Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Stavros V. Tzurbakis

dblp:01/1978 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2003
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
3D vision · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computer vision › 3D vision
feature matching
0.012003
Feature Transfer and Matching in Disparate Stereo Views through the Use of Plane Homographies · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2003
Computer vision › 3D vision › multi-view geometry › two-view geometry
homography
0.012003
Feature Transfer and Matching in Disparate Stereo Views through the Use of Plane Homographies · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2003
Computer vision › 3D vision
multi-view geometry
0.012003
Feature Transfer and Matching in Disparate Stereo Views through the Use of Plane Homographies · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2003
Computer vision › 3D vision
stereo vision
0.012003
Feature Transfer and Matching in Disparate Stereo Views through the Use of Plane Homographies · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2003

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

geometric constraint transfer · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2003 Feature Transfer and Matching in Disparate Stereo Views through the Use of Plane Homographies
abstract
Many vision tasks rely upon the identification of sets of corresponding features among different images. This paper presents a method that, given some corresponding features in two stereo images, matches them with features extracted from a second stereo pair captured from a distant viewpoint. The proposed method is based on the assumption that the viewed scene contains two planar surfaces and exploits geometric constraints that are imposed by the existence of these planes to first transfer and then match image features between the two stereo pairs. The resulting scheme handles point and line features in a unified manner and is capable of successfully matching features extracted from stereo pairs that are acquired from considerably different viewpoints. Experimental results are presented, which demonstrate that the performance of the proposed method compares favorably to that of epipolar and tensor-based approaches.
Manolis I. A. Lourakis, Stavros V. Tzurbakis, Antonis A. Argyros, Stelios C. Orphanoudakis
IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell.2
2000 Using Geometric Constraints for Matching Disparate Stereo Views of 3D Scenes Containing Planes
abstract
Several vision tasks rely upon the availability of sets of corresponding features among images. This paper presents a method which, given some corresponding features in two stereo images, addresses the problem of matching them with features extracted from a second stereo pair captured from a distant viewpoint. The proposed method is based on the assumption that the viewed scene contains two planar surfaces and exploits geometric constraints that are imposed by the existence of these planes to predict the location of image features in the second stereo pair. The resulting scheme handles point and line features in a unified manner and is capable of successfully matching features extracted from stereo pairs acquired from considerably different viewpoints. Experimental results from a prototype implementation demonstrate the effectiveness of the approach.
Manolis I. A. Lourakis, Stavros V. Tzurbakis, Antonis A. Argyros, Stelios C. Orphanoudakis
ICPR2