Automatic knowledge graph (KG) construction is widely used for e.g. data integration, question answering and semantic search. There are many approaches of automatic KG construction. Among which, an important approach is to map the raw data to a given domain KG schema, e.g., domain ontology or conceptual graph, and construct the entities and properties according to the domain KG schema. However, the existing approaches to construct KGs are not always efficient enough and the resulting KGs are not sufficiently application and user-friendly. The main challenge arises from the trade-off: the domain KG schema should be domain-generic and knowledge-oriented, to reflect the general domain knowledge rather than data particularities; while a KG schema should be data-oriented, to cover all data features. If the former is directly used for KG construction, this can cause issues like a high load of blank nodes, which are technical nodes in the KGs that represent unknown entities. To this end, we propose our ScheRe system in the demo, which relies on a schema reshaping algorithm and other two semantic modules for enhancing KG construction. The demo attendees will use ScheRe to reshape a domain KG schema to data specific KG schema, build KGs with industrial data, and experience more user-friendly querying.

Abstract Real-world knowledge graphs (KGs) are usually incomplete—that is, miss some facts representing valid information. So, when applied to such KGs, standard symbolic query engines fail to produce answers that are expected but not logically entailed by the KGs. To overcome this issue, state-of-the-art ML-based approaches first embed KGs and queries into a low-dimensional vector space, and then produce query answers based on the proximity of the candidate entity and the query embeddings in the embedding space. This allows embedding-based approaches to obtain expected answers that are not logically entailed. However, embedding-based approaches are not applicable in the inductive setting, where KG entities (i.e., constants) seen at runtime may differ from those seen during training. In this paper, we propose a novel neuro-symbolic approach to query answering over incomplete KGs applicable in the inductive setting. Our approach first symbolically augments the input KG with facts representing parts of the KG that match query fragments, and then applies a generalisation of the Relational Graph Convolutional Networks (RGCNs) to the augmented KG to produce the predicted query answers. We formally prove that, under reasonable assumptions, our approach can capture an approach based on vanilla RGCNs (and no KG augmentation) using a (often substantially) smaller number of layers. Finally, we empirically validate our theoretical findings by evaluating an implementation of our approach against the RGCN baseline on several dedicated benchmarks.

Estimating the cardinality (i.e., the number of answers) of conjunctive queries is particularly difficult in RDF systems: queries over RDF data are navigational and thus tend to involve many joins. We present a new, principled cardinality estimation technique based on graph summarisation. We interpret a summary of an RDF graph using a possible world semantics and formalise the estimation problem as computing the expected cardinality over all RDF graphs represented by the summary, and we present a closed-form formula for computing the expectation of arbitrary queries. We also discuss approaches to RDF graph summarisation. Finally, we show empirically that our cardinality technique is more accurate and more consistent, often by orders of magnitude, than the state of the art.

Faceted search is a prominent search paradigm that became the standard in many Web applications and has also been recently proposed as a suitable paradigm for exploring and querying RDF graphs. One of the main challenges that hampers usability of faceted search systems especially in the RDF context is information overload, that is, when the size of faceted interfaces becomes comparable to the size of the data over which the search is performed. In this demo we present (an extension of) our faceted search system SemFacet and focus on features that address the information overload: ranking, aggregation, and reachability. The demo attendees will be able to try our system on an RDF graph that models online shopping over a catalogs with up to millions of products.

Answering aggregate queries is a key requirement of emerging applications of Semantic Technologies, such as data warehousing, business intelligence, and sensor networks. To fulfil the requirements of such applications, the standardization of SPARQL 1.1 led to the introduction of a wide range of constructs that enable value computation, aggregation, and query nesting. In this article, we provide an in-depth formal analysis of the semantics and expressive power of these new constructs as defined in the SPARQL 1.1 specification, and hence lay the necessary foundations for the development of robust, scalable, and extensible query engines supporting complex numerical and analytics tasks.

SPARQL is the standard query language for RDF data. The distinctive feature of SPARQL is the OPTIONAL operator, which allows for partial answers when complete answers are not available due to lack of information. However, optional matching is computationally expensive - query answering is PSPACE-complete. The well-designed fragment of SPARQL achieves much better computational properties by restricting the use of optional matching - query answering becomes coNP-complete. However, well-designed SPARQL captures far from all real-life queries - in fact, only about half of the queries over DBpedia that use OPTIONAL are well-designed. In the present paper, we study queries outside of well-designed SPARQL. We introduce the class of weakly well-designed queries that subsumes well-designed queries and includes most common meaningful non-well-designed queries: our analysis shows that the new fragment captures about 99% of DBpedia queries with OPTIONAL. At the same time, query answering for weakly well-designed SPARQL remains coNP-complete, and our fragment is in a certain sense maximal for this complexity. We show that the fragment's expressive power is strictly in-between well-designed and full SPARQL. Finally, we provide an intuitive normal form for weakly well-designed queries and study the complexity of containment and equivalence.

