Arnon Sturm

dblp:60/1141 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
11ranked-venue papers in the field
1as first author
3since 2021 · last 2023
0000-0002-4021-7752ORCID · verified

Domains — venue-derived; a paper can count in several

Database Systems & Data Management · 5Business Process & Enterprise Data · 5 (1 first)Other / Interdisciplinary · 1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2023 Designing NoSQL databases based on multiple requirement views
Noa Roy-Hubara, Arnon Sturm, Peretz Shoval
Data Knowl. Eng.2
2022 Selecting databases for Polyglot Persistence applications
Noa Roy-Hubara, Peretz Shoval, Arnon Sturm
Data Knowl. Eng.3
2021 Model-Based Knowledge Searching
Maxim Bragilovski, Yifat Makias, Moran Shamshila, Roni Stern, Arnon Sturm
ER5
2017 The challenge of real-time multi-agent systems for enabling IoT and CPS
abstract
Techniques originating from the Internet of Things (IoT) and Cyber-Physical Systems (CPS) areas have extensively been applied to develop intelligent and pervasive systems such as assistive monitoring, feedback in telerehabilitation, energy management, and negotiation. Those application domains particularly include three major characteristics: intelligence, autonomy and real-time behavior. Multi-Agent Systems (MAS) are one of the major technological paradigms that are used to implement such systems. However, they mainly address the first two characteristics, but miss to comply with strict timing constraints. The timing compliance is crucial for safety-critical applications operating in domains such as healthcare and automotive. The main reasons for this lack of real-time satisfiability in MAS originate from current theories, standards, and technological implementations. In particular, internal agent schedulers, communication middlewares, and negotiation protocols have been identified as co-factors inhibiting the real-time compliance. This paper provides an analysis of such MAS components and pave the road for achieving the MAS compliance with strict timing constraints, thus fostering reliability and predictability.
Davide Calvaresi, Mauro Marinoni, Arnon Sturm, Michael Schumacher 0001, Giorgio C. Buttazzo
WI3
2015 Design Dimensions for Business Process Architecture
Alexei Lapouchnian, Eric S. K. Yu, Arnon Sturm
ER3
2013 Comparing functionality of software systems: An ontological approach
Iris Reinhartz-Berger, Arnon Sturm, Yair Wand
Data Knowl. Eng.2
2011 External Variability of Software: Classification and Ontological Foundations
Iris Reinhartz-Berger, Arnon Sturm, Yair Wand
ER2
2008 From conceptual models to schemata: An object-process-based data warehouse construction method
Dov Dori, Roman Feldman, Arnon Sturm
Inf. Syst.3
2008 Enhancing UML Models: A Domain Analysis Approach
abstract
UML has been largely adopted as a standard modeling language. The emergence of UML from different modeling languages that refer to various system aspects causes a wide variety of completeness and correctness problems in UML models. Several methods have been proposed for dealing with correctness issues, mainly providing internal consistency rules but ignoring correctness and completeness with respect to the system requirements and the domain constraints. In this article, we propose addressing both completeness and correctness problems of UML models by adopting a domain analysis approach called application-based domain modeling (ADOM). We present experimental results from our study which checks the quality of application models when utilizing ADOM on UML. The results advocate that the availability of the domain model helps achieve more complete models without reducing the comprehension of these models.
Iris Reinhartz-Berger, Arnon Sturm
J. Database Manag.2
2004 Applying the Application-Based Domain Modeling Approach to UML Structural Views
Arnon Sturm, Iris Reinhartz-Berger
ER1
2003 Developing Complex Systems with Object-Process Methodology Using OPCAT
Dov Dori, Iris Reinhartz-Berger, Arnon Sturm
ER3