Table Retrieval (TR) has traditionally been formulated as an ad-hoc retrieval problem, where relevance is primarily determined by topical semantic similarity. With the growing adoption of LLM-based agentic systems, access to structured data is increasingly instruction-driven, where relevance is conditional on explicit content and schema constraints rather than topical similarity alone. We therefore formalize Instruction-Following Table Retrieval (IFTR), a new task that requires models to jointly satisfy topical relevance and fine-grained instruction constraints. We identify two core challenges in IFTR: (i) sensitivity to content scope, such as inclusion and exclusion constraints, and (ii) awareness of schema-grounded requirements, including column semantics and representation granularity--capabilities largely absent in existing retrievers. To support systematic evaluation, we introduce FollowTable, the first large-scale benchmark for IFTR, constructed via a taxonomy-driven annotation pipeline. We further propose a new metric, termed the Instruction Responsiveness Score, to evaluate whether retrieval rankings consistently adapt to user instructions relative to a topic-only baseline. Our results indicate that existing retrieval models struggle to follow fine-grained instructions over tabular data. In particular, they exhibit systematic biases toward surface-level semantic cues and remain limited in handling schema-grounded constraints, highlighting substantial room for future improvements.

Deep Research systems have revolutionized how LLMs solve complex questions through iterative reasoning and evidence gathering. However, current systems remain fundamentally constrained to textual web data, overlooking the vast knowledge embedded in multimodal documents: scientific papers, technical reports, and financial documents where critical information exists in figures, tables, charts, and equations. Processing such documents demands sophisticated parsing to preserve visual semantics, intelligent chunking to maintain structural coherence, and adaptive retrieval across modalities, which are capabilities absent in existing systems. In response, we present Doc-Researcher, a unified system that bridges this gap through three integrated components: (i) deep multimodal parsing that preserves layout structure and visual semantics while creating multi-granular representations from chunk to document level, (ii) systematic retrieval architecture supporting text-only, vision-only, and hybrid paradigms with dynamic granularity selection, and (iii) iterative multi-agent workflows that decompose complex queries, progressively accumulate evidence, and synthesize comprehensive answers across documents and modalities. To enable rigorous evaluation, we introduce M4DocBench, the first benchmark for Multi-modal, Multi-hop, Multi-document, and Multi-turn deep research. Featuring 158 expert-annotated questions with complete evidence chains across 304 documents, M4DocBench tests capabilities that existing benchmarks cannot assess. Experiments demonstrate that Doc-Researcher achieves 50.6% accuracy, 3.4× better than state-of-the-art baselines, validating that effective document research requires not just better retrieval, but fundamentally deep parsing that preserve multimodal integrity and support iterative research. Our work establishes a new paradigm for conducting deep research on multimodal document collections.

In multi-stakeholder recommender systems (RS), users and providers operate as two crucial and interdependent roles, whose interests must be well-balanced. Prior research has demonstrated the importance of guaranteeing both provider fairness and user accuracy to meet their interests. However, when balancing the two objectives, another critical factor emerges: individual fairness, which manifests as a significant disparity in individual recommendation accuracy, with some users receiving high accuracy while others are left with notably low accuracy. This oversight severely harms the interests of users and exacerbates social polarization. How to guarantee individual fairness while ensuring user accuracy and provider fairness remains an unsolved problem. To bridge this gap, this article proposes a method called BankFair+, which extends BankFair with two steps: (1) introducing a non-linear function from regret theory to ensure individual fairness while enhancing user accuracy; (2) formulating the re-ranking process as a regret-aware fuzzy programming problem to meet the interests of both individual users and providers, therefore balancing the tradeoff between individual fairness and provider fairness. Experiments on two real-world recommendation datasets demonstrate that BankFair+ outperforms all baselines regarding individual fairness, user accuracy, and provider fairness, indicating its ability to guarantee two-sided fairness and accuracy in RS.

Recommender systems are essential for information access, allowing users to present their content for recommendation. With the rise of large language models (LLMs), AI-generated content (AIGC), primarily in the form of text, has become a central part of the content ecosystem. As AIGC becomes increasingly prevalent, it is important to understand how it affects the performance and dynamics of recommender systems. To this end, we construct an environment that incorporates AIGC to explore its short-term impact. The results from popular sequential recommendation models reveal that AIGC are ranked higher in the recommender system, reflecting the phenomenon of source. To further explore the long-term impact of AIGC, we introduce a feedback loop with realistic simulators. The results show that the model's preference for AIGC increases as the user clicks on AIGC rises and the model trains on simulated click data. This leads to two issues: In the short term, bias toward AIGC encourages LLM-based content creation, increasing AIGC content, and causing unfair traffic distribution. From a long-term perspective, our experiments also show that when AIGC dominates the content ecosystem after a feedback loop, it can lead to a decline in recommendation performance. To address these issues, we propose a debiasing method based on L1-loss optimization to maintain long-term content ecosystem balance. In a real-world environment with AIGC generated by mainstream LLMs, our method ensures a balance between AIGC and human-generated content in the ecosystem. The code and dataset are available at https://github.com/Yuqi-Zhou/Rec_SourceBias.

Recent studies have revealed a phenomenon known as source bias, where PLM-based retrievers assign higher relevance scores to LLM-generated content despite its semantic quality being comparable to human-written content. As LLMs rapidly advance and become more widely used, effectively counteracting source bias is crucial for the sustainable development of the information retrieval (IR) ecosystem. Existing methods primarily attempt to address source bias from the retriever side, adopting a "passive defense" approach that intervenes only after biased content has entered the retrieval pipeline. These solutions are limited by frequent retriever updates in industrial applications, high recurring costs, and their inability to address the root cause of source bias.