Semantic Web systems provide open interfaces for end-users to access data via a powerful high-level query language, SPARQL. But users unfamiliar with either the details of SPARQL or properties of the target dataset may find it easier to query by example -- give examples of the information they want (or examples of both what they want and what they do not want) and let the system reverse engineer the desired query from the examples. This approach has been heavily used in the setting of relational databases. We provide here an investigation of the reverse engineering problem in the context of SPARQL. We first provide a theoretical study, formalising variants of the reverse engineering problem and giving tight bounds on its complexity. We next explain an implementation of a reverse engineering tool for positive examples. An experimental analysis of the tool shows that it scales well in the data size, number of examples, and in the size of the smallest query that fits the data. We also give evidence that reverse engineering tools can provide benefits on real-life datasets.

Answering aggregate queries is a key requirement of emerging applications of Semantic Technologies, such as data warehousing, business intelligence and sensor networks. In order to fulfill the requirements of such applications, the standardisation of SPARQL 1.1 led to the introduction of a wide range of constructs that enable value computation, aggregation, and query nesting. In this paper we provide an in-depth formal analysis of the semantics and expressive power of these new constructs as defined in the SPARQL 1.1 specification, and hence lay the necessary foundations for the development of robust, scalable and extensible query engines supporting complex numerical and analytics tasks.

SPARQL has become the most popular language for querying RDF datasets, the standard data model for representing information in the Web. This query language has received a good deal of attention in the last few years: two versions of W3C standards have been issued, several SPARQL query engines have been deployed, and important theoretical foundations have been laid. However, many fundamental aspects of SPARQL queries are not yet fully understood. To this end, it is crucial to understand the correspondence between SPARQL and well-developed frameworks like relational algebra or first order logic. But one of the main obstacles on the way to such understanding is the fact that the well-studied fragments of SPARQL do not produce RDF as output. In this paper we embark on the study of SPARQL CONSTRUCT queries, that is, queries which output RDF graphs. This class of queries takes rightful place in the standards and implementations, but contrary to SELECT queries, it has not yet attracted a worth-while theoretical research. Under this framework we are able to establish a strong connection between SPARQL and well-known logical and database formalisms. In particular, the fragment which does not allow for blank nodes in output templates corresponds to first order queries, its well-designed sub-fragment corresponds to positive first order queries, and the general language can be re-stated as a data exchange setting. These correspondences allow us to conclude that the general language is not composable, but the aforementioned blank-free fragments are. Finally, we enrich SPARQL with a recursion operator and establish fundamental properties of this extension.

The graph database model is currently one of the most pop-ular paradigms for storing data, used in applications such as social networks, biological databases and the Semantic Web. Despite the popularity of this model, the develop-ment of graph database management systems is still in its infancy, and there are several fundamental issues regarding graph databases that are not fully understood. Indeed, while graph query languages that concentrate on topological prop-erties are now well developed, not much is known about lan-guages that can query both the topology of graphs and their underlying data. Our goal is to conduct a detailed study of static analysis problems for such languages. In this paper we consider the containment problem for several recently proposed classes of queries that manipulate both topology and data: regu-lar queries with memory, regular queries with data tests, and graph XPath. Our results show that the problem is in general undecidable for all of these classes. However, we find natural fragments that enjoy much better static analy-sis properties: the containment problem is decidable, and its computational complexity ranges from PSPACE-complete to EXPSPACE-complete. We also propose several exten-sions of the classes and study containment for them. 1.

We study the problem of query containment of conjunctive queries over annotated databases. Annotations are typically attached to tuples and represent metadata, such as probability, multiplicity, comments, or provenance. It is usually assumed that annotations are drawn from a commutative semiring. Such databases pose new challenges in query optimization, since many related fundamental tasks, such as query containment, have to be reconsidered in the presence of propagation of annotations. We axiomatize several classes of semirings for each of which containment of conjunctive queries is equivalent to existence of a particular type of homomorphism. For each of these types, we also specify all semirings for which existence of a corresponding homomorphism is a sufficient (or necessary) condition for the containment. We develop new decision procedures for containment for some semirings which are not in any of these classes. This generalizes and systematizes previous approaches.

Most systems that have been developed for annotation of data assume a two-level structure in which annotation is superimposed on, and separate from, the data. However there are many cases in which an annotation may itself be annotated. For example threads in e-mail and newsgroups allow the imposition of one comment on another; belief annotations can be compounded; and valid time, regarded as an annotation can be freely mixed with belief annotations (at time t1, B1 believed that at time t2, B2 believed that...).

Annotation is some form of data that is added to an existing database. It could be additional data that for whatever reason cannot be stored in the original database, or it could be some form of metadata such as comments, probabilities, timestamps that are not normally regarded part of the basic database design. It has recently been observed that, in order to determine how annotations should be propagated through database queries, we need to have some structure on them. Although various forms of annotation have been considered in some detail, each form has been considered in isolation.

We study the problem of query containment of (unions of) conjunctive queries over annotated databases. Annotations are typically attached to tuples and represent metadata such as probability, multiplicity, comments, or provenance. It is usually assumed that annotations are drawn from a commutative semiring. Such databases pose new challenges in query optimization, since many related fundamental tasks, such as query containment, have to be reconsidered in the presence of propagation of annotations.