Deciding when to stop reviewing the results of a search is a common problem with multiple applications. Existing stopping rules developed within Technology-Assisted Review (TAR) aim to achieve a pre-specified recall target and do not take into account the reason for examining the results, potentially leading to sub-optimal recommendations. This paper applies decision theory to the problem and uses it to derive three practical stopping policies based on the Expected Value of Perfect Information. The approach is applied to two professional search tasks: patent examining and systematic reviewing. Experiments on CLEF-IP and medical systematic review datasets show that the proposed approach generally produces more appropriate stopping decisions than existing methods, as demonstrated by higher net utility under the evaluated cost and payoff settings.

Technology Assisted Review stopping methods aim to ensure that no more documents are screened than necessary. Most existing approaches focus on achieving a target recall, which does not consider whether an information need has been met. This paper introduces two heuristic stopping methods that instead monitor whether screened documents contain enough information to make a decision. Evaluation on a standard dataset of Diagnostic Test Accuracy Systematic Reviews demonstrates that the proposed approaches substantially reduce the number of documents that need to be examined while, in the majority of cases, maintaining conclusions that are consistent with all evidence available.

Identification of appropriate supporting evidence is critical to the success of scientific fact checking. However, existing approaches rely on off-the-shelf Information Retrieval algorithms that rank documents based on relevance rather than the evidence they provide to support or refute the claim being checked. This paper proposes +VeriRel which includes verification success in the document ranking. Experimental results on three scientific fact checking datasets (SciFact, SciFact-Open and Check-Covid) demonstrate consistently leading performance by +VeriRel for document evidence retrieval and a positive impact on downstream verification. This study highlights the potential of integrating verification feedback to document relevance assessment for effective scientific fact checking systems. It shows promising future work to evaluate fine-grained relevance when examining complex documents for advanced scientific fact checking.

This paper presents a Technology Assisted Review (TAR) stopping approach based on Reinforcement Learning (RL). Previous such approaches offered limited control over stopping behaviour, such as fixing the target recall and tradeoff between preferring to maximise recall or cost. These limitations are overcome by introducing a novel RL environment, GRLStop, that allows a single model to be applied to multiple target recalls, balances the recall/cost tradeoff and integrates a classifier. Experiments were carried out on six benchmark datasets (CLEF e-Health datasets 2017-9, TREC Total Recall, TREC Legal and Reuters RCV1) at multiple target recall levels. Results showed that the proposed approach to be effective compared to multiple baselines in addition to offering greater flexibility.

We present RLStop, a novel Technology Assisted Review (TAR) stopping rule based on reinforcement learning that helps minimise the number of documents that need to be manually reviewed within TAR applications. RLStop is trained on example rankings using a reward function to identify the optimal point to stop examining documents. Experiments at a range of target recall levels on multiple benchmark datasets (CLEF e-Health, TREC Total Recall, and Reuters RCV1) demonstrated that RLStop substantially reduces the workload required to screen a document collection for relevance. RLStop outperforms a wide range of alternative approaches, achieving performance close to the maximum possible for the task under some circumstances.

Technology-assisted Review (TAR), which aims to reduce the effort required to screen collections of documents for relevance, is used to develop systematic reviews of medical evidence and identify documents that must be disclosed in response to legal proceedings. Stopping methods are algorithms that determine when to stop screening documents during the TAR process, helping to ensure that workload is minimised while still achieving a high level of recall. This article proposes a novel stopping method based on point processes, which are statistical models that can be used to represent the occurrence of random events. The approach uses rate functions to model the occurrence of relevant documents in the ranking and compares four candidates, including one that has not previously been used for this purpose (hyperbolic). Evaluation is carried out using standard datasets (CLEF e-Health, TREC Total Recall, TREC Legal), and this work is the first to explore stopping method robustness by reporting performance on a range of rankings of varying effectiveness. Results show that the proposed method achieves the desired level of recall without requiring an excessive number of documents to be examined in the majority of cases and also compares well against multiple alternative approaches.

Technology Assisted Review (TAR) aims to minimise the manual judgements required to identify relevant documents. Reductions in workload are dependent on a reviewer being able to make an informed decision about when to stop examining documents. Counting processes offer a theoretically sound approach to creating stopping criteria for TAR approaches that are based on analysis of the rate at which relevant documents are observed. This paper introduces two modifications to existing approaches: application of a Cox Process (a counting process which has not previously been used for this problem) and use of a rate function based on a power law. Experiments on the CLEF 2017 e-Health TAR collection demonstrates that these approaches produces results that are superior to those reported previously.