Maintaining the long-term sustainability of recommender systems (RS) is crucial.Traditional RS evaluation methods primarily focus on the user's immediate feedback (e.g., click), however, they often overlook the long-term effect involved by the content creators.In the real world, content creators can strategically create and upload new items to the platform by analyzing users' feedback and preference trends.Although previous studies have attempted to model creator behaviors, they often overlook that such behaviors are under conditions of information asymmetry.This asymmetry arises because creators mainly access the user feedback on the items they produce, while the platform has access to the full spectrum of feedback data.However, existing RS simulators often fail to consider such a condition, making the long-term RS evaluation inaccurate.To bridge this gap, we propose a Large Language Model (LLM)empowered creator simulation agent named CreAgent.By utilizing the belief mechanism from game theory and the fast-and-slow thinking framework, we can simulate the creator's behaviors well under information asymmetry.Furthermore, to enhance CreAgent's simulation ability, we utilize Proximal Policy Optimization to fine-tune CreAgent.Our credibility validation experiments demonstrate that our simulation environment effectively aligns with the behaviors of real-world platforms and creators, thereby enhancing the reliability of long-term evaluations in RS.Furthermore, leveraging this simulator, we can examine whether RS algorithms, such as fairnessand diversity-aware methods, contribute to improving long-term performance for different stakeholders.

Out of sustainable and economical considerations, two-sided recommendation platforms must satisfy the needs of both users and providers. Previous studies often show that the two sides' needs show different urgency: providers need a relatively long-term exposure demand while users want more short-term and accurate service. However, our empirical study reveals that previous methods for trading off fairness-accuracy often fail to guarantee long-term fairness and short-term accuracy simultaneously in real applications of fluctuating user traffic. Especially, when user traffic is low, the user experience often drops a lot. Our theoretical analysis also confirms that user traffic is a key factor in such a trade-off problem. How to guarantee accuracy and fairness under fluctuating user traffic remains a problem. Inspired by the bankruptcy problem in economics, we propose a novel fairness-aware re-ranking approach named BankFair. Intuitively, BankFair employs the Talmud rule to leverage periods of abundant user traffic to offset periods of user traffic scarcity, ensuring consistent user service at every period while upholding long-term fairness. Specifically, BankFair consists of two modules: (1) employing the Talmud rule to determine the required fairness degree under varying periods of user traffic; and (2) conducting an online re-ranking algorithm based on the fairness degree determined by the Talmud rule. Experiments on two real-world recommendation datasets show that BankFair outperforms all baselines regarding accuracy and provider fairness.

Recently, the emergence of large language models (LLMs) has revolutionized the paradigm of information retrieval (IR) applications, especially in web search, by generating vast amounts of human-like texts on the Internet. As a result, IR systems in the LLM era are facing a new challenge: the indexed documents are now not only written by human beings but also automatically generated by the LLMs. How these LLM-generated documents influence the IR systems is a pressing and still unexplored question. In this work, we conduct a quantitative evaluation of IR models in scenarios where both human-written and LLM-generated texts are involved. Surprisingly, our findings indicate that neural retrieval models tend to rank LLM-generated documents higher. We refer to this category of biases in neural retrievers towards the LLM-generated content as the source bias. Moreover, we discover that this bias is not confined to the first-stage neural retrievers, but extends to the second-stage neural re-rankers. Then, in-depth analyses from the perspective of text compression indicate that LLM-generated texts exhibit more focused semantics with less noise, making it easier for neural retrieval models to semantic match. To mitigate the source bias, we also propose a plug-and-play debiased constraint for the optimization objective, and experimental results show its effectiveness. Finally, we discuss the potential severe concerns stemming from the observed source bias and hope our findings can serve as a critical wake-up call to the IR community and beyond. To facilitate future explorations of IR in the LLM era, the constructed two new benchmarks are available at https://github.com/KID-22/Source-Bias.

In this paper, we address the issue of recommending fairly from the aspect of providers, which has become increasingly essential in multistakeholder recommender systems. Existing studies on provider fairness usually focused on designing proportion fairness (PF) metrics that first consider systematic fairness. However, sociological researches show that to make the market more stable, max-min fairness (MMF) is a better metric. The main reason is that MMF aims to improve the utility of the worst ones preferentially, guiding the system to support the providers in weak market positions. When applying MMF to recommender systems, how to balance user preferences and provider fairness in an online recommendation scenario is still a challenging problem. In this paper, we proposed an online re-ranking model named Provider Max-min Fairness Re-ranking (P-MMF) to tackle the problem. Specifically, P-MMF formulates provider fair recommendation as a resource allocation problem, where the exposure slots are considered the resources to be allocated to providers and the max-min fairness is used as the regularizer during the process. We show that the problem can be further represented as a regularized online optimizing problem and solved efficiently in its dual space. During the online re-ranking phase, a momentum gradient descent method is designed to conduct the dynamic re-ranking. Theoretical analysis showed that the regret of P-MMF can be bounded. Experimental results on four public recommender datasets demonstrated that P-MMF can outperformed the state-of-the-art baselines. Experimental results also show that P-MMF can retain small computationally costs on a corpus with the large number of items.

Interactive recommendation has drawn widespread attention from both academia and industry due to its effectiveness in real-world mobile applications. Instead of receiving message passively, customers can exploit further with less effort through generated queries. Usually, such systems mainly contain two main components: query generation and item recommendation. In this paper, we propose a novel framework that models both queries and items in shared latent embedding space via a dual sequence transformer structure, which captures customer's potential interest from the prospect of reconciling the historical queries and corresponding customers interactions. We propose a click-through-rate model to generate query candidates, and a session search model for further more precise information. Comprehensive offline and online experiments are conducted, and the results demonstrate that our proposed dual-sequence-transformer based model can better utilize interaction and improve the accuracy of recommendations.