Event reasoning is to reason with events and certain inter-event relations. These cutting-edge techniques possess crucial and fundamental capabilities that underlie various applications. Large language models (LLMs) have made advances in event reasoning owing to their wealth of training. However, the LLMs commonly used today still do not consistently demonstrate proficiency in managing event reasoning as humans. This discrepancy arises from not explicitly modeling events and their relations and insufficient knowledge of event relations. In addition, the different reasoning paradigms of the LLMs are trained in an imbalanced way. In this paper, we propose WIZARDEVENT, to synthesize data from the unlabeled corpus with the proposed hybrid event-aware instruction tuning. Specifically, we first represent the events and their relation in a novel structure and then extract the knowledge from the raw text. Second, we introduce hybrid event reasoning paradigms with four reasoning formats. Lastly, we wrap our constructed WIZARDEVENT with the paradigms to create the instruction tuning dataset. We fine-tune the model with this enriched dataset, significantly improving the event reasoning. The performance of WIZARDEVENT is rigorously evaluated through extensive experiments. The results demonstrate that WIZARDEVENT substantially outperforms baselines, indicating the effectiveness of our approach.

Pre-trained language models have made significant advancements in text generation tasks. Nevertheless, evaluating the generated text with automatic metrics is still challenging. Compared with supervised metrics, unsupervised metrics which are known for generality and robustness, are frequently employed to assess the quality of generated text efficiently. The representative unsupervised metric BERTScore uses pretrained embedding to calculate the word-to-word similarity across all tokens as evaluation scores, which can introduce potential noise due to the inclusion of tokens that do not contribute significantly to the semantics of the text. Furthermore, its heavy reliance on dense embeddings may lead to lower accuracy when evaluating text outside the common contexts represented in the training data, making it less effective in handling uncommon linguistic patterns Additionally, BERTScore treats all tokens with equal importance and lacks the ability to perform meaningful contextual expansion, which can result in less accurate similarity measurements, particularly when dealing with paraphrased or semantically rich text. To address this problem, we propose an unsupervised automatic evaluation metric inspired by the concept of lexical match in information retrieval. Our method leverages contextualized lexical matching to measure exact matches between identical tokens and dynamically matches different tokens based on their contextualized representations. Experiments on SummEval and Topical-Chat demonstrate our proposed RetriEVAL can correlate better with human judgments than previous unsupervised metrics.

Semi-supervised anomaly detection (AD) has garnered growing attention due to its ability to effectively leverage limited labeled data to identify anomalies. However, current methods often impose artificial constraints on the proportion of unlabeled anomalies in the training set, thereby impeding the effective training of models for anomaly detection in real-world scenarios where several anomalies may be present in the unlabeled dataset. Additionally, existing methods often struggle to effectively exploit and model the complex relationships between data instances, which is critical for learning more discriminative features and accurate distance measures. Distance-based methods, in particular, typically rely on Euclidean distance metric, which lacks the flexibility to capture complex correlations across different data dimensions. To address the above challenges, we propose CAD, a denoising-aware Contrastive distance learning framework for semi-supervised AD. It introduces a contrastive training objective to facilitate the learning of distinctive representations by contrasting the average distance between anomalies and unlabeled samples. To fully exploit the information from the unlabeled data meanwhile mitigate the effects of noise, we incorporate a two-stage anomaly denoising and expansion strategy to refine the dataset by identifying high-confidence samples from the unlabeled set. Furthermore, we employ a parameterized bilinear tensor distance layer to learn a customized distance metric, enabling the model to capture intricate relationships among data points. Extensive experiments on 10 real-world datasets demonstrate that CAD significantly outperforms existing semi-supervised AD models. Code available at https://github.com/CADrepo/CAD.

Summarization quality evaluation is a non-trivial task in text summarization. Contemporary methods can be mainly categorized into two scenarios: (1)reference-based:evaluating with human-labeled reference summary; (2)reference-free:evaluating the summary consistency of the document. Recent studies mainly focus on one of these scenarios and explore training neural models to align with human criteria and finally give a numeric score. However, the models from different scenarios are optimized individually, which may result in sub-optimal performance since they neglect the shared knowledge across different scenarios. Besides, designing individual models for each scenario caused inconvenience to the user. Moreover, only providing the numeric quality evaluation score for users cannot help users to improve the summarization model, since they do not know why the score is low. Inspired by this, we proposeUnifiedMulti-scenarioSummarizationEvaluator (UMSE) andMulti-AgentSummarizationEvaluationExplainer (MASEE). More specifically, we propose a perturbed prefix tuning method to share cross-scenario knowledge between scenarios and use a self-supervised training paradigm to optimize the model without extra human labeling. Our UMSE is the first unified summarization evaluation framework engaged with the ability to be used in three evaluation scenarios. We propose a multi-agent summary evaluation explanation method MASEE, which employs several LLM-based agents to generate detailed natural language explanations in four different aspects. Experimental results across three typical scenarios on the benchmark dataset SummEval indicate that our UMSE can achieve comparable performance with several existing strong methods that are specifically designed for each scenario. And intensive quantitative and qualitative experiments also demonstrate the effectiveness of our proposed explanation method, which can generate consistent and accurate explanations.