Over a decade, as a specialized workshop in the field of text mining applied to biomedical informatics, DTMBIO (ACM international workshop on Data and Text Mining in Biomedical Informatics) has been held annually in conjunction with one of the largest data management conferences, CIKM. The purpose of DTMBIO is to foster discussions regarding the state-of-the-art applications of data and text mining on biomedical research problems. To address our purpose, we bring together researchers working on computer science and bio/medical informatics area including text mining and high throughput genomic data analysis, such as the next generation Sequencing (NGS) data. DTMBIO 2020 will help scientists navigate emerging trends and opportunities in the evolving area of informatics related techniques and problems in the context of biomedical research.

Topic modelling is a popular unsupervised method for identifying the underlying themes in document collections that has many applications in information retrieval. A topic is usually represented by a list of terms ranked by their probability but, since these can be difficult to interpret, various approaches have been developed to assign descriptive labels to topics. Previous work on the automatic assignment of labels to topics has relied on a two-stage approach: (1) candidate labels are retrieved from a large pool (e.g. Wikipedia article titles); and then (2) re-ranked based on their semantic similarity to the topic terms. However, these extractive approaches can only assign candidate labels from a restricted set that may not include any suitable ones. This paper proposes using a sequence-to-sequence neural-based approach to generate labels that does not suffer from this limitation. The model is trained over a new large synthetic dataset created using distant supervision. The method is evaluated by comparing the labels it generates to ones rated by humans.

Systematic reviews identify, summarise and synthesise evidence relevant to specific research questions. They are widely used in the field of medicine where they inform health care choices of both professionals and patients. It is important for systematic reviews to stay up to date as evidence changes but this is challenging in a field such as medicine where a large number of publications appear on a daily basis. Developing methods to support the updating of reviews is important to reduce the workload required and thereby ensure that reviews remain up to date. This paper describes a dataset of systematic review updates in the field of medicine created using 25 Cochrane reviews. Each review includes the Boolean query and relevance judgements for both the original and updated versions. The dataset can be used to evaluate approaches to study identification for review updates.

Topic models have been shown to be a useful way of representing the content of large document collections, for example, via visualization interfaces (topic browsers). These systems enable users to explore collections by way of latent topics. A standard way to represent a topic is using a term list; that is the top‐n words with highest conditional probability within the topic. Other topic representations such as textual and image labels also have been proposed. However, there has been no comparison of these alternative representations. In this article, we compare 3 different topic representations in a document retrieval task. Participants were asked to retrieve relevant documents based on predefined queries within a fixed time limit, presenting topics in one of the following modalities: (a) lists of terms, (b) textual phrase labels, and (c) image labels. Results show that textual labels are easier for users to interpret than are term lists and image labels. Moreover, the precision of retrieved documents for textual and image labels is comparable to the precision achieved by representing topics using term lists, demonstrating that labeling methods are an effective alternative topic representation.

We introduce a new problem, identifying the type of relation that holds between a pair of similar items in a digital library. Being able to provide a reason why items are similar has applications in recommendation, personalization, and search. We investigate the problem within the context of Europeana, a large digital library containing items related to cultural heritage. A range of types of similarity in this collection were identified. A set of 1,500 pairs of items from the collection were annotated using crowdsourcing. A high intertagger agreement (average 71.5 Pearson correlation) was obtained and demonstrates that the task is well defined. We also present several approaches to automatically identifying the type of similarity. The best system applies linear regression and achieves a mean Pearson correlation of 71.3, close to human performance. The problem formulation and data set described here were used in a public evaluation exercise, the *SEM shared task on Semantic Textual Similarity. The task attracted the participation of 6 teams, who submitted 14 system runs. All annotations, evaluation scripts, and system runs are freely available.

The main objective of the workshop is to bring together researchers who are interested in applications of topic models and improving their output. Our goal is to create a broad platform for researchers to share ideas that could improve the usability and interpretation of topic models. We expect this will promote topic model applications in other research areas, making their use more effective.

Current Information Retrieval systems for digital cultural heritage support only the actual search aspect of the information seeking process. This demonstration presents the second PATHS system which provides the exploration, analysis, and sense-making features to support the full information seeking process.