In this paper, we propose Graph Retention Networks (GRNs) as a unified architecture for deep learning on dynamic graphs. The GRN extends the concept of retention into dynamic graph data as graph retention, equipping the model with three key computational paradigms: parallelizable training, low-cost $\mathcal{O}(1)$ inference, and long-term chunkwise training. This architecture achieves an optimal balance between efficiency, effectiveness, and scalability. Extensive experiments on benchmark datasets demonstrate its strong performance in both edge-level prediction and node-level classification tasks with significantly reduced training latency, lower GPU memory overhead, and improved inference throughput by up to 86.7x compared to SOTA baselines. The proposed GRN architecture achieves competitive performance across diverse dynamic graph benchmarks, demonstrating its adaptability to a wide range of tasks.

Abstract In this article, we present a method to automatically build large labeled datasets for the author ambiguity problem in the academic world by leveraging the authoritative academic resources, ORCID and DOI. Using the method, we built LAGOS‐AND, two large, gold‐standard sub‐datasets for author name disambiguation (AND), of which LAGOS‐AND‐BLOCK is created for clustering‐based AND research and LAGOS‐AND‐PAIRWISE is created for classification‐based AND research. Our LAGOS‐AND datasets are substantially different from the existing ones. The initial versions of the datasets (v1.0, released in February 2021) include 7.5 M citations authored by 798 K unique authors (LAGOS‐AND‐BLOCK) and close to 1 M instances (LAGOS‐AND‐PAIRWISE). And both datasets show close similarities to the whole Microsoft Academic Graph (MAG) across validations of six facets. In building the datasets, we reveal the variation degrees of last names in three literature databases, PubMed, MAG, and Semantic Scholar, by comparing author names hosted to the authors' official last names shown on the ORCID pages. Furthermore, we evaluate several baseline disambiguation methods as well as the MAG's author IDs system on our datasets, and the evaluation helps identify several interesting findings. We hope the datasets and findings will bring new insights for future studies. The code and datasets are publicly available.

Abstract Each section header of an article has its distinct communicative function. Citations from distinct sections may be different regarding citing motivation. In this paper, we grouped section headers with similar functions as a structural function and defined the distribution of citations from structural functions for a paper as its citation structure. We aim to explore the relationship between citation structure and the future impact of a publication and disclose the relative importance among citations from different structural functions. Specifically, we proposed two citation counting methods and a citation life cycle identification method, by which the regression data were built. Subsequently, we employed a ridge regression model to predict the future impact of the paper and analyzed the relative weights of regressors. Based on documents collected from the Association for Computational Linguistics Anthology website, our empirical experiments disclosed that functional structure features improve the prediction accuracy of citation count prediction and that there exist differences among citations from different structural functions. Specifically, at the early stage of citation lifetime, citations from Introduction and Method are particularly important for perceiving future impact of papers, and citations from Result and Conclusion are also vital. However, early accumulation of citations from the Background seems less important.