Aaron D. Lanterman

dblp:99/6473 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers in the field
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0002-4618-7988ORCID · corroborated

Domains — venue-derived; a paper can count in several

Other / Interdisciplinary · 4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 A Bias Mitigation Methodology for Multiple Hypothesis Tracking in Multi-Sensor Multi-Target Fusion
abstract
Track fusion between sensors at separate locations depends on the ability to estimate sensor biases to produce a single integrated picture. Approximating the nonlinear nature of the coordinate system with linear offsets is insufficient for tracking across the full volume of the sensors. In this research, a method to compute biases in sensor coordinates is expanded from the intial two dimensional approach to three dimensions. In addition, tracks are associated and fused together in a Track-Oriented Multiple Hypothesis Tracker, leveraging an Adaptive Semi-Greedy Search algorithm to effectively observe the track pattern across each sensor to compute these biases. The best hypothesis is reported as the current state, with high quality hypotheses kept from frame to frame at depth$N$. The performance of the bias estimation is assessed against the root mean squared error (RMSE) and normalized estimation error squard (NEES) for both the biases as well as the produced system tracks. A complex scenario with closely-spaced objects and maneuvering targets was selected to provide robust testing of the existing algorithm, demonstrating that it is effective beyond the initial simple scenario it was evaluated against.
Shaun J. Hoyt, William Dale Blair, Aaron D. Lanterman
FUSION3
2024 Non-Linear Bias Mitigation in Multi-Sensor Multi-Track Fusion
abstract
When performing track correlation and fusion in conjunction with bias estimation for sensor registration, the pattern match bias estimation is usually performed by modeling the biases as additive constants to the tracks in Cartesian space. Since sensor biases actually occur in sensor polar or spherical coordinates, the bias model of adding constants to the tracks can only be applied to a group of somewhat closely-spaced tracks before the linear assumption of the biases in Cartesian coordinates breaks down. A methodology to estimate sensor biases in the native coordinate frame in which they occur is presented, along with simulation results that illustrate its performance. Modeling the biases in sensor coordinates allow for tracks throughout the field of view to be used for sensor bias estimation, producing better sensor registration and track picture. In this research, sensor tracks are transmitted to a fusion center, where track correlation, bias estimation, and fusion are performed. Murty’s K-best hypotheses algorithm is utilized to generated the top K hypotheses for track-to-track correlation. Each hypothesis produces an estimate of the sensor biases. The correlation hypotheses are corrected for their sensor bias estimates and new correlation scores are computed, and the biascorrected correlation hypotheses are ranked to find the best. The best hypothesis is selected as the most recent system track picture. The system tracks produced by the best hypothesis are correlated against the previous system track picture to maintain system track number continuity. The performance of the bias estimation is assessed against the root mean squared error (RMSE) and normalized estimation error squared (NEES) errors of the estimated biases versus the true biases. A scenario with four tracks and two sensors is used to demonstrate the observability of these biases. The results show that the biases as applied to the remote sensor are observable and mitigated, allowing for a more accurate track picture.
Shaun J. Hoyt, William Dale Blair, Aaron D. Lanterman
FUSION3
2009 Comparison of Raman spectra estimation algorithms
Mahendra Mallick, Barry L. Drake, Haesun Park, Andy Register, William Dale Blair, Phil West, Ryan D. Palkki, Aaron D. Lanterman, Darren Emge
FUSION8
2009 Algorithms and performance bounds for chemical identification under a Poisson model for Raman spectroscopy
Ryan D. Palkki, Aaron D. Lanterman
FUSION2