We present GERN, a novel scalable framework for training GNNs in node classification tasks, based on effective resistance, a standard tool in spectral graph theory. Our method progressively refines the GNN weights on a sequence of random spanning trees suitably transformed into path graphs which, despite their simplicity, are shown to retain essential topological and node information of the original input graph. The sparse nature of these path graphs substantially lightens the computational burden of GNN training. This not only enhances scalability but also improves accuracy in subsequent test phases, especially under small training set regimes, which are of great practical importance, as in many real-world scenarios labels may be hard to obtain. In these settings, our framework yields very good results as it effectively counters the training deterioration caused by overfitting when the training set is small. Our method also addresses common issues like over-squashing and over-smoothing while avoiding under-reaching phenomena.

As deep learning systems become pervasive, the demand for trustworthy and transparent AI continues to grow. Traditional feature attribution methods, however, often lack robustness and alignment with human reasoning. This tutorial moves beyond feature attribution by introducing participants to two complementary interpretability paradigms: Concept-Based Explainable AI (C-XAI) and Mechanistic Interpretability. C-XAI provides explanations grounded in high-level, human-interpretable concepts, bridging the gap between model reasoning and human understanding. In parallel, mechanistic interpretability--a quickly emerging field--focuses on reverse-engineering neural networks to uncover and disentangle the internal mechanisms that give rise to human-understandable representations. Through interactive coding sessions and hands-on exercises, attendees will gain practical experience implementing, evaluating, and comparing a variety of C-XAI and mechanistic interpretability techniques. By the end of the tutorial, participants will be equipped with a modern interpretability toolbox and a deeper understanding of how to apply them in real-world scenarios.

Graph representation learning methods, such as node embeddings, are powerful approaches to map nodes into a latent vector space, allowing their use for various graph learning tasks. Despite their success, these techniques are inherently black-boxes and few studies have focused on investigating local explanations of node embeddings for specific instances. Moreover, explaining the overall behavior of unsupervised embedding models remains an unexplored problem, limiting global interpretability and debugging potentials. We address this gap by developing human-understandable explanations for latent space dimensions in node embeddings. Towards that, we first develop new metrics that measure the global interpretability of embeddings based on the marginal contribution of the latent dimensions to predicting graph structure. We say an embedding dimension is more interpretable if it can faithfully map to an understandable sub-structure in the input graph - like community structure. Having observed that standard node embeddings have low interpretability, we then introduceDine(Dimension-based Interpretable Node Embedding). This novel approach can retrofit existing node embeddings by making them more interpretable without sacrificing their task performance. We conduct extensive experiments on synthetic and real-world graphs and show that we can simultaneously learn highly interpretable node embeddings with effective performance in link prediction and node classification.

Social media has been an important tool in the expansion of the populist message, and it is thought to have contributed to the electoral success of populist parties in the past decade. This study compares how populist parties advertised on Facebook during the 2019 European Parliamentary election. In particular, we examine commonalities and differences in which audiences they reach and on which issues they focus. By using data from Meta (previously Facebook) Ad Library, we analyze 45k ad campaigns by 39 parties, both populist and mainstream, in Germany, United Kingdom, Italy, Spain, and Poland. While populist parties represent just over 20% of the total expenditure on political ads, they account for 40% of the total impressions—most of which from Eurosceptic and far-right parties—thus hinting at a competitive advantage for populist parties on Facebook. We further find that ads posted by populist parties are more likely to reach male audiences, and sometimes much older ones. In terms of issues, populist politicians focus on monetary policy, state bureaucracy and reforms, and security, while the focus on EU and Brexit is on par with non-populist, mainstream parties. However, issue preferences are largely country-specific, thus supporting the view in political science that populism is a “thin ideology”, that does not have a universal, coherent policy agenda. This study illustrates the usefulness of publicly available advertising data for monitoring the populist outreach to, and engagement with, millions of potential voters, while outlining the limitations of currently available data.

Studying information propagation in social media is an important task with plenty of applications for business and science. Generating realistic synthetic information cascades can help the research community in developing new methods and applications, testing sociological hypotheses and different what-if scenarios by simply changing few parameters. We demonstrate womg, a synthetic data generator which combines topic modeling and a topic-aware propagation model to create realistic information-rich cascades, whose shape depends on many factors, including the topic of the item and its virality, the homophily of the social network, the interests of its users and their social influence.

The pervasive application of algorithmic decision-making is raising concerns on the risk of unintended bias in AI systems deployed in critical settings such as healthcare. The detection and mitigation of model bias is a very delicate task that should be tackled with care and involving domain experts in the loop. In this paper we introduce FairLens, a methodology for discovering and explaining biases. We show how this tool can audit a fictional commercial black-box model acting as a clinical decision support system (DSS). In this scenario, the healthcare facility experts can use FairLens on their historical data to discover the biases of the model before incorporating it into the clinical decision flow. FairLens first stratifies the available patient data according to demographic attributes such as age, ethnicity, gender and healthcare insurance; it then assesses the model performance on such groups highlighting the most common misclassifications. Finally, FairLens allows the expert to examine one misclassification of interest by explaining which elements of the affected patients’ clinical history drive the model error in the problematic group. We validate FairLens’ ability to highlight bias in multilabel clinical DSSs introducing a multilabel-appropriate metric of disparity and proving its efficacy against other standard metrics.

In the last decade drug overdose deaths reached staggering proportions in the US. Besides the raw yearly deaths count that is worrisome per se, an alarming picture comes from the steep acceleration of such rate that increased by 21% from 2015 to 2016. While traditional public health surveillance suffers from its own biases and limitations, digital epidemiology offers a new lens to extract signals from Web and Social Media that might be complementary to official statistics. In this paper we present a computational approach to identify a digital cohort that might provide an updated and complementary view on the opioid crisis. We introduce an information retrieval algorithm suitable to identify relevant subspaces of discussion on social media, for mining data from users showing explicit interest in discussions about opioid consumption in Reddit. Moreover, despite the pseudonymous nature of the user base, almost 1.5 million users were geolocated at the US state level, resembling the census population distribution with a good agreement. A measure of prevalence of interest in opiate consumption has been estimated at the state level, producing a novel indicator with information that is not entirely encoded in the standard surveillance. Finally, we further provide a domain specific vocabulary containing informal lexicon and street nomenclature extracted by user-generated content that can be used by researchers and practitioners to implement novel digital public health surveillance methodologies for supporting policy makers in fighting the opioid epidemic.

We focus on collaborative filtering dealing with self-organizing communities, host mobility, wireless access, and ad-hoc communications. In such a domain, knowledge representation and users profiling can be hard; remote servers can be often unreachable due to client mobility; and feedback ratings collected during random connections to other users' ad-hoc devices can be useless, because of natural differences between human beings. Our approach is based on so called Affinity Networks, and on a novel system, called MobHinter, that epidemically spreads recommendations through spontaneous similarities between users. Main results of our study are two fold: firstly, we show how to reach comparable recommendation accuracies in the mobile domain as well as in a complete knowledge scenario; secondly, we propose epidemic collaborative strategies that can reduce rapidly and realistically the cold start problem.