Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Alissa Centivany

dblp:01/10874 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2016
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 2 · 2 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
2 papers
Collaborative and social computing · 100%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Collaborative and social computing › online communities
community governance
0.212016
"Popcorn Tastes Good": Participatory Policymaking and Reddit's · CHI 2016
Collaborative and social computing
online communities
0.212016
"Popcorn Tastes Good": Participatory Policymaking and Reddit's · CHI 2016
Collaborative and social computing
social media
0.212016
"Popcorn Tastes Good": Participatory Policymaking and Reddit's · CHI 2016
Collaborative and social computing
socio-technical systems
0.212016
Policy as Embedded Generativity: A Case Study of the Emergence and Evolution of HathiTrust · CSCW 2016
Collaborative and social computing › social computing
platform governance
0.112016
"Popcorn Tastes Good": Participatory Policymaking and Reddit's · CHI 2016
Collaborative and social computing
social computing
0.112016
"Popcorn Tastes Good": Participatory Policymaking and Reddit's · CHI 2016

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

qualitative case study · 0.2exit-voice-loyalty framework · 0.2case study · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2016 "Popcorn Tastes Good": Participatory Policymaking and Reddit's
abstract
In human-computer interaction research and practice, policy concerns can sometimes fall to the margins, orbiting at the periphery of the traditionally core interests of design and practice. This perspective ignores the important ways that policy is bound up with the technical and behavioral elements of the HCI universe. Policy concerns are triggered as a matter of course in social computing, CSCW, systems engineering, UX, and related contexts because technological design, social practice and policy are dynamically entangled and mutually constitutive. Through this research, we demonstrate the value of a stronger emphasis on policy in HCI by exploring a recent controversy on Reddit: "AMAgeddon." Applying Hirschman's exit, voice and loyalty framework, we argue that the sustainability of online communities like Reddit will require successful navigation of the complex and often murky intersections among technical design and human interaction through a distributed participatory policymaking process that promotes user loyalty.
Alissa Centivany, Bobby Glushko
CHI1
2016 Policy as Embedded Generativity: A Case Study of the Emergence and Evolution of HathiTrust
abstract
The traditional core of CSCW focuses on the relationships, tensions, and gaps between technical systems and social activity. Policy orbits around this core as a persistent but marginally represented presence. In the last few years, however, CSCW has witnessed an upsurge of interest in (re)integrating policy more explicitly and meaningfully into research and practice. For example, recent scholarship stressed the mutually constitutive and interconnected threads of design, practice, and policy [31]. This paper expands upon those motivations through a qualitative case study of the role of policy in library mass digitization work and the subsequent emergence and evolution of the HathiTrust cooperative partnership. By tracing the origins and impacts of early policy decisions in this context, this research contributes to understandings of how and why policy can both close and open spaces of social practice and technical design, functioning as a source of embedded generativity in complex sociotechnical systems.
Alissa Centivany
CSCW1