Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Mayuree Srikulwong

dblp:00/195 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
3as first author
0since 2021 · last 2013
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 3 · 3 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Haptics and multimodal interaction · 91% Interaction techniques and input · 9%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Haptics and multimodal interaction
tactile display
0.112011
A comparative study of tactile representation techniques for landmarks on a wearable device · CHI 2011
Haptics and multimodal interaction › haptic navigation
tactile navigation
0.112011
A comparative study of tactile representation techniques for landmarks on a wearable device · CHI 2011
Haptics and multimodal interaction › tactile display
wearable tactile display
0.112011
A comparative study of tactile representation techniques for landmarks on a wearable device · CHI 2011
Interaction techniques and input › spatial interaction
navigation
0.012011
A comparative study of tactile representation techniques for landmarks on a wearable device · CHI 2011

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

comparative study · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2013 Wearable tactile display of directions for pedestrian navigation: Comparative lab and field evaluations
abstract
We aim to contribute to the development of tactile-based pedestrian navigation systems that help users to navigate urban environments with minimal attention to the user-device interface. This paper describes the design and evaluation of a prototype and reports findings from (i) a lab-based study that directly compared features of two widely researched forms of tactile display: a waist belt and a back array; and (ii) a field evaluation which compared our prototype tactile-based navigation system (TactNav) with a visual mobile maps application (Nokia Maps™). Lab results indicated that the waist belt afforded significantly better performance than the back array across a wide range of metrics. Field results indicated that users' performance with the tactile-based system was equivalent to that with the visual-based system in terms of accuracy while route completion time was significantly faster with the tactile-based directional display.
Mayuree Srikulwong, Eamonn O'Neill
World Haptics1
2011 A comparative study of tactile representation techniques for landmarks on a wearable device
abstract
Wearable tactile navigation displays may provide an alternative or complement to mobile visual navigation displays. Landmark information may provide a useful complement to directional information for navigation, however, there has been no reported use of landmark information in tactile navigation displays. We report a study that compared two tactile display techniques for landmark representation using one or two actuators respectively. The single-actuator technique generated different vibration patterns on a single actuator to represent different landmarks. The dual-actuator technique generated a single vibration pattern using two simultaneous actuators and different pairs of actuators around the body represented different landmarks. We compared the two techniques on four measures: distinguishability, learnability, short term memorability and user preference. Results showed that users performed equally well when either technique was used to represent landmarks alone. However, when landmark representations were presented together with directional signals, performance with the single-actuator technique was significantly reduced while performance with the dual-actuator technique remained unchanged.
Mayuree Srikulwong, Eamonn O'Neill
CHI1
2007 Multimodal Interaction in a Ubiquitous Environment
Mayuree Srikulwong
INTERACT (2)1