With the increasing development of human-AI teaming structures within and across geographies, the time is ripe for a continuous and objective look at the predictors, barriers, and facilitators of human-AI scientific collaboration from a multidisciplinary point of view. This paper aims at contributing to this end by exploiting a set of factors affecting attitudes towards the adoption of human-AI interaction into scientific work settings. In particular, we are interested in identifying the determinants of trust and acceptability when considering the combination of hybrid human-AI approaches for improving research practices. This includes the way as researchers assume human-centered artificial intelligence (AI) and crowdsourcing as valid mechanisms for aiding their tasks. Through the lens of a unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT) combined with an extended technology acceptance model (TAM), we pursue insights on the perceived usefulness, potential blockers, and adoption drivers that may be representative of the intention to use hybrid intelligence systems as a way of unveiling unknown patterns from large amounts of data and thus enabling novel scientific discoveries.

With cutting edge scientific breakthroughs, human-centred algorithmic approaches have proliferated in recent years and information technology (IT) has begun to redesign socio-technical systems in the context of human-AI collaboration. As a result, distinct forms of interaction have emerged in tandem with the proliferation of infrastructures aiding interdisciplinary work practices and research teams. Concomitantly, large volumes of heterogeneous datasets are produced and consumed at a rapid pace across many scientific domains. This results in difficulties in the reliable analysis of scientific production since current tools and algorithms are not necessarily able to provide acceptable levels of accuracy when analyzing the content and impact of publication records from large continuous scientific data streams. On the other hand, humans cannot consider all the information available and may be adversely influenced by extraneous factors. Using this rationale, we propose an initial design of a human-AI enabled pipeline for performing scientometric analyses that exploits the intersection between human behavior and machine intelligence. The contribution is a model for incorporating central principles of human-machine symbiosis (HMS) into scientometric workflows, demonstrating how hybrid intelligence systems can drive and encapsulate the future of research evaluation.