Multimodal embedding models, rooted in multimodal large language models (MLLMs), have yielded significant performance improvements across diverse tasks such as retrieval and classification. However, most existing approaches rely heavily on large-scale contrastive learning and offer limited exploration of how the architectural and training paradigms of MLLMs affect embedding quality. While effective for generation, the causal attention and next-token prediction paradigm of MLLMs does not explicitly encourage the formation of globally compact representations, limiting their effectiveness as multimodal embedding backbones. To address this, we propose CoCoA, a Content reconstruction pre-training paradigm based on Collaborative Attention for universal multimodal representation learning. Specifically, we restructure the attention flow and introduce an EOS-based reconstruction task, encouraging the model to reconstruct input from the corresponding (EOS) embeddings. This drives the multimodal model to compress the semantic information of the input into the (EOS) token, laying the foundations for subsequent contrastive learning. Extensive experiments on MMEB-V1 demonstrate that CoCoA built upon Qwen2-VL and Qwen2.5-VL significantly improves embedding quality. Results validate that content reconstruction serves as an effective strategy to maximize the value of existing data, enabling multimodal embedding models to generate compact and informative representations, raising their performance ceiling. Our project is available at https://github.com/Trustworthy-Information-Access/CoCoA.

As more content generated by large language models (LLMs) floods into the Internet, information retrieval (IR) systems now face the challenge of distinguishing and handling a blend of human-authored and machine-generated texts. Recent studies suggest that neural retrievers may exhibit a preferential inclination toward LLM-generated content, while classic term-based retrievers like BM25 tend to favor human-written documents. This paper investigates the influence of LLM-generated content on term-based retrieval models, which are valued for their efficiency and robust generalization across domains. Our linguistic analysis reveals that LLM-generated texts exhibit smoother high-frequency and steeper low-frequency Zipf slopes, higher term specificity, and greater document-level diversity. These traits are aligned with LLMs being trained to optimize reader experience through diverse and precise expressions. Our study further explores whether term-based retrieval models demonstrate source bias, concluding that these models prioritize documents whose term distributions closely correspond to those of the queries, rather than displaying an inherent source bias. This work provides a foundation for understanding and addressing potential biases in term-based IR systems managing mixed-source content. Code and supplementary material are available at https://github.com/Trustworthy-Information-Access/LLM-Impact-Term-Retrieval.

The first-stage retrieval aims to retrieve a subset of candidate documents from a huge collection both effectively and efficiently. Since various matching patterns can exist between queries and relevant documents, previous work tries to combine multiple retrieval models to find as many relevant results as possible. The constructed ensembles, whether learned independently or jointly, do not care which component model is more suitable to an instance during training. Thus, they cannot fully exploit the capabilities of different types of retrieval models in identifying diverse relevance patterns. Motivated by this observation, in this article, we propose a Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) model consisting of representative matching experts and a novel competitive learning mechanism to let the experts develop and enhance their expertise during training. Specifically, our MoE model shares the bottom layers to learn common semantic representations and uses differently structured upper layers to represent various types of retrieval experts. Our competitive learning mechanism has two stages: (1) a standardized learning stage to train the experts equally to develop their capabilities to conduct relevance matching; (2) a specialized learning stage where the experts compete with each other on every training instance and get rewards and updates according to their performance to enhance their expertise on certain types of samples. Experimental results on retrieval benchmark datasets show that our method significantly outperforms the state-of-the-art baselines in the in-domain and out-of-domain settings.

First-stage retrieval is a critical task that aims to retrieve relevant document candidates from a large-scale collection. While existing retrieval models have achieved impressive performance, they are mostly studied on static data sets, ignoring that in the real-world, the data on the Web is continuously growing with potential distribution drift. Consequently, retrievers trained on static old data may not suit new-coming data well and inevitably produce sub-optimal results. In this work, we study lifelong learning for first-stage retrieval, especially focusing on the setting where the emerging documents are unlabeled since relevance annotation is expensive and may not keep up with data emergence. Under this setting, we aim to develop model updating with two goals: (1) to effectively adapt to the evolving distribution with the unlabeled new-coming data, and (2) to avoid re-inferring all embeddings of old documents to efficiently update the index each time the model is updated.

Neural ranking models (NRMs) have become one of the most important techniques in information retrieval (IR). Due to the limitation of relevance labels, the training of NRMs heavily relies on negative sampling over unlabeled data. In general machine learning scenarios, it has shown that training with hard negatives (i.e., samples that are close to positives) could lead to better performance. Surprisingly, we find opposite results from our empirical studies in IR. When sampling top-ranked results (excluding the labeled positives) as negatives from a stronger retriever, the performance of the learned NRM becomes even worse. Based on our investigation, the superficial reason is that there are more false negatives (i.e., unlabeled positives) in the top-ranked results with a stronger retriever, which may hurt the training process; The root is the existence of pooling bias in the dataset constructing process, where annotators only judge and label very few samples selected by some basic retrievers. Therefore, in principle, we can formulate the false negative issue in training NRMs as learning from labeled datasets with pooling bias. To solve this problem, we propose a novel Coupled Estimation Technique (CET) that learns both a relevance model and a selection model simultaneously to correct the pooling bias for training NRMs. Empirical results on three retrieval benchmarks show that NRMs trained with our technique can achieve significant gains on ranking effectiveness against other baseline strategies.

Multi-stage ranking pipelines have been a practical solution in modern search systems, where the first-stage retrieval is to return a subset of candidate documents and latter stages attempt to re-rank those candidates. Unlike re-ranking stages going through quick technique shifts over the past decades, the first-stage retrieval has long been dominated by classical term-based models. Unfortunately, these models suffer from the vocabulary mismatch problem, which may block re-ranking stages from relevant documents at the very beginning. Therefore, it has been a long-term desire to build semantic models for the first-stage retrieval that can achieve high recall efficiently. Recently, we have witnessed an explosive growth of research interests on the first-stage semantic retrieval models. We believe it is the right time to survey current status, learn from existing methods, and gain some insights for future development. In this article, we describe the current landscape of the first-stage retrieval models under a unified framework to clarify the connection between classical term-based retrieval methods, early semantic retrieval methods, and neural semantic retrieval methods. Moreover, we identify some open challenges and envision some future directions, with the hope of inspiring more research on these important yet less investigated topics.