EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Jiong Zhu
dblp:51/8525
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers in the field
2as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0002-6145-3295ORCID · corroborated
Domains — venue-derived; a paper can count in several
Data Mining & Knowledge Discovery · 4 (2 first)
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Simplifying Distributed Neural Network Training on Massive Graphs: Randomized Partitions Improve Model AggregationabstractDistributed graph neural network (GNN) training facilitates learning on massive graphs that surpass the storage and computational capabilities of a single machine. Traditional distributed frameworks strive for performance parity with centralized training by maximally recovering cross-instance node dependencies, relying either on inter-instance communication or periodic fallback to centralized training. However, these processes create overhead and constrain the scalability of the framework. In this work, we propose a streamlined framework for distributed GNN training that eliminates these costly operations, yielding improved scalability, convergence speed, and performance over state-of-the-art approaches. Our framework (1) comprises independent trainers that asynchronously learn local models from locally available parts of the training graph and (2) synchronizes these local models only through periodic (time-based) model aggregation. Contrary to prevailing belief, our theoretical analysis shows that it is not essential to maximize the recovery of cross-instance node dependencies to achieve performance parity with centralized training. Instead, our framework leverages randomized assignment of nodes or super-nodes (i.e., collections of original nodes) to partition the training graph in order to enhance data uniformity and minimize discrepancies in gradient and loss function across instances. Experiments on social and e-commerce networks with up to 1.3 billion edges show that our proposed framework achieves state-of-the-art performance and 2.31 \(\times\) speedup compared to the fastest baseline despite using less training data. Jiong Zhu, Aishwarya Reganti, Edward W. Huang, Charles Dickens, Nikhil Rao 0001, Karthik Subbian, Danai Koutra |
ACM Trans. Knowl. Discov. Data | 1 |
| 2023 | The 3rd Workshop on Graph Learning Benchmarks (GLB 2023)abstractRecent years have witnessed a surge of research interest in graph machine learning. However, the benchmark datasets available to the field are rather limited in both quantity and diversity, an issue particularly notable given the immense potential applications of graph learning. The lack of diverse benchmark datasets may have biased the development of graph machine learning techniques towards narrow directions. By crowdsourcing novel tasks and datasets, this workshop aims to increase the diversity of graph learning benchmarks, identify new demands of graph machine learning in general, and gain a better synergy of how concrete techniques perform on these benchmarks. Moreover, this workshop offers a platform for discussions of best practices in curating graph learning benchmarks and data-centric approaches for graph learning. Jiaqi W. Ma, Jiong Zhu, Yuxiao Dong, Danai Koutra, Jingrui He, Qiaozhu Mei, Anton Tsitsulin, Xingjian Zhang 0002, Marinka Zitnik |
KDD | 2 |
| 2022 | How does Heterophily Impact the Robustness of Graph Neural Networks?: Theoretical Connections and Practical ImplicationsabstractWe bridge two research directions on graph neural networks (GNNs), by formalizing the relation between heterophily of node labels (i.e., connected nodes tend to have dissimilar labels) and the robustness of GNNs to adversarial attacks. Our theoretical and empirical analyses show that for homophilous graph data, impactful structural attacks always lead to reduced homophily, while for heterophilous graph data the change in the homophily level depends on the node degrees. These insights have practical implications for defending against attacks on real-world graphs: we deduce that separate aggregators for ego- and neighbor-embeddings, a design principle which has been identified to significantly improve prediction for heterophilous graph data, can also offer increased robustness to GNNs. Our comprehensive experiments show that GNNs merely adopting this design achieve improved empirical and certifiable robustness compared to the best-performing unvaccinated model. Additionally, combining this design with explicit defense mechanisms against adversarial attacks leads to an improved robustness with up to 18.33% performance increase under attacks compared to the best-performing vaccinated model. Jiong Zhu, Junchen Jin, Donald Loveland, Michael T. Schaub, Danai Koutra |
KDD | 1 |
| 2019 | GroupINN: Grouping-based Interpretable Neural Network for Classification of Limited, Noisy Brain DataabstractMapping the human brain, or understanding how certain brain regions relate to specific aspects of cognition, has been and remains an active area of neuroscience research. Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data---in the form of images, time series or graphs---are central in this research, but pose many challenges in phenotype prediction tasks (e.g., noisy, small training samples). Standardly employed handcrafted models and newly proposed neural network methods pose limitations in the expressive power and interpretability, respectively, in this context. In this work focusing on fMRI-derived brain graphs, a modality that partially handles some challenges of fMRI data, we propose a grouping-based interpretable neural network model, GroupINN, that effectively classifies cognitive performance with 85% fewer model parameters than baseline deep models, while also identifying the most predictive brain subnetworks within several task-specific contexts. Our method incorporates the idea of node grouping into the design of the neural network. That way, unlike other methods that employ clustering as a preprocessing step to reorder nodes, GroupINN learns the node grouping and extracts graph features jointly. Experiments on task-based fMRI datasets show that our method is $2.6-69\times$ faster than other deep models, while achieving comparable or better accuracy and providing interpretability. Yujun Yan, Jiong Zhu, Marlena Duda, Eric Solarz, Chandra Sekhar Sripada, Danai Koutra |
KDD | 2 |