Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Andrew S. Fast
dblp:01/5004
· DBLP profile ↗
6ranked-venue papers
4as first author
0since 2021 · last 2010
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 4 first-authorDatabases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 5 · 3 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
3 papers |
Knowledge representation and reasoning · 27% Graph learning · 26% Trustworthy machine learning · 26% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
3 papers |
Data mining · 68% Data integration and cleaning · 26% Web and social media mining · 6% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers |
Computational finance and economics · 74% Computational social science and digital humanities · 26% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Automated reasoning and model checking · 100% | |
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
Distributed systems · 100% |
Topics — the 11 heaviest of 14, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Graph learning › graph neural network › node classification
collective classification |
0.1 | 1 | 2008 | Why Stacked Models Perform Effective Collective Classification · ICDM 2008 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability |
0.1 | 1 | 2008 | Why Stacked Models Perform Effective Collective Classification · ICDM 2008 |
Data mining › causal inference › causal modeling
causal discovery |
0.1 | 1 | 2008 | Automatic identification of quasi-experimental designs for discovering causal knowledge · KDD 2008 |
Automated reasoning and model checking
theorem proving |
0.1 | 1 | 2008 | Automatic identification of quasi-experimental designs for discovering causal knowledge · KDD 2008 |
Computational finance and economics
fraud detection |
0.1 | 1 | 2007 | Relational data pre-processing techniques for improved securities fraud detection · KDD 2007 |
Data integration and cleaning
data preprocessing |
0.1 | 1 | 2007 | Relational data pre-processing techniques for improved securities fraud detection · KDD 2007 |
Data mining
clustering |
0.1 | 1 | 2005 | Creating social networks to improve peer-to-peer networking · KDD 2005 |
Data mining › clustering › model-based clustering
latent variable clustering |
0.1 | 1 | 2005 | Creating social networks to improve peer-to-peer networking · KDD 2005 |
Distributed systems
peer-to-peer systems |
0.1 | 1 | 2005 | Creating social networks to improve peer-to-peer networking · KDD 2005 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
statistical relational learning |
0.0 | 1 | 2007 | Relational data pre-processing techniques for improved securities fraud detection · KDD 2007 |
Web and social media mining
social network analysis |
0.0 | 1 | 2005 | Creating social networks to improve peer-to-peer networking · KDD 2005 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
theorem proving · 0.2first-order logic · 0.2aggregate variable construction · 0.2statistical relational learning · 0.2normalization · 0.2link formation · 0.2latent-variable clustering · 0.1hierarchical dirichlet process · 0.1stacking · 0.1joint inference · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 | The Application of Statistical Relational Learning to a Database of Criminal and Terrorist ActivityabstractWe apply statistical relational learning to a database of criminal and terrorist activity to predict attributes and event outcomes. The database stems from a collection of news articles and court records which are carefully annotated with a variety of variables, including categorical and continuous fields. Manual analysis of this data can help inform decision makers seeking to curb violent activity within a region. We use this data to build relational models from historical data to predict attributes of groups, individuals, or events. Our first example involves predicting social network roles within a group under a variety of different data conditions. Collective classification can be used to boost the accuracy under data poor conditions. Additionally, we were able to predict the outcome of hostage negotiations using models trained on previous kidnapping events. The overall framework and techniques described here are flexible enough to be used to predict a variety of variables. Such predictions could be used as input to a more complex system to recognize intent of terrorist groups or as input to inform human decision makers. Brian Delaney, Andrew S. Fast, William M. Campbell, Clifford J. Weinstein, David D. Jensen |
SDM | 2 |
| 2008 | Why Stacked Models Perform Effective Collective ClassificationabstractCollective classification techniques jointly infer all class labels of a relational data set, using the inferences about one class label to influence inferences about related class labels. Kou and Cohen recently introduced an efficient relational model based on stacking that, despite its simplicity, has equivalent accuracy to more sophisticated joint inference approaches. Using experiments on both real and synthetic data, we show that the primary cause for the performance of the stacked model is the reduction in bias from learning the stacked model on inferred labels rather than true labels. The reduction in variance due to conditional inference also contributes to the effect but it is not as strong. In addition, we show that the performance of the joint inference and stacked learners can be attributed to an implicit weighting of local and relational features at learning time. Andrew S. Fast, David D. Jensen |
