Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Nathan White

dblp:00/7706 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
0as first author
4since 2021 · last 2026
0009-0006-1919-0782ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Theory of computation · 4 · 4 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
4 papers
Computational complexity · 32% Algorithms and data structures · 25% Mathematical optimization · 17%
Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Parallel and multicore computing · 100%

Topics — the 14 heaviest of 14, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computational complexity
property testing
1.012026
Testing Noisy Low-Degree Polynomials for Sparsity · STOC 2026
Computational complexity › property testing › graph property testing
sparsity testing
1.012026
Testing Noisy Low-Degree Polynomials for Sparsity · STOC 2026
Computational complexity › property testing
tolerant testing
1.012026
Testing Noisy Low-Degree Polynomials for Sparsity · STOC 2026
Algorithms and data structures › similarity search › nearest neighbor search
approximate nearest neighbor search
0.912025
Average Distortion Sketching · FOCS 2025
Approximation and online algorithms
approximation schemes
0.912025
Stochastic Knapsack without Relaxing the Capacity · FOCS 2025
Algorithms and data structures
metric embedding
0.912025
Average Distortion Sketching · FOCS 2025
Algorithms and data structures › similarity search
nearest neighbor search
0.912025
Average Distortion Sketching · FOCS 2025
Approximation and online algorithms › approximation schemes
polynomial-time approximation scheme
0.912025
Stochastic Knapsack without Relaxing the Capacity · FOCS 2025
Mathematical optimization › knapsack problem
stochastic knapsack
0.912025
Stochastic Knapsack without Relaxing the Capacity · FOCS 2025
Mathematical optimization
stochastic optimization
0.912025
Stochastic Knapsack without Relaxing the Capacity · FOCS 2025
Parallel and multicore computing
parallel graph algorithms
0.812024
Parallel Approximate Maximum Flows in Near-Linear Work and Polylogarithmic Depth · SODA 2024
Graph algorithms and graph theory › graph algorithms › network flow
maximum flow
0.812024
Parallel Approximate Maximum Flows in Near-Linear Work and Polylogarithmic Depth · SODA 2024
Computational complexity › space complexity
space lower bounds
0.312025
Average Distortion Sketching · FOCS 2025
Graph algorithms and graph theory › graph algorithms › network flow › maximum flow
approximate maximum flow
0.212024
Parallel Approximate Maximum Flows in Near-Linear Work and Polylogarithmic Depth · SODA 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

approximate maximum flow · 1.5PRAM model · 1.5property testing · 1.0metric embedding · 0.9locality-sensitive hashing · 0.9anti-concentration · 0.9PTAS · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 Testing Noisy Low-Degree Polynomials for Sparsity
abstract
We consider the problem of testing if an unknown low-degree polynomial p over ℝn is sparse versus far from sparse, given access to noisy evaluations of the polynomial p at randomly chosen points. This is a natural property-testing version of various well-studied problems about learning low-degree sparse polynomials in the presence of noise, and is a generalization of the work of Chen, De, and Servedio (2020), on testing noisy linear functions for sparsity, to the more challenging setting of low-degree polynomials.
Yiqiao Bao, Anindya De, Shivam Nadimpalli, Rocco A. Servedio, Nathan White
STOC5
2025 Average Distortion Sketching
abstract
We introduce average-distortion sketching for metric spaces. As in (worst-case) sketching, these algorithms compress points in a metric space while approximately recovering pairwise distances. The novelty is studying average-distortion: for any fixed (yet, arbitrary) distribution $\mu$ over the metric, the sketch should not over-estimate distances, and it should (approximately) preserve the average distance with respect to draws from $\mu$. The notion generalizes average-distortion embeddings into $\ell_{1}$ [1], [2] as well as data-dependent locality-sensitive hashing [3], [4], which have been recently studied in the context of nearest neighbor search.•For all $p \in(2, \infty)$ and any c larger than a fixed constant, we give an average-distortion sketch for ($[\Delta]^{d}, \ell_{p}$) with approximation c and bit-complexity poly $\left(2^{p / c} \cdot \log (d \Delta)\right)$, which is provably impossible in (worst-case) sketching.•As an application, we improve on the approximation of sublinear-time data structures for nearest neighbor search over $\ell_{p}$ (for large $p\gt2$). The prior best approximation was $O(p)$ [2], [4], and we show it can be any c larger than a fixed constant (irrespective of p) by using $n^{O(p / c)}$ space.We give some evidence that $2^{\Omega(p / c)}$ space may be necessary by giving a lower bound on average-distortion sketches which produce a certain probabilistic certificate of farness (which our sketches crucially rely on).
Yiqiao Bao, Anubhav Baweja, Nicolas Menand, Erik Waingarten, Nathan White, Tian Zhang 0009
FOCS5
2025 Stochastic Knapsack without Relaxing the Capacity
abstract
We present the first polynomial-time approximation scheme (PTAS) for the stochastic knapsack problem that does not relax the knapsack’s capacity. Given n items with known arbitrary independent size distributions and fixed profits, an accuracy parameter $\varepsilon \in(0,1)$, and an overflow probability bound $\alpha$, our algorithm computes a set of items with profit at least $(1-\varepsilon)$ times optimal, while ensuring the probability of exceeding the capacity is at most $4 \sqrt{\alpha}+\varepsilon$. Prior to our work, no PTAS was known without either allowing a ($1+\varepsilon$) capacity expansion or restricting to special distribution classes (such as Poisson or Gaussian). A key tool in our algorithm is an anti-concentration result that allows us to handle “low-profit” items by adapting a known PTAS result for the case when we are allowed to expand knapsack capacity by a ($1+\varepsilon$) factor. We then show that we are able to convert this solution into another solution with a similar profit which strictly obeys the knapsack capacity, but requires that we relax the overflow probability to a $4 \sqrt{\alpha}+\varepsilon$ factor. In the special case where the item sizes are scaled Bernoulli random variables (which have support on 0 and exactly one other value), we extend our approach to obtain an improved overflow probability guarantee of $\alpha+\varepsilon$. We make this improvement by exploiting the fact that these random variables are defined by only two parameters (the probability of being non-zero and the non-zero value in the support), which allows us to avoid some of the complexity and overhead of our algorithm for arbitrary distributions.
Anindya De, Sanjeev Khanna, Nathan White
FOCS3
2024 Parallel Approximate Maximum Flows in Near-Linear Work and Polylogarithmic Depth
abstract
We present a parallel algorithm for the (1 — ɛ) -approximate maximum flow problem in capacitated, undirected graphs with n vertices and m edges, achieving O(ɛ-3 polylog n) depth and O(mɛ-3 polylog n) work in the PRAM model. Although near-linear time sequential algorithms for this problem have been known for almost a decade, no parallel algorithms that simultaneously achieved polylogarithmic depth and near-linear work were known.
Arpit Agarwal 0001, Sanjeev Khanna, Huan Li 0002, Prathamesh Patil, Chen Wang 0027, Nathan White, Peilin Zhong
SODA6