Continual Learning (CL) primarily aims to retain knowledge to prevent catastrophic forgetting and transfer knowledge to facilitate learning new tasks. Unlike traditional methods, we propose a novel perspective: CL not only needs to prevent forgetting, but also requires intentional forgetting.This arises from existing CL methods ignoring biases in real-world data, leading the model to learn spurious correlations that transfer and amplify across tasks. From feature extraction and prediction results, we find that data biases simultaneously reduce CL's ability to retain and transfer knowledge. To address this, we propose ErrorEraser, a universal plugin that removes erroneous memories caused by biases in CL, enhancing performance in both new and old tasks. ErrorEraser consists of two modules: Error Identification and Error Erasure. The former learns the probability density distribution of task data in the feature space without prior knowledge, enabling accurate identification of potentially biased samples. The latter ensures only erroneous knowledge is erased by shifting the decision space of representative outlier samples. Additionally, an incremental feature distribution learning strategy is designed to reduce the resource overhead during error identification in downstream tasks. Extensive experimental results show that ErrorEraser significantly mitigates the negative impact of data biases, achieving higher accuracy and lower forgetting rates across three types of CL methods. The code is available at https://github.com/diadai/ErrorEraser.

We investigate the challenge of generating OverpassQL from natural language in the Text-to-OverpassQL task and explore the data in the existing OverpassNL dataset. To address the structural mismatch between natural language and OverpassQL, we propose a task decomposition-based multi-step prompting approach that generates auxiliary information to help align natural language with OverpassQL structures, thereby enhancing model performance. Furthermore, we introduce a Key-Value Correction Module specifically targeting key-value pair matching difficulties in Text-to-OverpassQL tasks, designed to rectify potential syntactic errors and key-value mismatches in generated queries. Our experiments on GPT-3.5 Turbo and GPT-4 demonstrate absolute performance gains of$\mathbf{1. 4 \%}$and 0.6 % respectively. Under retrieval-augmented setting ablation, we achieve a more significant 3.5 % improvement with GPT-3.5 Turbo. Experimental results confirm that our method consistently improves performance across various models and configurations, particularly showing enhanced effectiveness in medium and small-scale models.

Foundation Models (FMs) such as GPT-4 encoded with vast knowledge and powerful emergent abilities have achieved remarkable success in various natural language processing and computer vision tasks. Grounding FMs by adapting them to domain-specific tasks or augmenting them with domain-specific knowledge enables us to exploit the full potential of FMs. However, grounding FMs faces several challenges, stemming primarily from constrained computing resources, data privacy, model heterogeneity, and model ownership. Federated Transfer Learning (FTL), the combination of federated learning and transfer learning, provides promising solutions to address these challenges. Recently, the need for grounding FMs leveraging FTL, coined FTL-FM, has arisen strongly in both academia and industry. Motivated by the strong growth in FTL-FM research and the potential impact of FTL-FM on industrial applications, we propose an FTL-FM framework that formulates problems of grounding FMs in the federated learning setting, construct a detailed taxonomy based on the FTL-FM framework to categorize state-of-the-art FTL-FM works, and comprehensively overview FTL-FM works based on the proposed taxonomy. We also establish correspondence between FTL-FM and conventional phases of adapting FM so that FM practitioners can align their research works with FTL-FM. In addition, we overview advanced efficiency-improving and privacy-preserving techniques because efficiency and privacy are critical concerns in FTL-FM. Last, we discuss opportunities and future research directions of FTL-FM.

Federated Foundation Models (FedFMs) represent a distributed learning paradigm that fuses general competences of foundation models as well as privacy-preserving capabilities of federated learning. This combination allows the large foundation models and the small local domain models at the remote clients to learn from each other in a teacher-student learning setting. This paper provides a comprehensive summary of the ten challenging problems inherent in FedFMs, encompassing foundational theory, utilization of private data, continual learning, unlearning, Non-IID and graph data, bidirectional knowledge transfer, incentive mechanism design, game mechanism design, model watermarking, and efficiency. The ten challenging problems manifest in five pivotal aspects: “Foundational Theory,” which aims to establish a coherent and unifying theoretical framework for FedFMs. “Data,” addressing the difficulties in leveraging domain-specific knowledge from private data while maintaining privacy; “Heterogeneity,” examining variations in data, model, and computational resources across clients; “Security and Privacy,” focusing on defenses against malicious attacks and model theft; and “Efficiency,” highlighting the need for improvements in training, communication, and parameter efficiency. For each problem, we offer a clear mathematical definition on the objective function, analyze existing methods, and discuss the key challenges and potential solutions. This in-depth exploration aims to advance the theoretical foundations of FedFMs, guide practical implementations, and inspire future research to overcome these obstacles, thereby enabling the robust, efficient, and privacy-preserving FedFMs in various real-world applications.