ICDM | 1 |
| 2008 | Automatic identification of quasi-experimental designs for discovering causal knowledgeabstractResearchers in the social and behavioral sciences routinely rely on quasi-experimental designs to discover knowledge from large data-bases. Quasi-experimental designs (QEDs) exploit fortuitous circumstances in non-experimental data to identify situations (sometimes called "natural experiments") that provide the equivalent of experimental control and randomization. QEDs allow researchers in domains as diverse as sociology, medicine, and marketing to draw reliable inferences about causal dependencies from non-experimental data. Unfortunately, identifying and exploiting QEDs has remained a painstaking manual activity, requiring researchers to scour available databases and apply substantial knowledge of statistics. However, recent advances in the expressiveness of databases, and increases in their size and complexity, provide the necessary conditions to automatically identify QEDs. In this paper, we describe the first system to discover knowledge by applying quasi-experimental designs that were identified automatically. We demonstrate that QEDs can be identified in a traditional database schema and that such identification requires only a small number of extensions to that schema, knowledge about quasi-experimental design encoded in first-order logic, and a theorem-proving engine. We describe several key innovations necessary to enable this system, including methods for automatically constructing appropriate experimental units and for creating aggregate variables on those units. We show that applying the resulting designs can identify important causal dependencies in real domains, and we provide examples from academic publishing, movie making and marketing, and peer-production systems. Finally, we discuss the integration of QEDs with other approaches to causal discovery, including joint modeling and directed experimentation. David D. Jensen, Andrew S. Fast, Brian J. Taylor, Marc E. Maier |
KDD | 2 |
| 2007 | Relational data pre-processing techniques for improved securities fraud detectionabstractCommercial datasets are often large, relational, and dynamic. They contain many records of people, places, things, events and their interactions over time. Such datasets are rarely structured appropriately for knowledge discovery, and they often contain variables whose meanings change across different subsets of the data. We describe how these challenges were addressed in a collaborative analysis project undertaken by the University of Massachusetts Amherst and the National Association of Securities Dealers(NASD). We describe several methods for data pre-processing that we applied to transform a large, dynamic, and relational dataset describing nearly the entirety of the U.S. securities industry, and we show how these methods made the dataset suitable for learning statistical relational models. To better utilize social structure, we first applied known consolidation and link formation techniques to associate individuals with branch office locations. In addition, we developed an innovative technique to infer professional associations by exploiting dynamic employment histories. Finally, we applied normalization techniques to create a suitable class label that adjusts for spatial, temporal, and other heterogeneity within the data. We show how these pre-processing techniques combine to provide the necessary foundation for learning high-performing statistical models of fraudulent activity. Andrew S. Fast, Lisa Friedland, Marc E. Maier, Brian J. Taylor, David D. Jensen, Henry G. Goldberg, John Komoroske |
KDD | 1 |
| 2006 | Learning Models of Macrobehavior in Complex Adaptive Systems
Andrew S. Fast |
AAAI | 1 |
| 2005 | Creating social networks to improve peer-to-peer networkingabstractWe use knowledge discovery techniques to guide the creation of efficient overlay networks for peer-to-peer file sharing. An overlay network specifies the logical connections among peers in a network and is distinct from the physical connections of the network. It determines the order in which peers will be queried when a user is searching for a specific file. To better understand the role of the network overlay structure in the performance of peer-to-peer file sharing protocols, we compare several methods for creating overlay networks. We analyze the networks using data from a campus network for peer-to-peer file sharing that recorded anonymized data on 6,528 users sharing 291,925 music files over an 81-day period. We propose a novel protocol for overlay creation based on a model of user preference identified by latent-variable clustering with hierarchical Dirichlet processes (HDPs). Our simulations and empirical studies show that the clusters of songs created by HDPs effectively model user behavior and can be used to create desirable network overlays that outperform alternative approaches. Andrew S. Fast, David D. Jensen, Brian Neil Levine |
KDD | 1 |