Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Muralidhara Subbarao

dblp:00/3822 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
11ranked-venue papers
8as first author
0since 2021 · last 1998
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 8 · 6 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 5 · 4 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
6 papers
3D vision · 90% Segmentation and scene understanding · 5% Video understanding and tracking · 5%
Computer graphics and multimedia
4 papers
Image and video processing · 57% Computational photography and imaging · 43%
Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Performance modeling and evaluation · 100%

Topics — the 12 heaviest of 15, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computer vision › 3D vision
depth estimation
0.031998
Selecting the Optimal Focus Measure for Autofocusing and Depth-From-Focus · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 1998
Accurate Recovery of Three-Dimensional Shape from Image Focus · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 1995
Depth recovery from blurred edges · CVPR 1988
Computer vision › 3D vision › depth estimation › focus-based depth estimation
depth from focus
0.021998
Selecting the Optimal Focus Measure for Autofocusing and Depth-From-Focus · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 1998
Accurate Recovery of Three-Dimensional Shape from Image Focus · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 1995
Computational photography and imaging › image acquisition › imaging system design › camera design
autofocus
0.011998
Selecting the Optimal Focus Measure for Autofocusing and Depth-From-Focus · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 1998
Image and video processing
image reconstruction
0.011995
Accurate Recovery of Three-Dimensional Shape from Image Focus · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 1995
Computer vision › 3D vision › motion estimation
optical flow
0.021989
Interpretation of Image Flow: A Spatio-Temporal Approach · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 1989
Closed-form solutions to image flow equations for 3D structure and motion · Int. J. Comput. Vis. 1988
Image and video processing
motion analysis
0.021988
Interpretation of image flow: Rigid curved surfaces in motion · Int. J. Comput. Vis. 1988
Bounds on Translational and Angular Velocity Components from First Order Derivatives of Image Flow · AAAI 1987
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding
scene understanding
0.011989
Interpretation of Image Flow: A Spatio-Temporal Approach · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 1989
Computer vision › Video understanding and tracking
spatio-temporal analysis
0.011989
Interpretation of Image Flow: A Spatio-Temporal Approach · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 1989
Computer vision › 3D vision › depth estimation › focus-based depth estimation
depth from defocus
0.011988
Depth recovery from blurred edges · CVPR 1988
Computer vision › 3D vision › structure from motion
structure and motion estimation
0.011988
Closed-form solutions to image flow equations for 3D structure and motion · Int. J. Comput. Vis. 1988
Image and video processing › motion estimation
optical flow
0.011987
Bounds on Translational and Angular Velocity Components from First Order Derivatives of Image Flow · AAAI 1987
Computer vision › 3D vision
3d shape reconstruction
0.011995
Accurate Recovery of Three-Dimensional Shape from Image Focus · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 1995

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

noise sensitivity analysis · 0.1autofocusing uncertainty measure · 0.1ARMS error · 0.1paraxial-geometric optics · 0.0focus measure maximization · 0.0computational methods for image flow · 0.0analytic formulation · 0.0edge blur analysis · 0.0closed-form solution · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1998 Selecting the Optimal Focus Measure for Autofocusing and Depth-From-Focus
abstract
A method is described for selecting the optimal focus measure with respect to gray-level noise from a given set of focus measures in passive autofocusing and depth-from-focus applications. The method is based on two new metrics that have been defined for estimating the noise-sensitivity of different focus measures. The first metric-the autofocusing uncertainty measure (AUM)-is useful in understanding the relation between gray-level noise and the resulting error in lens position for autofocusing. The second metric-autofocusing root-mean-square error (ARMS error)-is an improved metric closely related to AUM. AUM and ARMS error metrics are based on a theoretical noise sensitivity analysis of focus measures, and they are related by a monotonic expression. The theoretical results are validated by actual and simulation experiments. For a given camera, the optimally accurate focus measure may change from one object to the other depending on their focused images. Therefore, selecting the optimal focus measure from a given set involves computing all focus measures in the set.
Muralidhara Subbarao, Jenn-Kwei Tyan
IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell.1
1995 Accurate Recovery of Three-Dimensional Shape from Image Focus
abstract
A new shape-from-focus method is described which is based on a new concept, named focused image surface (FIS). FIS of an object is defined as the surface formed by the set of points at which the object points are focused by a camera lens. According to paraxial-geometric optics, there is a one-to-one correspondence between the shape of an object and the shape of its FIS. Therefore, the problem of shape recovery can be posed as the problem of determining the shape of the FIS. From the shape of FIS the shape of the object is easily obtained. In this paper the shape of the FIS is determined by searching for a shape which maximizes a focus measure. In contrast to previous literature where the focus measure is computed over the planar image detector of the camera, here the focus measure is computed over the FIS. This results in more accurate shape recovery than the traditional methods. Also, using FIS, a more accurate focused image can be reconstructed from a sequence of images than is possible with traditional methods. The new method has been implemented on an actual camera system, and the results of shape recovery and focused image reconstruction are presented.>
Muralidhara Subbarao, Tae Choi
IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell.1
1990 Bounds on time-to-collision and rotational component from first-order derivatives of image flow
Muralidhara Subbarao
Comput. Vis. Graph. Image Process.1
1989 Interpretation of Image Flow: A Spatio-Temporal Approach
abstract
A general formulation is described for the interpretation of image flow. In the framework of this formulation, computational methods have been derived for image flow interpretation for many important cases, including simple cases of nonrigid and nonuniform motions. It is possible to derive computational methods for other situations not considered explicitly. The formulation is general in that it is applicable to any situation provided that the scene geometry, the scene transformation, and the image flow are all 'smooth' or analytic.>
Muralidhara Subbarao
IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell.1
1988 Depth recovery from blurred edges
abstract
A method is proposed for recovering depth from a measure of the degree of blur of an edge. Closed-form solution is derived for an edge which is a step discontinuity of intensity in the focused image. The method is simpler and more general than two earlier methods proposed by A.P. Pentland (1987) and P. Grossman (1987). It has been verified experimentally and found to provide useful depth information.>
Muralidhara Subbarao, Natarajan Gurumoorthy
CVPR1
1988 Interpretation of image flow: Rigid curved surfaces in motion
Muralidhara Subbarao
Int. J. Comput. Vis.1
1988 Closed-form solutions to image flow equations for 3D structure and motion
Allen M. Waxman, Behrooz Kamgar-Parsi, Muralidhara Subbarao
Int. J. Comput. Vis.3
1987 Bounds on Translational and Angular Velocity Components from First Order Derivatives of Image Flow
Muralidhara Subbarao
AAAI1
1987 A new class of edge-preserving smoothing filters
David Harwood, Muralidhara Subbarao, Hannu Hakalahti, Larry Davis 0001
Pattern Recognit. Lett.2
1986 Closed from solutions to image flow equations for planar surfaces in motion
Muralidhara Subbarao, Allen M. Waxman
Comput. Vis. Graph. Image Process.1
1985 Texture classification by local rank correlation
David Harwood, Muralidhara Subbarao, Larry Davis 0001
Comput. Vis. Graph. Image Process.2