance discussions on the applications of language agents powered by Large Language Models (LLMs). The workshop will focus on enhancing interactivity between users and systems through multi-turn dialogues, improving creative content generation, advancing personalization, and enabling multifaceted, context-aware decision-making. For example, a language agent could respond to a query like ''Suggest an eco-friendly food tour for a weekend in my city'' by using a recommendation API to identify eateries specializing in sustainable or organic cuisine and a pollution API to ensure the selected routes have low air pollution levels.

This intermediate-level tutorial, titled "Gen-RecSys", merges both industrial and academic perspectives on recent advances in Generative AI for recommender systems (beyond LLMs). It aims to highlight the transformative role of generative models in modern recommender systems, which have significantly impacted the AI field-particularly with the rise of large language models (LLMs) like ChatGPT-and have contributed to a rapid convergence of the fields of search, data mining, and recommendation. By providing attendees with a modern perspective on GenAI applications in recommendation, the tutorial will emphasize how generative models can drive recommendation by unlocking and interacting with rich data representations, including behavioral, textual, and multi-modal data-knowledge highly transferable across many applications of interest to the WSDM community. Participants will learn about the categorization of generative models in recommender systems based on underlying data modalities: (i) ID-based collaborative models, (ii) text-driven models such as LLMs, and (iii) multi-modal models. Within each category, various deep generative model paradigms (e.g., AR, GAN, diffusion models) will be introduced, along with insights into their application areas. The tutorial will also cover evaluation aspects, including benchmarks, metrics, and assessments of social and ethical impacts and harms. This tutorial presents a condensed version of the industrial and academic work featured in the forthcoming book at FntIR 2024-25, titled "Recommendation with Generative Models [7]," and a shorter version prepared, and presented by the team, see GenRecSys-Survey [6].

This work takes a critical stance on previous studies concerning fairness evaluation in Large-Language Model (LLM)-based recommender systems, which have primarily assessed consumer fairness by comparing recommendation lists generated with and without sensitive user attributes. Such approaches implicitly treat discrepancies in recommended items as biases, overlooking whether these changes might stem from genuine personalization aligned with true preferences of users. Moreover, these earlier studies typically address single sensitive attributes in isolation, neglecting the complex interplay of intersectional identities. In response to these shortcomings, we introduce CFaiRLLM , an enhanced evaluation framework that not only incorporates true preference alignment but also rigorously examines intersectional fairness by considering overlapping sensitive attributes. Additionally, CFaiRLLM introduces diverse user profile sampling strategies— random , top-rated , and recency-focused —to better understand the impact of profile generation fed to LLMs in light of inherent token limitations in these systems. Given that fairness depends on accurately understanding users’ tastes and preferences, these strategies provide a more realistic assessment of fairness within RecLLMs. To validate the efficacy of CFaiRLLM, we conducted extensive experiments using MovieLens and LastFM datasets, applying various sampling strategies and sensitive attribute configurations. The evaluation metrics include both item similarity measures and true preference alignment considering both hit and ranking (Jaccard Similarity and PRAG), thereby conducting a multi-faceted analysis of recommendation fairness. The results demonstrated that true preference alignment offers a more personalized and fair assessment compared to similarity-based measures, revealing significant disparities when sensitive and intersectional attributes are incorporated. Notably, our study finds that intersectional attributes amplify fairness gaps more prominently, especially in less structured domains such as music recommendations in LastFM. These findings suggest that future fairness evaluations in RecLLMs should incorporate true preference alignment to ensure equitable and genuinely personalized recommendations.

This editorial introduces the Special Issue on Trustworthy Recommender Systems , hosted by the ACM Transactions on Recommender Systems in 2024. We provide an overview on the multifaceted aspects of trustworthiness and point to recent regulations that underline the importance of the topic, also beyond technical perspectives. Subsequently, we present the nine articles constituting the special issue: one survey that reviews over 400 papers, categorizing them according to five trustworthiness dimensions, and eight research articles . We categorize and introduce the latter according to the major trustworthiness dimensions they address, specifically into privacy/security , transparency/explainability , and bias/fairness . We provide a summary of their main contributions and end with a brief personal statement about envisioned challenges ahead.

