Optimizing maritime operations, particularly fuel consumption for vessels, is crucial, considering its significant share in global trade. As fuel consumption is closely related to the shaft power of a vessel, predicting shaft power accurately is a crucial problem that requires careful consideration to minimize costs and emissions. Traditional approaches, which incorporate empirical formulas, often struggle to model dynamic conditions, such as sea conditions or fouling on vessels. In this paper, we present a hybrid, physics-guided neural network-based approach that utilizes empirical formulas within the network to combine the advantages of both neural networks and traditional techniques. We evaluate the presented method using data obtained from four similar-sized cargo vessels and compare the results with those of a baseline neural network and a traditional approach that employs empirical formulas. The experimental results demonstrate that the physics-guided neural network approach achieves lower mean absolute error, root mean square error, and mean absolute percentage error for all tested vessels compared to both the empirical formula-based method and the base neural network.

Automating the detection of regulatory compliance remains a challenging task due to the complexity and variability of legal texts. Models trained on one regulation often fail to generalise to others. This limitation underscores the need for principled methods to improve cross-domain transfer. We study data selection as a strategy to mitigate negative transfer in compliance detection framed as a natural language inference (NLI) task. Specifically, we evaluate four approaches for selecting augmentation data from a larger source domain: random sampling, Moore-Lewis's cross-entropy difference, importance weighting, and embedding-based retrieval. We systematically vary the proportion of selected data to analyse its effect on cross-domain adaptation. Our findings demonstrate that targeted data selection substantially reduces negative transfer, offering a practical path toward scalable and reliable compliance automation across heterogeneous regulations.

Causal Neural Network models have shown high levels of robustness to adversarial attacks as well as an increased capacity for generalisation tasks such as few-shot learning and rare-context classification compared to traditional Neural Networks. This robustness is argued to stem from the disentanglement of causal and confounder input signals. However, no quantitative study has yet measured the level of disentanglement achieved by these types of causal models or assessed how this relates to their adversarial robustness.