LLM-based chatbots are increasingly augmented with retrieval mechanisms operating over web-scale corpora. Evaluating the effectiveness of these retrieval components is challenging, as explicit relevance judgments are often unavailable. Query performance prediction (QPP) addresses this limitation by providing unsupervised estimates of retrieval effectiveness. However, existing QPP methods assume a static corpus and do not account for the impact of corpus growth on query performance. In this work, we extend the QPP paradigm by studying query performance degradation under corpus inflation in dense retrieval systems. Using tiered corpora with fixed relevance judgments, we analyze how query effectiveness evolves as the corpus (index) size increases and evaluate the ability of established score-based and embedding-based post-retrieval QPP methods to predict such degradation. Our findings show that the reliability of these predictors is dependent on the dataset. We propose simple adaptations to established QPP measures, most notably a top-k vs background Wasserstein distance measure, which yield more consistent associations with degradation and outperform their original counterparts. These findings highlight limitations of several QPP approaches in large-scale, continuously expanding retrieval environments and motivate the development of corpus-growth-aware QPP measures.

We introduce WebFAQ 2.0, a new version of the WebFAQ dataset, containing 198 million FAQ-based natural question-answer pairs across 108 languages. Compared to the previous version, it significantly expands multilingual coverage and the number of bilingual aligned QA pairs to over 14.3M, making it the largest FAQ-based resource. Unlike the original release, WebFAQ 2.0 uses a novel data collection strategy that directly crawls and extracts relevant web content, resulting in a substantially more diverse and multilingual dataset with richer context through page titles and descriptions. In response to community feedback, we also release a hard negatives dataset for training dense retrievers, with 1.25M queries across 20 languages. These hard negatives were mined using a two-stage retrieval pipeline and include cross-encoder scores for 200 negatives per query. We further show how this resource enables two primary fine-tuning strategies for dense retrievers: Contrastive Learning with MultipleNegativesRanking loss, and Knowledge Distillation with MarginMSE loss.

We present WebFAQ, a large-scale collection of open-domain question answering datasets derived from FAQ-style schema.org annotations. In total, the data collection consists of 96 million natural question-answer (QA) pairs across 75 languages, including 47 million (49%) non-English samples. WebFAQ further serves as the foundation for 49 monolingual retrieval benchmarks with a total size of 11.2 million QA pairs (5.9 million non-English). These datasets are carefully curated through refined filtering and near-duplicate detection, yielding high-quality resources for training and evaluating multilingual dense retrieval models. To empirically confirm WebFAQ's efficacy, we use the collected QAs to fine-tune an in-domain pretrained XLM-RoBERTa model. Through this process of dataset-specific fine-tuning, the model achieves significant retrieval performance gains, which generalize - beyond WebFAQ - to other multilingual retrieval benchmarks evaluated in zero-shot setting. Last but not least, we utilize WebFAQ to construct a set of QA-aligned bilingual corpora spanning over 1000 language pairs using state-of-the-art bitext mining and automated LLM-assessed translation evaluation. Due to our advanced, automated method of bitext dataset generation, the resulting bilingual corpora demonstrate higher translation quality compared to similar datasets. WebFAQ and all associated resources are publicly available on GitHub and HuggingFace.