Large-scale retrieval is to recall relevant documents from a huge collection given a query. It relies on representation learning to embed documents and queries into a common semantic encoding space. According to the encoding space, recent retrieval methods based on pre-trained language models (PLM) can be coarsely categorized into either dense-vector or lexicon-based paradigms. These two paradigms unveil the PLMs' representation capability in different granularities, i.e., global sequence-level compression and local word-level contexts, respectively. Inspired by their complementary global-local contextualization and distinct representing views, we propose a new learning framework, Unifier, which unifies dense-vector and lexicon-based retrieval in one model with a dual-representing capability. Experiments on passage retrieval benchmarks verify its effectiveness in both paradigms. A uni-retrieval scheme is further presented with even better retrieval quality. We lastly evaluate the model on BEIR benchmark to verify its transferability.

Neural knowledge models emerged and advanced common-sense-centric knowledge grounding. They parameterize a small seed curated commonsense knowledge graph (CS-KG) in a language model to generalize more. A current trend is to scale the seed up by directly mixing multiple sources of CS-KG (e.g., ATOMIC, ConceptNet) into one model. But, such brute-force mixing inevitably hinders effective knowledge consolidation due to i) ambiguous, polysemic, and/or inconsistent relations across sources and ii) knowledge learned in an entangled manner despite distinct types (e.g., causal, temporal). To mitigate this, we adopt a concept of commonsense knowledge dimension and propose a brand-new dimension-disentangled knowledge model (D2KM) learning paradigm with multiple sources. That is, a generative language model with dimension-specific soft prompts is trained to disentangle knowledge acquisitions along with different dimensions and facilitate potential intra-dimension consolidation across CS-KG sources. Experiments show our knowledge model outperforms its baselines in both standard and zero-shot scenarios.

Retrieval models based on dense representations in semantic space have become an indispensable branch for first-stage retrieval. These retrievers benefit from surging advances in representation learning towards compressive global sequence-level embeddings. However, they are prone to overlook local salient phrases and entity mentions in texts, which usually play pivot roles in first-stage retrieval. To mitigate this weakness, we propose to make a dense retriever align a well-performing lexicon-aware representation model. The alignment is achieved by weakened knowledge distillations to enlighten the retriever via two aspects – 1) a lexicon-augmented contrastive objective to challenge the dense encoder and 2) a pair-wise rank-consistent regularization to make the dense model’s behavior incline to the other. We evaluate our model on three public benchmarks, which shows that with a comparable lexicon-aware retriever as the teacher, our proposed dense one can bring consistent and significant improvements, and even outdo its teacher. In addition, we show our lexicon-aware distillation strategies are compatible with the standard ranker distillation, which can further lift state-of-the-art performance.1

Publishing the research works on academic publications is an important part of the scientific process. Since the development of computer science research is very fast, researchers tend to publish the research works in a fast way, such as conferences whose review processes are faster than the journals. In the past decades, one conference usually focuses on a specific research field and the topic or method overlap between conferences is low. We have noticed that, in recent years, some topics or methods which were once studied in a small number of specific research fields have become popular in many other fields. Naturally, we come up with two research questions: (1) Do the conferences indeed become similar? and (2) How do conferences become similar? In this paper, we first use a trans-temporal heterogeneous graph network to model academic conferences in recent 20 years. Due to the large number of conferences, we categorize these conferences into 6 research fields for brevity. Then, we first quantitatively and qualitatively assess “Do the research fields become similar?” and then focus on exploring “How do research fields become similar?”. From the result, we find the reason for the research fields in computer science become similar is that AI becomes pervasive and researchers tend to apply the machine learning methods to different application fields. Since the methods become universal between different research fields, researchers should pay more attention to advanced information in other fields to motivate more interdisciplinary works. To assist the researchers to explore related interdisciplinary advanced information, it is crucial to measure the cross-field impact of papers using the citation information and recommend the paper which has a high cross-field impact on the related researchers. As for the newly published papers which do not have any citations, we also propose a cross-field impact prediction model to recommend the cutting-edge research works to related researchers accurately. Experiments conducted on real-world datasets verify the effectiveness of the proposed method.

