The emergence of large language models (LLMs) has substantially changed the artificial intelligence field, enabling its wide use over different domains. As various LLM alternatives have been developed, the current study proposes a novel decision‐support framework for evaluating and benchmarking LLMs based on multicriteria decision‐making (MCDM) techniques. In the proposed framework, an improved version of the best‐worst method (BWM) is proposed to effectively reduce the computational complexity of assigning a critical weight for the evaluation criteria of LLMs. Then, the improved BWM is integrated with the combined compromise solution (CoCoSo) method for ranking LLM alternatives. Findings show that the improved BWM successfully computes the criteria weights with low computational complexity compared to the original BWM. According to the enhanced BWM, the ‘factual errors’ criterion received the highest significant weight (0.2681), while the ‘logical inconsistencies’ criteria obtained the lowest (0.0827). The rest of the criteria were distributed in between that range. Subsequently, CoCoSo ranked the involved LLM alternatives in two different runs based on the extracted weights. Sensitivity analysis was employed to evaluate the effect of the assessment criteria on LLMs’ evaluation.

Anomaly detection in videos is challenging due to the complexity, noise, and diverse nature of activities such as violence, shoplifting, and vandalism. While deep learning (DL) has shown excellent performance in this area, existing approaches have struggled to apply DL models across different anomaly tasks without extensive retraining. This repeated retraining is time‐consuming, computationally intensive, and unfair. To address this limitation, a new DL framework is introduced in this study, consisting of three key components: transfer learning to enhance feature generalization, model fusion to improve feature representation, and multitask classification to generalize the classifier across multiple tasks without training from scratch when a new task is introduced. The framework’s main advantage is its ability to generalize without requiring retraining from scratch for each new task. Empirical evaluations demonstrate the framework’s effectiveness, achieving an accuracy of 97.99% on the RLVS (violence detection), 83.59% on the UCF dataset (shoplifting detection), and 88.37% across both datasets using a single classifier without retraining. Additionally, when tested on an unseen dataset, the framework achieved an accuracy of 87.25% and 79.39% on violence and shoplifting datasets, respectively. The study also utilises two explainability tools to identify potential biases, ensuring robustness and fairness. This research represents the first successful resolution of the generalization issue in anomaly detection, marking a significant advancement in the field.

Given the tremendous potential and influence of artificial intelligence (AI) and algorithmic decision‐making (DM), these systems have found wide‐ranging applications across diverse fields, including education, business, healthcare industries, government, and justice sectors. While AI and DM offer significant benefits, they also carry the risk of unfavourable outcomes for users and society. As a result, ensuring the safety, reliability, and trustworthiness of these systems becomes crucial. This article aims to provide a comprehensive review of the synergy between AI and DM, focussing on the importance of trustworthiness. The review addresses the following four key questions, guiding readers towards a deeper understanding of this topic: (i) why do we need trustworthy AI? (ii) what are the requirements for trustworthy AI? In line with this second question, the key requirements that establish the trustworthiness of these systems have been explained, including explainability, accountability, robustness, fairness, acceptance of AI, privacy, accuracy, reproducibility, and human agency, and oversight. (iii) how can we have trustworthy data? and (iv) what are the priorities in terms of trustworthy requirements for challenging applications? Regarding this last question, six different applications have been discussed, including trustworthy AI in education, environmental science, 5G‐based IoT networks, robotics for architecture, engineering and construction, financial technology, and healthcare. The review emphasises the need to address trustworthiness in AI systems before their deployment in order to achieve the AI goal for good. An example is provided that demonstrates how trustworthy AI can be employed to eliminate bias in human resources management systems. The insights and recommendations presented in this paper will serve as a valuable guide for AI researchers seeking to achieve trustworthiness in their applications.