EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Nikolaos Myrtakis
dblp:287/7097
· DBLP profile ↗
5ranked-venue papers in the field
4as first author
5since 2021 · last 2026
0000-0002-9575-087XORCID · corroborated
Domains — venue-derived; a paper can count in several
Database Systems & Data Management · 4 (3 first)Data Mining & Knowledge Discovery · 1 (1 first)
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | EDDI: Explaining Data Drift Using InfluenceabstractInternational audience Nikolaos Myrtakis, Andrea Castellani, Ioannis Tsamardinos, Vassilis Christophides |
ICDE | 1 |
| 2025 | Data Glitches Discovery using Influence-based Model ExplanationsabstractWe address the problem of detecting data glitches in ML training sets, specifically mislabeled and anomalous samples. Detection of data glitches provides insights into the quality of the data sampling. Their repair may improve the reliability and the performance of the model. The proposed methodology is based on exploiting influence functions that estimate how much the loss of the model (or a given sample) is affected when a sample is removed from the training set. We introduce three novel signals for detecting, characterizing, and repairing data glitches in a training set based on sample influences. Influence-based signals form an explainable-by-design data glitch detection framework, producing intuitively explainable signals of the actual predictive model built. In contrast, specialized algorithms that are agnostic to the target ML model (e.g., anomaly detectors) replicate the work of fitting the data distribution and may detect glitches that are inconsistent with the decision boundary of the predictive model. Computational experiments on tabular and image data modalities demonstrate that the proposed signals outperform, in some cases up to a factor of 6, all existing influence-based signals, and generalize across different datasets and ML models. In addition, they often outperform specialized glitch detectors (e.g., mislabeled and anomaly detectors) and provide accurate label repairs for mislabeled samples. Nikolaos Myrtakis, Ioannis Tsamardinos, Vassilis Christophides |
KDD (1) | 1 |
| 2023 | A meta-level analysis of online anomaly detectors
Antonios Ntroumpogiannis, Michail Giannoulis, Nikolaos Myrtakis, Vassilis Christophides, Eric Simon, Ioannis Tsamardinos |
VLDB J. | 3 |
| 2021 | A Comparative Evaluation of Anomaly Explanation AlgorithmsabstractInternational audience Nikolaos Myrtakis, Vassilis Christophides, Eric Simon |
EDBT | 1 |
| 2021 | PROTEUS: Predictive Explanation of AnomaliesabstractNumerous algorithms have been proposed for detecting anomalies (outliers, novelties) in an unsupervised manner. Unfortunately, it is not trivial, in general, to understand why a given sample (record) is labelled as an anomaly and thus diagnose its root causes. We propose the following reduced-dimensionality, surrogate model approach to explain detector decisions: approximate the detection model with another one that employs only a small subset of features. Subsequently, samples can be visualized in this low-dimensionality space for human understanding. To this end, we develop PROTEUS, an AutoML pipeline to produce the surrogate model, specifically designed for feature selection on imbalanced datasets. The PROTEUS surrogate model can not only explain the training data, but also the out-of-sample (unseen) data. In other words, PROTEUS produces predictive explanations by approximating the decision surface of an unsupervised detector. PROTEUS is designed to return an accurate estimate of out-of-sample predictive performance to serve as a metric of the quality of the approximation. Computational experiments confirm the efficacy of PROTEUS to produce predictive explanations for different families of detectors and to reliably estimate their predictive performance in unseen data. Unlike several ad-hoc feature importance methods, PROTEUS is robust to high-dimensional data. Nikolaos Myrtakis, Ioannis Tsamardinos, Vassilis Christophides |
ICDE | 1 |