Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Werner Kobitzsch
dblp:01/5007
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2001
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Empirical software engineering · 56% Requirements engineering and software design · 44% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Empirical software engineering › software engineering research methodology
industrial case study |
0.0 | 1 | 2001 | An industrial case study of implementing software risk management · ESEC / SIGSOFT FSE 2001 |
Requirements engineering and software design
risk management |
0.0 | 1 | 2001 | An industrial case study of implementing software risk management · ESEC / SIGSOFT FSE 2001 |
Empirical software engineering
software project management |
0.0 | 1 | 2001 | An industrial case study of implementing software risk management · ESEC / SIGSOFT FSE 2001 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
riskit method · 0.0case study · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2001 | An industrial case study of implementing software risk managementabstractExplicit risk management is gaining ground in industrial software development projects. However, there are few empirical studies that investigate the transfer of explicit risk management into industry, the adequacy of the risk management approaches to the constraints of industrial contexts, or their cost-benefit. This paper presents results from a case study that introduced a systematic risk management method, namely the Riskit method, into a large German telecommunication company. The objective of the case study was (1) to analyze the usefulness and adequacy of the Riskit method and (2) to analyze the cost-benefit of the Riskit method in this industrial context. The results of (1) also aimed at improvement and customization of the Riskit method. Moreover, we compare our findings with results of previous case studies to obtain more generalized conclusions on the Riskit method. Our results showed that the Riskit method is practical, adds value to the project, and that its key concepts are understood and usable in practice. Additionally, many lessons learned are reported that are useful for the general audience who wants to transfer risk management into new projects. Bernd G. Freimut, Susanne Hartkopf, Jyrki Kontio, Werner Kobitzsch |
ESEC / SIGSOFT FSE | 5 |