Ahmed S. Nassar

dblp:321/9993 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers in the field
0as first author
4since 2021 · last 2026
0000-0002-9468-0822ORCID · reported

Domains — venue-derived; a paper can count in several

Other / Interdisciplinary · 3Data Mining & Knowledge Discovery · 1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 Identify, Locate, Link: End-to-End Key-Value Extraction from Document Images
A. Said Gurbuz, Ahmed S. Nassar, Christoph Auer, Maksym Lysak, Lucas Morin, Matteo Omenetti, Tim Strohmeyer, Panagiotis Vagenas, Nikolaos Livathinos, Michele Dolfi, Peter W. J. Staar
ICDAR (2)2
2023 ICDAR 2023 Competition on Robust Layout Segmentation in Corporate Documents
Christoph Auer, Ahmed S. Nassar, Maksym Lysak, Michele Dolfi, Nikolaos Livathinos, Peter W. J. Staar
ICDAR (2)2
2023 Optimized Table Tokenization for Table Structure Recognition
Maksym Lysak, Ahmed S. Nassar, Nikolaos Livathinos, Christoph Auer, Peter W. J. Staar
ICDAR (2)2
2022 DocLayNet: A Large Human-Annotated Dataset for Document-Layout Segmentation
abstract
Accurate document layout analysis is a key requirement for high-quality PDF document conversion. With the recent availability of public, large ground-truth datasets such as PubLayNet and DocBank, deep-learning models have proven to be very effective at layout detection and segmentation. While these datasets are of adequate size to train such models, they severely lack in layout variability since they are sourced from scientific article repositories such as PubMed and arXiv only. Consequently, the accuracy of the layout segmentation drops significantly when these models are applied on more challenging and diverse layouts. In this paper, we presentDocLayNet, a new, publicly available, document-layout annotation dataset in COCO format. It contains 80863 manually annotated pages from diverse data sources to represent a wide variability in layouts. For each PDF page, the layout annotations provide labelled bounding-boxes with a choice of 11 distinct classes. DocLayNet also provides a subset of double- and triple-annotated pages to determine the inter-annotator agreement. In multiple experiments, we provide baseline accuracy scores (in mAP) for a set of popular object detection models. We also demonstrate that these models fall approximately 10% behind the inter-annotator agreement. Furthermore, we provide evidence that DocLayNet is of sufficient size. Lastly, we compare models trained on PubLayNet, DocBank and DocLayNet, showing that layout predictions of the DocLayNet-trained models are more robust and thus the preferred choice for general-purpose document-layout analysis.
Birgit Pfitzmann, Christoph Auer, Michele Dolfi, Ahmed S. Nassar, Peter W. J. Staar
KDD4