In probabilistic topic models, a topic is characterised by a set of words, with a probability associated to each of them. Even though it is not necessary to understand the meaning of topics to perform common downstream tasks where topic models are used, such as topic inference or document similarity, there have been attempts to uncover the semantics of topics by providing labels to them, consisting in a couple of concepts. In this paper we propose a methodology, Conversational Probabilistic Topic Labelling (CPTL), to study whether conversational models can be used to generate labels that describe probabilistic topics given their most representative keywords. We evaluate and compare the performance of a selection of conversational models for the topic label generation task with the performance of a task-specific language model trained to generate topic labels.

With the ongoing growth in number of digital articles in a wider set of languages and the expanding use of different languages, we need annotation methods that enable browsing multi-lingual corpora. Multilingual probabilistic topic models have recently emerged as a group of semi-supervised machine learning models that can be used to perform thematic explorations on collections of texts in multiple languages. However, these approaches require theme-aligned training data to create a language-independent space. This constraint limits the amount of scenarios that this technique can offer solutions to train and makes it difficult to scale up to situations where a huge collection of multi-lingual documents are required during the training phase. This paper presents an unsupervised document similarity algorithm that does not require parallel or comparable corpora, or any other type of translation resource. The algorithm annotates topics automatically created from documents in a single language with cross-lingual labels and describes documents by hierarchies of multi-lingual concepts from independently-trained models. Experiments performed on the English, Spanish and French editions of JCR-Acquis corpora reveal promising results on classifying and sorting documents by similar content.

We present librAIry, a novel architecture to store, process and analyze large collections of textual resources, integrating existing algorithms and tools into a common, distributed, high-performance workflow. Available text mining techniques can be incorporated as independent plug&play modules working in a collaborative manner into the framework. In the absence of a pre-defined flow, librAIry leverages on the aggregation of operations executed by different components in response to an emergent chain of events. Extensive use of Linked Data (LD) and Representational State Transfer (REST) principles are made to provide individually addressable resources from textual documents. We have described the architecture design and its implementation and tested its effectiveness in real-world scenarios such as collections of research papers, patents or ICT aids, with the objective of providing solutions for decision makers and experts in those domains. Major advantages of the framework and lessons-learned from these experiments are reported.

There are many scenarios where we may want to find pairs of textually similar documents in a large corpus (e.g. a researcher doing literature review, or an R&D project manager analyzing project proposals). To programmatically discover those connections can help experts to achieve those goals, but brute-force pairwise comparisons are not computationally adequate when the size of the document corpus is too large. Some algorithms in the literature divide the search space into regions containing potentially similar documents, which are later processed separately from the rest in order to reduce the number of pairs compared. However, this kind of unsupervised methods still incur in high temporal costs. In this paper, we present an approach that relies on the results of a topic modeling algorithm over the documents in a collection, as a means to identify smaller subsets of documents where the similarity function can then be computed. This approach has proved to obtain promising results when identifying similar documents in the domain of scientific publications. We have compared our approach against state of the art clustering techniques and with different configurations for the topic modeling algorithm. Results suggest that our approach outperforms (> 0.5) the other analyzed techniques in terms of efficiency.