Chenghao Lyu

dblp:247/8274 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
5ranked-venue papers in the field
3as first author
4since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — venue-derived; a paper can count in several

Database Systems & Data Management · 5 (3 first)
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Graph Transformers for Query Plan Representation: Potentials and Challenges
Chenghao Lyu, Guillaume Lachaud, Gabriel Lozano, Yanlei Diao
Proc. VLDB Endow.1
2024 A Spark Optimizer for Adaptive, Fine-Grained Parameter Tuning
abstract
As Spark becomes a common big data analytics platform, its growing complexity makes automatic tuning of numerous parameters critical for performance. Our work on Spark parameter tuning is particularly motivated by two recent trends: Spark's Adaptive Query Execution (AQE) based on runtime statistics, and the increasingly popular Spark cloud deployments that make cost-performance reasoning crucial for the end user. This paper presents our design of a Spark optimizer that controls all tunable parameters of each query in the new AQE architecture to explore its performance benefits and, at the same time, casts the tuning problem in the theoretically sound multi-objective optimization (MOO) setting to better adapt to user cost-performance preferences. To this end, we propose a novel hybrid compile-time/runtime approach to multi-granularity tuning of diverse, correlated Spark parameters, as well as a suite of modeling and optimization techniques to solve the tuning problem in the MOO setting while meeting the stringent time constraint of 1--2 seconds for cloud use. Evaluation results using TPC-H and TPC-DS benchmarks demonstrate the superior performance of our approach: (i ) When prioritizing latency, it achieves 63% and 65% reduction for TPC-H and TPC-DS, respectively, under an average solving time of 0.7--0.8 sec, outperforming the most competitive MOO method that reduces only 18--25% latency with 2.6--15 sec solving time. (ii) When shifting preferences between latency and cost, our approach dominates the solutions of alternative methods, exhibiting superior adaptability to varying preferences.
Chenghao Lyu, Philippe Guyard, Yanlei Diao
Proc. VLDB Endow.1
2022 Fine-Grained Modeling and Optimization for Intelligent Resource Management in Big Data Processing
abstract
Big data processing at the production scale presents a highly complex environment for resource optimization (RO), a problem crucial for meeting performance goals and budgetary constraints of analytical users. The RO problem is challenging because it involves a set of decisions (the partition count, placement of parallel instances on machines, and resource allocation to each instance), requires multi-objective optimization (MOO), and is compounded by the scale and complexity of big data systems while having to meet stringent time constraints for scheduling. This paper presents a MaxCompute based integrated system to support multi-objective resource optimization via fine-grained instance-level modeling and optimization. We propose a new architecture that breaks RO into a series of simpler problems, new fine-grained predictive models, and novel optimization methods that exploit these models to make effective instance-level RO decisions well under a second. Evaluation using production workloads shows that our new RO system could reduce 37--72% latency and 43--78% cost at the same time, compared to the current optimizer and scheduler, while running in 0.02-0.23s.
Chenghao Lyu, Yanlei Diao, Wei Chen 0133, Yihui Feng, Yaliang Li, Kai Zeng 0002, Jingren Zhou 0001
Proc. VLDB Endow.1
2021 Spark-based Cloud Data Analytics using Multi-Objective Optimization
abstract
Data analytics in the cloud has become an integral part of enterprise businesses. Big data analytics systems, however, still lack the ability to take task objectives such as user performance goals and budgetary constraints and automatically configure an analytic job to achieve these objectives. This paper presents UDAO, a Spark-based Unified Data Analytics Optimizer that can automatically determine a cluster configuration with a suitable number of cores as well as other system parameters that best meet the task objectives. At a core of our work is a principled multi-objective optimization (MOO) approach that computes a Pareto optimal set of configurations to reveal tradeoffs between different objectives, recommends a new Spark configuration that best explores such tradeoffs, and employs novel optimizations to enable such recommendations within a few seconds. Detailed experiments using benchmark workloads show that our MOO techniques provide a 2-50× speedup over existing MOO methods, while offering good coverage of the Pareto frontier. Compared to Ottertune, a state-of-the-art performance tuning system, UDAO recommends Spark configurations that yield 26%-49% reduction of running time of the TPCx-BB benchmark while adapting to different user preferences on multiple objectives.
Khaled Zaouk, Chenghao Lyu, Yanlei Diao, Prashant J. Shenoy
ICDE3
2019 UDAO: A Next-Generation Unified Data Analytics Optimizer
abstract
Big data analytics systems today still lack the ability to take user performance goals and budgetary constraints, collectively referred to as "objectives", and automatically configure an analytic job to achieve the objectives. This paper presents UDAO, a unified data analytics optimizer that can automatically determine the parameters of the runtime system, collectively called a job configuration, for general dataflow programs based on user objectives. UDAO embodies key techniques including in-situ modeling , which learns a model for each user objective in the same computing environment as the job is run, and multi-objective optimization , which computes a Pareto optimal set of job configurations to reveal tradeoffs between different objectives. Using benchmarks developed based on industry needs, our demonstration will allow the user to explore (1) learned models to gain insights into how various parameters affect user objectives; (2) Pareto frontiers to understand interesting tradeoffs between different objectives and how a configuration recommended by the optimizer explores these tradeoffs; (3) end-to-end benefits that UDAO can provide over default configurations or those manually tuned by engineers.
Khaled Zaouk, Chenghao Lyu, Yanlei Diao, Prashant J. Shenoy
Proc. VLDB Endow.3