Traditional recommender systems typically use user-item rating histories as their main data source. However, deep generative models now have the capability to model and sample from complex data distributions, including user-item interactions, text, images, and videos, enabling novel recommendation tasks. This comprehensive, multidisciplinary survey connects key advancements in RS using Generative Models (Gen-RecSys), covering: interaction-driven generative models; the use of large language models (LLM) and textual data for natural language recommendation; and the integration of multimodal models for generating and processing images/videos in RS. Our work highlights necessary paradigms for evaluating the impact and harm of Gen-RecSys and identifies open challenges. This survey accompanies a "tutorial" presented at ACM KDD'24, with supporting materials provided at: https://encr.pw/vDhLq.

We present an overview of a workshop focused on the exploration of generative models within recommender systems (RS). It highlights the dual nature of these technologies: on the one hand, they offer groundbreaking opportunities for enhancing RS through improved personalization, innovative content creation, and interactive user experiences; on the other hand, they introduce a range of challenges, including bias, misinformation, privacy concerns, and environmental impact.

In recent years, there has been an increasing recognition that when machine learning (ML) algorithms are used to automate decisions, they may mistreat individuals or groups, with legal, ethical, or economic implications. Recommender systems are prominent examples of these ML systems that aid users in making decisions. The majority of past literature research on recommender systems fairness treats user and item fairness concerns independently, ignoring the fact that recommender systems function in a two-sided marketplace. In this article, we propose CP-FairRank , an optimization-based re-ranking algorithm that seamlessly integrates fairness constraints from both the consumer and producer side in a joint objective framework. The framework is generalizable and may take into account varied fairness settings based on group segmentation, recommendation model selection, and domain, which is one of its key characteristics. For instance, we demonstrate that the system may jointly increase consumer and producer fairness when (un)protected consumer groups are defined on the basis of their activity level and main-streamness , while producer groups are defined according to their popularity level. For empirical validation, through large-scale on eight datasets and four mainstream collaborative filtering recommendation models, we demonstrate that our proposed strategy is able to improve both consumer and producer fairness without compromising or very little overall recommendation quality, demonstrating the role algorithms may play in avoiding data biases. Our results on different group segmentation also indicate that the amount of improvement can vary and is dependent on group segmentation, indicating that the amount of bias produced and how much the algorithm can improve it depend on the protected group definition, a factor that, to our knowledge, has not been examined in great depth in previous studies but rather is highlighted by the results discovered in this study.

Popularity bias in recommendation lists refers to over-representation of popular content and is a challenge for many recommendation algorithms. Previous research has suggested several offline metrics to quantify popularity bias, which commonly relate the popularity of items in users' recommendation lists to the popularity of items in their interaction history. Discrepancies between these two factors are referred to as popularity miscalibration. While popularity metrics provide a straightforward and well-defined means to measure popularity bias, it is unknown whether they actually reflect users' perception of popularity bias.

Fairness is fundamental to all information access systems, including recommender systems. However, the landscape of fairness definition and measurement is quite scattered with many competing definitions that are partial and often incompatible. There is much work focusing on specific – and different – notions of fairness and there exist dozens of metrics of fairness in the literature, many of them redundant and most of them incompatible. In contrast, to our knowledge, there is no formal framework that covers all possible variants of fairness and allows developers to choose the most appropriate variant depending on the particular scenario. In this paper, we aim to define a general, flexible, and parameterizable framework that covers a whole range of fairness evaluation possibilities. Instead of modeling the metrics based on an abstract definition of fairness, the distinctive feature of this study compared to the current state of the art is that we start from the metrics applied in the literature to obtain a unified model by generalization. The framework is grounded on a general work hypothesis: interpreting the space of users and items as a probabilistic sample space, two fundamental measures in information theory (Kullback–Leibler Divergence and Mutual Information) can capture the majority of possible scenarios for measuring fairness on recommender system outputs. In addition, earlier research on fairness in recommender systems could be viewed as single-sided, trying to optimize some form of equity across either user groups or provider/procurer groups, without considering the user/item space in conjunction, thereby overlooking/disregarding the interplay between user and item groups. Instead, our framework includes the notion of statistical independence between user and item groups. We finally validate our approach experimentally on both synthetic and real data according to a wide range of state-of-the-art recommendation algorithms and real-world data sets, showing that with our framework we can measure fairness in a general, uniform, and meaningful way.

