Graphs have emerged as a foundation for a variety of applications, including capturing factual knowledge, semantic data integration, social networks, and informing machine learning algorithms. Formalising properties of the data and ensuring data quality requires describing schemas of such graphs. Driven by diverse applications, the Semantic Web and database communities developed not only different graph data models-RDF and property graphs-but also different graph schema languages-SHACL, ShEx, and PG-Schema. Each language has its unique approach to defining constraints and validating graph data, leaving potential users in the dark about their commonalities and differences. In this paper, we provide concise formal definitions of the core components of these languages, employ a uniform framework to facilitate a comprehensive comparison between them, and identify a common set of functionalities, shedding light on both overlapping and distinctive features.

Hypertree decompositions provide a way to evaluate Conjunctive Queries (CQs) in polynomial time, where the exponent of this polynomial is determined by the width of the decomposition. In theory, the goal of efficient CQ evaluation therefore has to be a minimisation of the width. However, in practical settings, it turns out that there are also other properties of a decomposition that influence the performance of query evaluation. It is therefore of interest to restrict the computation of decompositions by constraints and to guide this computation by preferences. To this end, we propose a novel framework based on candidate tree decompositions, which allows us to introduce soft hypertree width (shw). This width measure is a relaxation of hypertree width (hw); it is never greater than hw and, in some cases, shw may actually be lower than hw. Most importantly, shw preserves the tractability of deciding if a given CQ is below some fixed bound, while offering more algorithmic flexibility. In particular, it provides a natural way to incorporate preferences and constraints into the computation of decompositions. A prototype implementation and preliminary experiments confirm that this novel framework can indeed have a practical impact on query evaluation.

Various classic reasoning problems with natural hypergraph representations are known to be tractable if a hypertree decomposition (HD) of low width exists. The resulting algorithms are attractive for practical use in fields like databases and constraint satisfaction. However, algorithmic use of HDs relies on the difficult task of first computing a decomposition of the hypergraph underlying a given problem instance, which is then used to guide the algorithm for this particular instance. The performance of purely sequential methods for computing HDs is inherently limited, yet the problem is, theoretically, amenable to parallelisation. In this article, we propose the first algorithm for computing hypertree decompositions that is well suited for parallelisation. The newly proposed algorithm log- k -decomp requires only a logarithmic number of recursion levels and additionally allows for highly parallelised pruning of the search space by restriction to so-called balanced separators. We provide a detailed experimental evaluation over the HyperBench benchmark and demonstrate that log- k -decomp outperforms the current state of the art significantly.

Various classic reasoning problems with natural hypergraph representations are known to be tractable when a hypertree decomposition (HD) of low width exists. The resulting algorithms are attractive for practical use in fields like databases and constraint satisfaction. However, algorithmic use of HDs relies on the difficult task of first computing a decomposition of the hypergraph underlying a given problem instance, which is then used to guide the algorithm for this particular instance. The performance of purely sequential methods for computing HDs is inherently limited, yet the problem is, theoretically, amenable to parallelisation.