Recently, knowledge-grounded dialogue systems have gained increasing attention. Great efforts have been made to build response matching models where all dialogue content and knowledge sentences are leveraged. However, knowledge redundancy and distraction of irrelevant dialogue content often exist in knowledge-grounded conversations, which may affect the matching process and lead to inferior performance. In addition, irrelevant dialogue history and excessive knowledge also hinder the exploitation of popular pre-trained language models (PLMs) due to the limitation of input length. To address these challenges, we propose a new knowledge-grounded dialogue model based on PLMs, where a knowledge selector and a context selector are designed for filtering out irrelevant knowledge sentences and redundant dialogue history, respectively. Considering the lack of labeled data for the learning of two selectors, we pre-train them with weakly-supervised tasks and then jointly conduct the optimization of knowledge and context selection and fine-tuning of PLMs for response ranking with reinforcement learning (RL). By this means, the dialogue model can distill more accurate and concise knowledge and dialogue content for subsequent response ranking module, and the overall model can converge and perform better. We conduct experiments on two benchmarks and evaluation results indicate that our model can significantly outperform the state-of-the-art methods.

Aspect-based sentiment analysis (ABSA) plays an indispensable role in web mining and retrieval system as it involves a wide range of tasks, including aspect term extraction, opinion term extraction, aspect sentiment classification, etc. Early works are merely applicable to a part of these tasks, leading to computation-unfriendly models and a pipeline framework. Recently, a unified framework has been proposed to learn all these ABSA tasks in an end-to-end fashion. Despite its versatility, its performance is still sub-optimal since ABSA tasks depend heavily on both sentiment and syntax knowledge, but existing task-specific knowledge integration methods are hardly applicable to such a unified framework. Therefore, we propose a brand-new unified framework for ABSA in this work, which incorporates both implicit sentiment knowledge and explicit syntax knowledge to better complete all ABSA tasks. To effectively incorporate implicit sentiment knowledge, we first design a self-supervised pre-training procedure that is general enough to all ABSA tasks. It consists of conjunctive words prediction (CWP) task, sentiment-word polarity prediction (SPP) task, attribute nouns prediction (ANP) task, and sentiment-oriented masked language modeling (SMLM) task. Empowered by the pre-training procedure, our framework acquires strong abilities in sentiment representation and sentiment understanding. Meantime, considering a subtle syntax variation can significantly affect ABSA, we further explore a sparse relational graph attention network (SR-GAT) to introduce explicit aspect-oriented syntax knowledge. By combining both worlds of knowledge, our unified model can better represent and understand the input texts towards all ABSA tasks. Extensive experiments show that our proposed framework achieves consistent and significant improvements on all ABSA tasks.

Recently, many neural context-response matching models have been developed for retrieval-based dialogue systems. Although existing models achieve impressive performance through learning on a large amount of in-domain parallel dialogue data, they usually perform worse in another new domain. How to transfer a response retrieval model trained in high-resource domains to other low-resource domains is a crucial problem for scalable dialogue systems. To this end, we investigate the unsupervised cross-domain adaptation for response selection when the target domain has no parallel dialogue data. Specifically, we propose a two-stage method to adapt a response selection model to a new domain using self-supervised and adversarial training based on pre-trained language models (PLMs). To efficiently incorporate domain awareness and target-domain knowledge to PLMs, we first design a self-supervised post-training procedure, including domain discrimination (DD) task, target-domain masked language model (MLM) task and target-domain next sentence prediction (NSP) task. Based on this, we further conduct the adversarial fine-tuning to empower the model to match the proper response with extracted domain-shared features as much as possible. Experimental results show that our proposed method achieves consistent and significant improvements on several cross-domain response selection datasets.

Existing multi-turn context-response matching methods mainly concentrate on obtaining multi-level and multi-dimension representations and better interactions between context utterances and response. However, in real-place conversation scenarios, whether a response candidate is suitable not only counts on the given dialogue context but also other backgrounds, e.g., wording habits, user-specific dialogue history content. To fill the gap between these up-to-date methods and the real-world applications, we incorporate user-specific dialogue history into the response selection and propose a personalized hybrid matching network (PHMN). Our contributions are two-fold: (1) our model extracts personalized wording behaviors from user-specific dialogue history as extra matching information; (2) we perform hybrid representation learning on context-response utterances and explicitly incorporate a customized attention mechanism to extract vital information from context-response interactions so as to improve the accuracy of matching. We evaluate our model on two large datasets with user identification, i.e., personalized Ubuntu dialogue Corpus (P-Ubuntu) and personalized Weibo dataset (P-Weibo). Experimental results confirm that our method significantly outperforms several strong models by combining personalized attention, wording behaviors, and hybrid representation learning.

