EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Saurabh Kumar 0007
dblp:89/11294-7
· DBLP profile ↗
5ranked-venue papers in the field
2as first author
5since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0001-5909-5567ORCID · conflict
Domains — venue-derived; a paper can count in several
Other / Interdisciplinary · 3 (1 first)Information Retrieval & Web Search · 2 (1 first)
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | SCRUBD: Smart Contracts Reentrancy and Unhandled Exceptions Vulnerability DatasetabstractSmart Contracts (SCs) handle transactions in the Ethereum blockchain worth millions of United States dollars, making them a lucrative target for attackers seeking to exploit vulnerabilities and steal funds. The Ethereum community has developed a rich set of tools to detect vulnerabilities in SCs, including reentrancy (RE) and unhandled exceptions (UX). A dataset of SCs labeled with vulnerabilities is needed to evaluate the tools’ efficacy. Existing SC datasets with labeled vulnerabilities have limitations, such as covering only a limited range of vulnerability scenarios and containing incorrect labels. As a result, there is a lack of a standardized dataset to compare the performances of these tools. Our dataset, SCRUBD, aims to fill this gap. SCRUBD is a dataset of real-world SCs and synthesized SCs labeled with RE and UX vulnerabilities. The real-world SC dataset is labeled through crowdsourcing, followed by manual inspection by an experienced SC programmer, and covers both RE and UX vulnerabilities. On the other hand, the synthesized dataset is carefully crafted to cover various RE scenarios only. Using SCRUBD, we compared the performance of six popular vulnerability detection tools. Based on our study, we found that Slither outperforms other tools on a crowdsourced dataset in detecting RE vulnerabilities, while Sailfish outperforms other tools on a manually synthesized dataset for detecting RE. For UX vulnerabilities, Slither outperforms all other tools. Chavhan Sujeet Yashavant, MitrajSinh Chavda, Saurabh Kumar 0007, Amey Karkare, Angshuman Karmakar |
MSR | 3 |
| 2025 | Reinforcement-Learning Based Covert Social Influence OperationsabstractHow might reinforcement-learning based covert social influence operations (CSIOs) be run, given that the CSIO agent wants to maximize influence and minimize discoverability of malicious accounts? And how successful can they be, given that both social platform bot detectors and humans might report them to the social platform? To answer these questions, we propose RL_CSIO, a methodology based on reinforcement learning (RL) for running CSIOs. We ran 4 CSIOs with IRB-approval over a period of 5 days using a panel of 225 human subjects. We explore 8 research questions based on the data collected. The results show that RL_CSIO agents successfully trade off influence and discoverability - but in ways that are nuanced and unexpected. Saurabh Kumar 0007, Valerio La Gatta, Andrea Pugliese 0001, Andrew Pulver, V. S. Subrahmanian, Jiazhi Zhang, Youzhi Zhang 0001 |
WWW | 1 |
| 2024 | Climbing the Influence Tiers on TikTok: A Multimodal StudyabstractCorporate social media analysts break influencers into five tiers of increasing importance: Nano, Micro, Mid, Macro, and Mega. We perform a comprehensive study of TikTok influencers with two goals: (i) what factors distinguish influencers in each of these tiers from the adjacent tier(s)? (ii) of the features influencers can directly control ("actionable" features), which ones are most impactful to reach the next tier? We build and release a novel TikTok dataset featuring over 230K videos from 5000 influencers - 1000 from each tier. The dataset includes video details such as likes, facial action units, emotions, and music information derived from Spotify. Access to the videos is facilitated through provided URLs and hydration code. To find the most important features that distinguish influencers in a tier from those in the next tier up, we thoroughly analyze traditional features (e.g., profile information) and text, audio, and video features using statistical methods and ablation testing. Our classifiers achieve F1-scores over 80%. The most impactful actionable features are traditional and video features, including enhancing video pleasure, quality, and emphasizing facial expressions. Finally, we collect and release a YouTube Shorts dataset to conduct a comparative analysis, aiming to identify similarities and differences between the two platforms. Pier Paolo Tricomi, Saurabh Kumar 0007, Mauro Conti, V. S. Subrahmanian |
ICWSM | 2 |
| 2022 | SniP: An Efficient Stack Tracing Framework for Multi-threaded ProgramsabstractUsage of the execution stack at run-time captures the dynamic state of programs and can be used to derive useful insights into the program behaviour. The stack usage information can be used to identify and debug performance and security aspects of applications. Binary run-time instrumentation techniques are well known to capture the memory access traces during program execution. Tracing the program in entirety and filtering out stack specific accesses is a commonly used technique for stack related analysis. However, applying vanilla tracing techniques (using tools like Intel Pin) for multi-threaded programs has challenges such as identifying the stack areas to perform efficient run-time tracing. K. P. Arun 0002, Saurabh Kumar 0007, Debadatta Mishra, Biswabandan Panda |
MSR | 2 |
| 2022 | AndroOBFS: Time-tagged Obfuscated Android Malware Dataset with Family InformationabstractWith the large-scale adaptation of Android OS and ever-increasing contributions in the Android application space, Android has become the number one target of malware writers. In recent years, a large number of automatic malware detection and classification systems have evolved to tackle the dynamic nature of malware growth using either static or dynamic analysis techniques. Performance of static malware detection methods degrade due to the obfuscation attacks. Although many benchmark datasets are available to measure the performance of malware detection and classification systems, only a single obfuscated malware dataset (PRAGuard) is available to showcase the efficacy of the existing malware detection systems against the obfuscation attacks. PRAGuard contains outdated samples till March 2013 and does not represent the latest application categories. Moreover, PRAGuard does not provide the family information for malware because of which PRAGuard can not be used to evaluate the efficacy of the malware family classification systems. Saurabh Kumar 0007, Debadatta Mishra, Biswabandan Panda, Sandeep K. Shukla |
MSR | 1 |