Knowledge graphs (KGs) play a crucial role in the integration and organization of heterogeneous data and knowledge, enabling advanced data analytics and decision-making across various industries. This vision paper addresses critical challenges in managing KGs, emphasizing their relevance in integrating information from disparate sources. We propose the concept of knowledge graph ecosystems and life cycles to systematically manage tasks, e.g., data integration, standardization, continuous updates, efficient querying, and provenance tracking. By adopting our approach, organizations can enhance the accuracy, consistency, and reliability of KGs, thus improving knowledge management, enabling the extraction of valuable insights, and ensuring transparency and accountability.

Reification in knowledge graphs has been present since the inception of RDF to allow capturing additional information in triples, usually metadata. The need of adopting or changing a metadata representation in a pre-existing graph to enhance the knowledge capture and access can lead to inducing complex structural changes in the graph, according the target representation’s schema. In these situations, it is necessary to decide whether to construct the knowledge graph again from its original sources, or to re-construct it using the current version of the graph. In this paper we conduct an empirical study to analyze which re-construction approach is more suitable for switching the representation approach from the created graph ensuring that the additional represented knowledge is preserved. We study four well-known metadata representations, using mapping languages to construct the graph, and SPARQL CONSTRUCT queries to re-construct it. With this work we aim to provide insights about the impact of re-construction on metadata representations interoperability and the implications of different approaches.

Abstract The Relational to RDF Mapping Language (R2RML) became a W3C Recommendation a decade ago. Despite its wide adoption, its potential applicability beyond relational databases was swiftly explored. As a result, several extensions and new mapping languages were proposed to tackle the limitations that surfaced as R2RML was applied in real-world use cases. Over the years, one of these languages, the RDF Mapping Language (RML), has gathered a large community of contributors, users, and compliant tools. So far, there has been no well-defined set of features for the mapping language, nor was there a consensus-marking ontology. Consequently, it has become challenging for non-experts to fully comprehend and utilize the full range of the language’s capabilities. After three years of work, the W3C Community Group on Knowledge Graph Construction proposes a new specification for RML. This paper presents the new modular RML ontology and the accompanying SHACL shapes that complement the specification. We discuss the motivations and challenges that emerged when extending R2RML, the methodology we followed to design the new ontology while ensuring its backward compatibility with R2RML, and the novel features which increase its expressiveness. The new ontology consolidates the potential of RML, empowers practitioners to define mapping rules for constructing RDF graphs that were previously unattainable, and allows developers to implement systems in adherence with [R2]RML. Resource type: Ontology/License: CC BY 4.0 International DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.7918478 /URL: http://w3id.org/rml/portal/

Abstract Knowledge graphs have been widely adopted across organizations and research domains, fueling applications that span interactive browsing to large-scale analysis and data science. One design decision in knowledge graph deployment is choosing a representation that optimally supports the application’s consumers. Currently, however, there is no consensus on which representations best support each consumer scenario. In this work, we analyze the fitness of popular knowledge graph representations for three consumer scenarios: knowledge exploration, systematic querying, and graph completion. We compare the accessibility for knowledge exploration through a user study with dedicated browsing interfaces and query endpoints. We assess systematic querying with SPARQL in terms of time and query complexity on both synthetic and real-world datasets. We measure the impact of various representations on the popular graph completion task by training graph embedding models per representation. We experiment with four representations: Standard Reification, N-Ary Relationships, Wikidata qualifiers, and RDF-star. We find that Qualifiers and RDF-star are better suited to support use cases of knowledge exploration and systematic querying, while Standard Reification models perform most consistently for embedding model inference tasks but may become cumbersome for users. With this study, we aim to provide novel insights into the relevance of the representation choice and its impact on common knowledge graph consumption scenarios.