Building an intelligent dialogue system with the ability to select a proper response according to a multi-turn context is challenging in three aspects: (1) the meaning of a context–response pair is built upon language units from multiple granularities (e.g., words, phrases, and sub-sentences, etc.); (2) local (e.g., a small window around a word) and long-range (e.g., words across the context and the response) dependencies may exist in dialogue data; and (3) the relationship between the context and the response candidate lies in multiple relevant semantic clues or relatively implicit semantic clues in some real cases. However, existing approaches usually encode the dialogue with mono-type representation and the interaction processes between the context and the response candidate are executed in a rather shallow manner, which may lead to an inadequate understanding of dialogue content and hinder the recognition of the semantic relevance between the context and response. To tackle these challenges, we propose a representation [ K ] -interaction [ L ] -matching framework that explores multiple types of deep interactive representations to build context-response matching models for response selection. Particularly, we construct different types of representations for utterance–response pairs and deepen them via alternate encoding and interaction. By this means, the model can handle the relation of neighboring elements, phrasal pattern, and long-range dependencies during the representation and make a more accurate prediction through multiple layers of interactions between the context–response pair. Experiment results on three public benchmarks indicate that the proposed model significantly outperforms previous conventional context-response matching models and achieve slightly better results than the BERT model for multi-turn response selection in retrieval-based dialogue systems.

Recently, knowledge-grounded conversations in the open domain gain great attention from researchers. Existing works on retrieval-based dialogue systems have paid tremendous efforts to utilize neural networks to build a matching model, where all of the context and knowledge contents are used to match the response candidate with various representation methods.

In this paper, we study context-response matching with pre-trained contextualized representations for multi-turn response selection in retrieval-based chatbots. Existing models, such as Cove and ELMo, are trained with limited context (often a single sentence or paragraph), and may not work well on multi-turn conversations, due to the hierarchical nature, informal language, and domain-specific words. To address the challenges, we propose pre-training hierarchical contextualized representations, including contextual word-level and sentence-level representations, by learning a dialogue generation model from large-scale conversations with a hierarchical encoder-decoder architecture. Then the two levels of representations are blended into the input and output layer of a matching model respectively. Experimental results on two benchmark conversation datasets indicate that the proposed hierarchical contextualized representations can bring significantly and consistently improvement to existing matching models for response selection.

Generating qualitative responses has always been a challenge for human-computer dialogue systems. Existing dialogue systems generally derive from either retrieval-based or generative-based approaches, both of which have their own pros and cons. Despite the natural idea of an ensemble model of the two, existing ensemble methods only focused on leveraging one approach to enhance another, we argue however that they can be further mutually enhanced with a proper training strategy. In this paper, we propose ensembleGAN, an adversarial learning framework for enhancing a retrieval-generation ensemble model in open-domain conversation scenario. It consists of a language-model-like generator, a ranker generator, and one ranker discriminator. Aiming at generating responses that approximate the ground-truth and receive high ranking scores from the discriminator, the two generators learn to generate improved highly relevant responses and competitive unobserved candidates respectively, while the discriminative ranker is trained to identify true responses from adversarial ones, thus featuring the merits of both generator counterparts. The experimental results on a large short-text conversation data demonstrate the effectiveness of the ensembleGAN by the amelioration on both human and automatic evaluation metrics.

We consider context-response matching with multiple types of representations for multi-turn response selection in retrieval-based chatbots. The representations encode semantics of contexts and responses on words, n-grams, and sub-sequences of utterances, and capture both short-term and long-term dependencies among words. With such a number of representations in hand, we study how to fuse them in a deep neural architecture for matching and how each of them contributes to matching. To this end, we propose a multi-representation fusion network where the representations can be fused into matching at an early stage, at an intermediate stage, or at the last stage. We empirically compare different representations and fusing strategies on two benchmark data sets. Evaluation results indicate that late fusion is always better than early fusion, and by fusing the representations at the last stage, our model significantly outperforms the existing methods, and achieves new state-of-the-art performance on both data sets. Through a thorough ablation study, we demonstrate the effect of each representation to matching, which sheds light on how to select them in practical systems.