Due to their economic and significant importance, fault detection tasks in intelligent electrical grids are vital. Although numerous smart grid (SG) applications, such as fault detection and load forecasting, have adopted data-driven approaches, the robustness and security of these data-driven algorithms have not been widely examined. One of the greatest obstacles in the research of the security of smart grids is the lack of publicly accessible datasets that permit testing the system's resilience against various types of assault. In this paper, we present IEEE13-AdvAttack, a large-scaled simulated dataset based on the IEEE-13 test node feeder suitable for supervised tasks under SG. The dataset includes both conventional and renewable energy resources. We examine the robustness of fault type classification and fault zone classification systems to adversarial attacks. Through the release of datasets, benchmarking, and assessment of smart grid failure prediction systems against adversarial assaults, we seek to encourage the implementation of machine-learned security models in the context of smart grids. The benchmarking data and code for fault prediction are made publicly available on https://bit.ly/3NT5jxG.

When we appreciate a piece of music, it is most naturally because of its content, including rhythmic, tonal, and timbral elements as well as its lyrics and semantics. This suggests that the human affinity for music is inherently content-driven. This kind of information is, however, still frequently neglected by mainstream recommendation models based on collaborative filtering that rely solely on user-item interactions to recommend items to users. A major reason for this neglect is the lack of standardized datasets that provide both collaborative and content information. The work at hand addresses this shortcoming by introducing Music4All-Onion, a large-scale, multi-modal music dataset. The dataset expands the Music4All dataset by including 26 additional audio, video, and metadata characteristics for 109,269 music pieces. In addition, it provides a set of 252,984,396 listening records of 119,140 users, extracted from the online music platform Last.fm, which allows leveraging user-item interactions as well. We organize distinct item content features in an onion model according to their semantics, and perform a comprehensive examination of the impact of different layers of this model (e.g., audio features, user-generated content, and derivative content) on content-driven music recommendation, demonstrating how various content features influence accuracy, novelty, and fairness of music recommendation systems. In summary, with Music4All-Onion, we seek to bridge the gap between collaborative filtering music recommender systems and content-centric music recommendation requirements.

Recommending appropriate travel destinations to consumers based on contextual information such as their check-in time and location is a primary objective of Point-of-Interest (POI) recommender systems. However, the issue of contextual bias (i.e., how much consumers prefer one situation over another) has received little attention from the research community. This paper examines the effect of temporal bias, defined as the difference between users’ check-in hours, leisure vs. work hours, on the consumer-side fairness of context-aware recommendation algorithms. We believe that eliminating this type of temporal (and geographical) bias might contribute to a drop in traffic-related air pollution, noting that rush-hour traffic may be more congested. To surface effective POI recommendation, we evaluated the sensitivity of state-of-the-art context-aware models to the temporal bias contained in users’ check-in activities on two POI datasets, namely Gowalla and Yelp. The findings show that the examined context-aware recommendation models prefer one group of users over another based on the time of check-in and that this preference persists even when users have the same amount of interactions.

Recently, there has been a rising awareness that when machine learning (ML) algorithms are used to automate choices, they may treat/affect individuals unfairly, with legal, ethical, or economic consequences. Recommender systems are prominent examples of such ML systems that assist users in making high-stakes judgments.

Recommender systems (RSs) employ user-item feedback, e.g., ratings, to match customers to personalized lists of products. Approaches to top-k recommendation mainly rely on Learning-To-Rank algorithms and, among them, the most widely adopted is Bayesian Personalized Ranking (BPR), which bases on a pair-wise optimization approach. Recently, BPR has been found vulnerable against adversarial perturbations of its model parameters. Adversarial Personalized Ranking (APR) mitigates this issue by robustifying BPR via an adversarial training procedure. The empirical improvements of APR's accuracy performance on BPR have led to its wide use in several recommender models. However, a key overlooked aspect has been the beyond-accuracy performance of APR, i.e., novelty, coverage, and amplification of popularity bias, considering that recent results suggest that BPR, the building block of APR, is sensitive to the intensification of biases and reduction of recommendation novelty. In this work, we model the learning characteristics of the BPR and APR optimization frameworks to give mathematical evidence that, when the feedback data have a tailed distribution, APR amplifies the popularity bias more than BPR due to an unbalanced number of received positive updates from short-head items. Using matrix factorization (MF), we empirically validate the theoretical results by performing preliminary experiments on two public datasets to compare BPR-MF and APR-MF performance on accuracy and beyond-accuracy metrics. The experimental results consistently show the degradation of novelty and coverage measures and a worrying amplification of bias.

Recommender systems (RSs) have widely grown thanks to the outstanding capability of providing users with accurate and tailored recommendations. Recently, public awareness and new regulations forced RS researchers and practitioners to study solutions to user privacy endangerment. This tutorial will guide the attendees through the possible threats and the solutions towards private RSs.

