In industrial production processes, disruptions within the industrial chain can severely affect the collaborative capabilities of production agents. A notable example occurred during the COVID-19 pandemic, when many agents faced interruption risks and were unable to participate in coordinated production. Ensuring continuity under such conditions requires migrating tasks from disrupted agents to viable alternatives. Designing effective task migration strategies, however, must account for the emergent multiplex nature of modern industrial chains. In these multiplex networked industrial chains, disruption risk in one layer can propagate to others, generating cascading failures across the system. This introduces two key challenges: (1) disruption risk creates mismatches not only between product agents and tasks but also across network layers, enlarging the problem dimensionality; and (2) simultaneous disruptions across multiple agents and layers increase the volume of tasks needing migration, greatly expanding the solution space. To address these challenges, we introduce the notion of a multiplex potential field, which captures cross-layer interdependencies and system-level dynamics in multiplex industrial chains. Building on this concept, we develop a hierarchical contextual task migration algorithm that exploits the multiplex potential field to guide both inter-layer and intra-layer task reallocations. Extensive experiments show that our approach consistently achieves superior utility, markedly improves task completion ratios, and reduces execution costs compared to benchmark algorithms. Furthermore, it attains solution quality comparable to that of the optimal CPLEX solver while requiring substantially less computation time. Finally, a case study on the FAO international food trade network demonstrates that the proposed framework is not only theoretically robust but also practically effective when deployed on large-scale real-world multiplex systems.

Sybil attacks are a prevalent concern within the realm of crowdsourcing, underscoring the significance of quality control in this domain. Truth discovery has been extensively studied to deduce the most trustworthy information from conflicting data based on the principle that reliable workers yield reliable answers. However, existing truth discovery approaches overlook the metric of workers' reputations, e.g., workers' historical approval rates on crowdsourcing platforms, despite being inflated and noisy, they offer a rough indication of workers' ability. In this paper, we first refine the approval rate using Wilson Lower Bound to enhance its confidence, and then mitigate its noise and inflation through a method based on ranking similarity. Specifically, we propose a method called RCTD (Reputation-Constrained Truth Discovery), which introduces a similarity metric between the rankings of workers' weights and the refined approval rates. This metric serves as a penalizing factor in the objective function of the truth discovery, restricting workers' weights to avoid excessively deviating from their historical reputation during the weight estimation process. We solve the objective function by introducing the block coordinate descent coupled with heuristics approach method. Experimental results on real-world datasets demonstrate that our approach achieves more accurate inference of true results in the Sybil attack environment compared to the state-of-the-art methods.

Multiple-instance learning (MIL) solves the problem where training instances are grouped in bags, and a binary (positive or negative) label is provided for each bag. Most of the existing MIL studies need fully labeled bags for training an effective classifier, while it could be quite hard to collect such data in many real-world scenarios, due to the high cost of data labeling process. Fortunately, unlike fully labeled data, triplet comparison data can be collected in a more accurate and human-friendly way. Therefore, in this article, we for the first time investigate MIL from only triplet comparison bags , where a triplet (X a , X b , X c ) contains the weak supervision information that bag X a is more similar to X b than to X c . To solve this problem, we propose to train a bag-level classifier by the empirical risk minimization framework and theoretically provide a generalization error bound. We also show that a convex formulation can be obtained only when specific convex binary losses such as the square loss and the double hinge loss are used. Extensive experiments validate that our proposed method significantly outperforms other baselines.

As an essential problem in robotics, foraging means that robots collect objects from a given environment and return them to a specified location. On many occasions, robots are required to perform foraging tasks in adversarial environments, such as battlefield rescue, where potential adversaries may damage robots with a certain probability. The longer an individual robot moves through adversarial environments, the higher the probability of being damaged by adversaries. The robot system can gain utility only when the robot brings carried objects back to a predetermined home station. Such a risk of being damaged makes returning home at different locations potentially relevant to the expected utility produced by the robot. Thus, the individual robot faces a dilemma when it responds to the potential risks in adversarial environments: whether to return the carried resources home or continue foraging tasks. In this article, two fundamental environment settings are discussed, homogeneous cases and heterogeneous cases. The former is analyzed as having both the optimal substructure property and the non-aftereffect property. Then, we present a dynamic programming (DP) algorithm that can find an optimal solution with polynomial time complexity. For the latter, it is proven that finding an optimal solution is \( \mathcal {NP} \) -hard. We then propose a heuristic algorithm: A division hierarchical path planning (DHPP) algorithm that is based on the idea of dividing the foraging routes generated initially into a certain number of subroutes to dilute risks. Finally, these algorithms are extensively evaluated in simulations, concluding that in adversarial environments, they can significantly improve the productivity of an individual robot before it is damaged.