Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) systems are increasingly central to robust AI, enhancing large language model (LLM) faithfulness by incorporating external knowledge. However, our study unveils a critical, overlooked vulnerability: their profound susceptibility to subtle symbolic perturbations, particularly through near-imperceptible emotional icons (e.g., "(@_@)") that can catastrophically mislead retrieval, termed EmoRAG. We demonstrate that injecting a single emoticon into a query makes it nearly 100% likely to retrieve semantically unrelated texts, which contain a matching emoticon. Our extensive experiment across general question-answering and code domains, using a range of state-of-the-art retrievers and generators, reveals three key findings: (I) Single-Emoticon Disaster: Minimal emoticon injections cause maximal disruptions, with a single emoticon almost 100% dominating RAG output. (II) Positional Sensitivity: Placing an emoticon at the beginning of a query can cause severe perturbation, with F1-Scores exceeding 0.92 across all datasets. (III) Parameter-Scale Vulnerability: Counterintuitively, models with larger parameters exhibit greater vulnerability to the interference. We provide an in-depth analysis to uncover the underlying mechanisms of these phenomena. Furthermore, we raise a critical concern regarding the robustness assumption of current RAG systems, envisioning a threat scenario where an adversary exploits this vulnerability to manipulate the RAG system. We evaluate standard defenses and find them insufficient against EmoRAG. To address this, we propose targeted defenses, analyzing their strengths and limitations in mitigating emoticon-based perturbations. Finally, we outline future directions for building robust RAG systems.

Researching genes and their interactions is crucial for deciphering the fundamental laws of cellular activity, advancing disease treatment, drug discovery, and more. Large language Models (LLMs), with their profound text comprehension and generation capabilities, have made significant strides across various natural science fields. However, their application in cell biology remains limited and a systematic evaluation of their performance is lacking. To address this gap, in this article, we select seven mainstream LLMs and evaluate their performance across nine gene-related problem scenarios. Our findings indicate that LLMs possess a certain level of understanding of genes and cells, but still lag behind domain-specific models in comprehending transcriptional expression profiles. Moreover, we have improved the current method of textual representation of cells, enhancing the LLMs’ ability to tackle cell annotation tasks. We encourage cell biology researchers to leverage LLMs for problem-solving while being mindful of the associated challenges. We release our code and data at https://github.com/epang-ucas/Evaluate_LLMs_to_Genes .

Large Language Models (LLMs) have showcased exceptional capabilities in various domains, attracting significant interest from both academia and industry. Despite their impressive performance, the substantial size and computational demands of LLMs pose considerable challenges for practical deployment, particularly in environments with limited resources. The endeavor to compress language models while maintaining their accuracy has become a focal point of research. Among the various methods, knowledge distillation has emerged as an effective technique to enhance inference speed without greatly compromising performance. This article presents a thorough survey from three aspects: method, evaluation, and application, exploring knowledge distillation techniques tailored specifically for LLMs. Specifically, we divide the methods into white-box KD and black-box KD to better illustrate their differences. Furthermore, we also explored the evaluation tasks and distillation effects between different distillation methods and proposed directions for future research. Through in-depth understanding of the latest advancements and practical applications, this survey provides valuable resources for researchers, paving the way for sustained progress in this field.

Zero-Shot Hashing (ZSH) has aroused significant attention due to its efficiency and generalizability in multi-modal retrieval scenarios, which aims to encode semantic information into hash codes without needing unseen labeled training samples. In addition to commonly used visual images as visual semantics and class labels as global semantics, the corresponding attribute descriptions contain critical local semantics with detailed information. However, most existing methods focus on leveraging the extracted attribute numerical values, without exploring the textual semantics in attribute descriptions. To bridge this gap, in this paper, we propose Prompt-based zero-shot hashing via vIsual and teXtual sEmantic aLignment, namely PIXEL. Concretely, we design the attribute prompt template depending on attribute descriptions to make the model capture the corresponding local semantics. Then, achieving the textual embedding and visual embedding, we proposed an alignment module to model the intra- and inter-class contrastive distances. In addition, the attribute-wise constraint and class-wise constraint are utilized to collaboratively learn the hash code, image representation, and visual attributes more effectively. Finally, extensive experimental results demonstrate the superiority of PIXEL.

The distribution shifts between training and test data typically undermine the performance of models. In recent years, lots of work pays attention to domain generalization (DG) where distribution shifts exist and target data are unseen. Despite the progress in algorithm design, two foundational factors have long been ignored: 1) the optimization for regularization-based objectives, and 2) the model selection for DG since no knowledge about the target domain can be utilized. In this paper, we propose Mixup guided optimization and selection techniques for DG. For optimization, we utilize an adapted Mixup to generate an out-of-distribution dataset that can guide the preference direction and optimize with Pareto optimization. For model selection, we generate a validation dataset with a closer distance to the target distribution, and thereby it can better represent the target data. We also present some theoretical insights behind our proposals. Comprehensive experiments demonstrate that our model optimization and selection techniques can largely improve the performance of existing domain generalization algorithms and even achieve new state-of-the-art results.

Large language models (LLMs) are gaining increasing popularity in both academia and industry, owing to their unprecedented performance in various applications. As LLMs continue to play a vital role in both research and daily use, their evaluation becomes increasingly critical, not only at the task level, but also at the society level for better understanding of their potential risks. Over the past years, significant efforts have been made to examine LLMs from various perspectives. This paper presents a comprehensive review of these evaluation methods for LLMs, focusing on three key dimensions: what to evaluate , where to evaluate , and how to evaluate . Firstly, we provide an overview from the perspective of evaluation tasks, encompassing general natural language processing tasks, reasoning, medical usage, ethics, education, natural and social sciences, agent applications, and other areas. Secondly, we answer the ‘where’ and ‘how’ questions by diving into the evaluation methods and benchmarks, which serve as crucial components in assessing the performance of LLMs. Then, we summarize the success and failure cases of LLMs in different tasks. Finally, we shed light on several future challenges that lie ahead in LLMs evaluation. Our aim is to offer invaluable insights to researchers in the realm of LLMs evaluation, thereby aiding the development of more proficient LLMs. Our key point is that evaluation should be treated as an essential discipline to better assist the development of LLMs. We consistently maintain the related open-source materials at: https://github.com/MLGroupJLU/LLM-eval-survey

Federated learning (FL) is important for privacy-preserving services by training models without collecting raw user data. Most FL algorithms assume all data is annotated, which is impractical due to the high cost of labeling data in real applications. To alleviate the reliance on labeled data, semi-supervised federated learning (SSFL) has been proposed to utilize unlabeled data on clients to improve model performance. However, most existing methods either have privacy issues which share models trained on other clients, or generate pseudo-labels for unlabeled local datasets with the global model, which is usually biased towards the global data distribution. The latter may lead to sub-optimal accuracy of pseudo-labels, due to the gap between the local data distribution and the global model, especially in non-IID settings. In this paper, we propose a semi-supervised heterogeneous federated learning method with local knowledge enhancement, called FedLoKe, which aims to train an accurate global model from both labeled and unlabeled local data with non-IID distributions. Specifically, in FedLoKe, the server maintains a global model to capture global data distribution, and each client learns a local model to capture local data distribution. Since the distribution captured by the local model is aligned with the local data distribution, we utilize it to generate high-accuracy pseudo-labels of the unlabeled dataset for global model training. To prevent the local model from severely overfitting the small number of local labeled data, we further use the exponential moving average and apply the global model to generate pseudo-labels for local modeling training. Experiments on four datasets show the effectiveness of FedLoKe. Our code is available at: https://github.com/zcfinal/FedLoKe.