Visual-based recommender systems (VRSs) enhance recommendation performance by integrating users' feedback with the visual features of items' images. Recently, human-imperceptible image perturbations, defined adversarial samples, have been shown capable of altering the VRSs performance, for example, by pushing (promoting) or nuking (demoting) specific categories of products. One of the most effective adversarial defense methods is adversarial training (AT), which enhances the robustness of the model by incorporating adversarial samples into the training process and minimizing an adversarial risk. The AT effectiveness has been verified on defending DNNs in supervised learning tasks such as image classification. However, the extent to which AT can protect deep VRSs, against adversarial perturbation of images remains mostly under-investigated. This work focuses on the defensive side of VRSs and provides general insights that could be further exploited to broaden the frontier in the field. First, we introduce a suite of adversarial attacks against DNNs on top of VRSs, and defense strategies to counteract them. Next, we present an evaluation framework, named Visual Adversarial Recommender (VAR), to empirically investigate the performance of defended or undefended DNNs in various visually-aware item recommendation tasks. The results of large-scale experiments indicate alarming risks in protecting a VRS through the DNN robustification. Source code and data are available at https://github.com/sisinflab/Visual-Adversarial-Recommendation.

Recent research on conversational information seeking (CIS) mostly focuses on uni-modal interactions and information items. This per- spective paper highlights the importance of moving towards de- veloping and evaluating multi-modal conversational information seeking (MMCIS) systems as they enable us to leverage richer context, overcome errors, and increase accessibility. We bridge the gap between the multi-modal and CIS research and provide a formal definition for MMCIS. We discuss potential opportunities and research challenges in designing, implementing, and evaluating MMCIS systems. Based on this research, we propose and implement a practical open-source framework for facilitating MMCIS research.

The impact of data characteristics on the performance of classical recommender systems has been recently investigated and produced fruitful results about the relationship they have with recommendation accuracy. This work provides a systematic study on the impact of broadly chosen data characteristics (DCs) of recommender systems. This is applied to the accuracy and fairness of several variations of CF recommendation models. We focus on a suite of DCs that capture properties about the structure of the user–item interaction matrix, the rating frequency, item properties, or the distribution of rating values. Experimental validation of the proposed system involved large-scale experiments by performing 23,400 recommendation simulations on three real-world datasets in the movie (ML-100K and ML-1M) and book domains (BookCrossing). The validation results show that the investigated DCs in some cases can have up to 90% of explanatory power – on several variations of classical CF algorithms –, while they can explain – in the best case – about 40% of fairness results (measured according to user gender and age sensitive attributes). Therefore, this work evidences that it is more difficult to explain variations in performance when dealing with fairness dimension than accuracy.

In 2019, the Recommender Systems Challenge [17] dealt for the first time with a real-world task from the area of e-tourism, namely the recommendation of hotels in booking sessions. In this context, we present the release of a new dataset that we believe is vitally important for recommendation systems research in the area of hotel search, from both academic and industry perspectives. In this article, we describe the qualitative characteristics of the dataset and present the comparison of several baseline algorithms trained on the data.

Adversarial Machine Learning (AML) has initially emerged as the field of study that investigates security issues of conventional and modern machine learning (ML) models. The objective of this tutorial is to present a comprehensive overview on the application of AML techniques for recommendation in a two-fold categorization: (i) AML for the attack/defense purposes, and (ii) AML to build GAN-based recommender models. A theoretical presentation on the topics is paired with two corresponding hands-on sessions to show the efficacy of AML application and push up novel ideas and advances in recommendation tasks. The tutorial is divided into four parts. We start by introducing a summary on state-of-the-art recommender models, including deep learning ones, and we define the fundamentals of AML. Then, we present the Adversarial Recommendation Framework, to represent attack/defense strategies on RSs, and the GAN-based Recommendation Framework, which is at the basis of novel adversarial-based generative recommenders. The presentation of each framework is followed by a practical session. Finally, we conclude with open challenges and possible future works for both applications.

Shilling attacks against collaborative filtering (CF) models are characterized by several fake user profiles mounted on the system by an adversarial party to harvest recommendation outcomes toward a malicious desire. The vulnerability of CF models is directly tied with their reliance on the underlying interaction data ---like user-item rating matrix (URM) --- to train their models and their inherent inability to distinguish genuine profiles from non-genuine ones. The majority of works conducted so far for analyzing shilling attacks mainly focused on properties such as confronted recommendation models, recommendation outputs, and even users under attack. The under-researched element has been the impact of data characteristics on the effectiveness of shilling attacks on CF models.

