Researchers in Mining (open-source) Software Repositories (MSR) often create datasets that should survive the single paper and support long-term investigation of specific phenomena. Although popular, these studies recurrently deal with similar technical limitations. For instance, public collaborative development platforms, such as GitHub, impose hourly rate limits on their API requests. Furthermore, depending on network and API conditions, queries can fail and disrupt the process. These unexpected events can slow down or even invalidate the mining. Nevertheless, there are ways to minimize the undesirable effects in a reusable way while still complying with such limitations. However, best practices are often (re-)implemented on an ad hoc basis. Whatever works.

Automated Code Revision (ACR) tools aim to reduce manual effort by automatically generating code revisions based on reviewer feedback. While ACR tools have shown promising performance on historical data, their real-world utility depends on their ability to handle similar code variants expressing the same issue—a property we define as consistency. However, the probabilistic nature of ACR tools often compromises consistency, which may lead to divergent revisions even for semantically equivalent code variants.

In the rapidly evolving landscape of web services, the significance of efficiently designed and well-documented APIs is paramount. In this paper, we present APIstic an API analytics dataset and exploration tool to navigate and segment APIs based on an extensive set of pre-computed metrics extracted from OpenAPI specifications, sourced from GitHub, SwaggerHub, BigQuery and APIs.guru. These pre-computed metrics are categorized into structure, data model, natural language description, and security metrics. The extensive dataset of varied API metrics provides crucial insights into API design and documentation for both researchers and practitioners. Researchers can use APIstic as an empirical resource to extract refined samples, analyze API design trends, best practices, smells, and patterns. For API designers, it serves as a benchmarking tool to assess, compare, and improve API structures, data models, and documentation using metrics to select points of references among 1,275,568 valid OpenAPI specifications. The paper discusses potential use cases of the collected data and presents a descriptive analysis of selected API analytics metrics.