Most federated learning-based recommender systems allow clients to access a well-trained high-quality model locally, which provides adversaries with the opportunity to infringe the legitimate copyright of the model. In response, we study an emerging and important problem, i.e., copyright protection of a federated recommendation model, which has not yet been addressed in the community of federated learning or recommender systems. We propose the first backdoor-based ownership verification scheme for federated recommendation (OVFR), which enables the server to claim its ownership for a given suspicious recommendation model. First, we propose to generate a trigger set tailored to recommendation scenarios. In particular, we generate some fake users and items, and then construct a set of fake users with fake interaction records as a trigger set. Moreover, we ensure that the distribution of the popularity of the fake items follows a long-tailed distribution for the effectiveness of the incorporated watermarking. To provide robustness assurance, we propose two different hybrid strategies to make the embeddings of the fake items similar to those of the real items. Second, we focus on effectively learning from a trigger set for recommendation scenarios. In particular, we design an MSE loss function and a contrastive loss function for incorporating the backdoor-based watermarking into the item embeddings, since the item embeddings are often more valuable and easier to be accessed than other parameters of a federated recommendation model. We then design a contrastive loss function to reduce the risk of the fake items being detected. Extensive experiments on three public datasets show the effectiveness of our OVFR in terms of ownership verification, model performance, and robustness.

Conventionally, federated learning aims to optimize a single objective, typically the utility. However, for a federated learning system to be trustworthy, it needs to simultaneously satisfy multiple objectives, such as maximizing model performance, minimizing privacy leakage and training costs, and being robust to malicious attacks. Multi-Objective Optimization (MOO) aiming to optimize multiple conflicting objectives simultaneously is quite suitable for solving the optimization problem of Trustworthy Federated Learning (TFL). In this article, we unify MOO and TFL by formulating the problem of constrained multi-objective federated learning (CMOFL). Under this formulation, existing MOO algorithms can be adapted to TFL straightforwardly. Different from existing CMOFL algorithms focusing on utility, efficiency, fairness, and robustness, we consider optimizing privacy leakage along with utility loss and training cost, the three primary objectives of a TFL system. We develop two improved CMOFL algorithms based on NSGA-II and PSL, respectively, to effectively and efficiently find Pareto optimal solutions and provide theoretical analysis on their convergence. We design quantitative measurements of privacy leakage, utility loss, and training cost for three privacy protection mechanisms: Randomization, BatchCrypt (an efficient homomorphic encryption), and Sparsification. Empirical experiments conducted under the three protection mechanisms demonstrate the effectiveness of our proposed algorithms.

In a federated learning scenario where multiple parties jointly learn a model from their respective data, there exist two conflicting goals for the choice of appropriate algorithms. On one hand, private and sensitive training data must be kept secure as much as possible in the presence of semi-honest partners; on the other hand, a certain amount of information has to be exchanged among different parties for the sake of learning utility. Such a challenge calls for the privacy-preserving federated learning solution, which maximizes the utility of the learned model and maintains a provable privacy guarantee of participating parties’ private data. This article illustrates a general framework that (1) formulates the trade-off between privacy loss and utility loss from a unified information-theoretic point of view, and (2) delineates quantitative bounds of the privacy-utility trade-off when different protection mechanisms including randomization, sparsity, and homomorphic encryption are used. It was shown that in general there is no free lunch for the privacy-utility trade-off , and one has to trade the preserving of privacy with a certain degree of degraded utility. The quantitative analysis illustrated in this article may serve as the guidance for the design of practical federated learning algorithms.