Recommender systems (RS) are an integral part of many online services aiming to provide an enhanced user-oriented experience. Machine learning (ML) models are nowadays broadly adopted in modern state-of-the-art approaches to recommendation, which are typically trained to maximize a user-centred utility (e.g., user satisfaction) or a business-oriented one (e.g., profitability or sales increase). They work under the main assumption that users' historical feedback can serve as proper ground-truth for model training and evaluation. However, driven by the success in the ML community, recent advances show that state-of-the-art recommendation approaches such as matrix factorization (MF) models or the ones based on deep neural networks can be vulnerable to adversarial perturbations applied on the input data. These adversarial samples can impede the ability for training high-quality MF models and can put the driven success of these approaches at high risk.

The workshop features presentations of accepted contributions to the RecSys Challenge 2019 organized by trivago, TU Wien, Politecnico di Bari, and Karlsruhe Institute of Technology. In the challenge, which originates from the domain of online travel recommender systems, participants had to build a click-prediction model based on user session interactions. Predictions were submitted in the form of a list of suggested accommodations and evaluated on an offline data set that contained the information what accommodation was clicked in the later part of a session. The data set contains anonymized information about almost 16 million session interactions of over 700.000 users visiting the trivago website.

One-dimensional intervals incremental inverted index (Di4) is a multi-resolution, single-dimension indexing framework for efficient, scalable, and extensible computation of genomic interval expressions. The framework has a tri-layer architecture: the semantic layer provides orthogonal and generic means (including the support of user-defined function) of sense-making and higher-lever reasoning from region-based datasets; the logical layer provides building blocks for region calculus and topological relations between intervals; the physical layer abstracts from persistence technology and makes the model adaptable to variety of persistence technologies, spanning from small-scale (e.g., B+tree) to large-scale (e.g., LevelDB). The extensibility of Di4 to application scenarios is shown with an example of comparative evaluation of ChIP-seq and DNase-Seq replicates. Performance of Di4 is benchmarked for small and large scale scenarios under common bioinformatics application scenarios. Di4 is freely available from https://genometric.github.io/Di4.

We propose a multi-modal content-based movie recommender system that replaces human-generated metadata with content descriptions automatically extracted from the visual and audio channels of a video. Content descriptors improve over traditional metadata in terms of both richness (it is possible to extract hundreds of meaningful features covering various modalities) and quality (content features are consistent across different systems and immune to human errors). Our recommender system integrates state-of-the-art aesthetic and deep visual features as well as block-level and i-vector audio features. For fusing the different modalities, we propose a rank aggregation strategy extending the Borda count approach.

This tutorial introduces multimedia recommender systems (MMRS), in particular, recommender systems that leverage multimedia content to recommend different media types. In contrast to the still most frequently adopted collaborative filtering approaches, we focus on content-based MMRS and on hybrids of collaborative filtering and content-based filtering. The target recommendation domains of the tutorial are movies, music and images. We present state-of-the-art approaches for multimedia feature extraction (text, audio, visual), including deep learning methods, and recommendation approaches tailored to the multimedia domain. Furthermore, by introducing common evaluation techniques, pointing to publicly available datasets specific to the multimedia domain, and discussing the grand challenges in MMRS research, this tutorial provides the audience with a profound introduction to MMRS and an inspiration to conduct further research.

The ACM Recommender Systems Challenge 20171 focused on the problem of job recommendations: given a new job advertisement, the goal was to identify those users who are both (a) interested in getting notified about the job advertisement, and (b) appropriate candidates for the given job. Participating teams had to balance between user interests and requirements for the given job as well as dealing with the cold-start situation. For the first time in the history of the conference, the RecSys challenge offered an online evaluation: teams first had to compete as part of a traditional offline evaluation and the top 25 teams were then invited to evaluate their algorithms in an online setting, where they could submit recommendations to real users. Overall, 262 teams registered for the challenge, 103 teams actively participated and submitted together more than 6100 solutions as part of the offline evaluation. Finally, 18 teams participated and rolled out recommendations to more than 900,000 users on XING2.

In the last years, there has been much attention given to the semantic gap problem in multimedia retrieval systems. Much effort has been devoted to bridge this gap by building tools for the extraction of high-level, semantics-based features from multimedia content, as low-level features are not considered useful because they deal primarily with representing the perceived content rather than the semantics of it.