Decision-making in real-world settings rarely follows a fixed script. Instead, it unfolds as a dynamic reasoning process in which the appropriate course of action evolves as new context and data become available. Traditional Business Process Management systems provide rigor, determinism, and auditability, yet they generally struggle to adapt their execution at runtime. Conversely, agentic systems based on Large Language Models (LLMs) bring flexibility to decision-making, but they are inherently opaque, often unreliable, and suffer from significant scalability constraints when operating over large datasets. To combine these complementary paradigms, we introduce VADAOrchestra, a neurosymbolic framework that models complex workflows as evolving reasoning processes. The framework adopts a hybrid approach: given a user query and a collection of data sources, an LLM-based orchestrator incrementally plans and adapts the workflow. This is encoded as a logic program in a fragment of Datalog+/- where predicates correspond to tool invocations and rules represent both predefined domain dependencies and logic constructs synthesized on demand to manipulate intermediate results. All logical inference tasks are then executed by a state-of-the-art Datalog+/- symbolic engine. This approach provides a verifiable reasoning trace, supporting the auditability and reproducibility of the entire process. Furthermore, by decoupling high-level orchestration from symbolic inference, it addresses scalability concerns, enabling complex reasoning over large datasets through targeted data querying. We evaluate VADAOrchestra on real-world financial use cases, demonstrating faithfulness, scalability, and explainability compared to standard agentic architectures.

In the modern data-driven world, answering queries over heterogeneous and semantically inconsistent data remains a significant challenge. Modern datasets originate from diverse sources, such as relational databases, semi-structured repositories, and unstructured documents, leading to substantial variability in schemas, terminologies, and data formats. Traditional systems, constrained by rigid syntactic matching and strict data binding, struggle to capture critical semantic connections and schema ambiguities, failing to meet the growing demand among data scientists for advanced forms of flexibility and context-awareness in query answering. In parallel, the advent of Large Language Models (LLMs) has introduced new capabilities in natural language interpretation, making them highly promising for addressing such challenges. However, LLMs alone lack the systematic rigor and explainability required for robust query processing and decision-making in high-stakes domains. In this paper, we propose Soft Query Answering (Soft QA), a novel hybrid approach that integrates LLMs as an intermediate semantic layer within the query processing pipeline. Soft QA enhances query answering adaptability and flexibility by injecting semantic understanding through context-aware, schema-informed prompts, and leverages LLMs to semantically link entities, resolve ambiguities, and deliver accurate query results in complex settings. We demonstrate its practical effectiveness through real-world examples, highlighting its ability to resolve semantic mismatches and improve query outcomes without requiring extensive data cleaning or restructuring.