Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

V. Venkateswar

dblp:01/6215 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
7ranked-venue papers
4as first author
0since 2021 · last 1995
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 4 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 3 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer graphics and multimedia
2 papers
Image and video processing · 100%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
3D vision · 100%

Topics — the 7 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Image and video processing
edge detection
0.021992
Extraction of Straight Lines in Aerial Images · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 1992
Edge Detection and Linear Feature Extraction Using a 2-D Random Field Model · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 1989
Computer vision › 3D vision › stereo vision
stereo matching
0.011995
Hierarchical stereo and motion correspondence using feature groupings · Int. J. Comput. Vis. 1995
Image and video processing › pattern detection › curve detection
line extraction
0.011992
Extraction of Straight Lines in Aerial Images · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 1992
Image and video processing
feature extraction
0.011989
Edge Detection and Linear Feature Extraction Using a 2-D Random Field Model · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 1989
Image and video processing › feature extraction
linear feature extraction
0.011989
Edge Detection and Linear Feature Extraction Using a 2-D Random Field Model · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 1989
Image and video processing › texture analysis
random field models
0.011989
Edge Detection and Linear Feature Extraction Using a 2-D Random Field Model · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 1989
Computer vision › 3D vision › motion estimation
motion correspondence
0.011995
Hierarchical stereo and motion correspondence using feature groupings · Int. J. Comput. Vis. 1995

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

feature grouping · 0.0line linking · 0.0edge labeling · 0.0recursive least squares · 0.02-d causal autoregressive model · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1995 Hierarchical stereo and motion correspondence using feature groupings
V. Venkateswar, Rama Chellappa
Int. J. Comput. Vis.1
1992 Extraction of Straight Lines in Aerial Images
abstract
A straight-line extractor that produces line descriptions from aerial images is described. The input to the line extractor is in the form of an edge image, where the contrast and direction of each edge pixel is specified. The system scans the edge image left to right and top to bottom and assigns a line label for each scanned edge pixel, thereby generating a label image. At the end of this process, each edge pixel has a line label associated with it, and edge pixels that belong to the same line will be assigned the same line label. In addition, with each line label, a record that stores the end points, the average contrast, and the pixel support of the line is generated. The label image is used as a spatial index to further link fragmented lines. The authors also describe techniques for eliminating many of the physically insignificant lines, given that the domain of interpretation is aerial images dominated by man-made objects.>
V. Venkateswar, Rama Chellappa
IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell.1
1991 Hierarchical stereo matching using feature groupings
abstract
A feature based stereo matching system is designed. A hierarchical grouping process that groups line segments into more complex structures that are easier to match is proposed. The hierarchy consists of lines, vertices, edges and surfaces. Matching starts at the highest level of the hierarchy (surfaces) and proceeds to the lowest (lines). Higher level features are easier to match, because they are fewer in number and more distinct in form. These matches then constrain the matches at lower levels. Perceptual and structural relations are used to group matches into islands of certainty. A truth maintenance system (TMS) is used to enforce grouping constraints and eliminates inconsistent match groupings.>
V. Venkateswar, Rama Chellappa
ICTAI1
1990 A framework for interpretation of aerial images
abstract
A general framework for building aerial image interpretation systems is proposed. Within this framework, scene knowledge, which is frequently hierarchical and structured in nature, is represented using frames. Domain problem-solving knowledge, which is typically heuristic in form, is declaratively specified through the use of production rules. The issue of efficient search is addressed by the use of an assumption-based truth maintenance system (ATMS). Within these guidelines, a system has been implemented with the goal of detecting a class of buildings in aerial images. The process of building detection is carried out in a hierarchical manner. Line segments are first grouped to form vertices, which are then grouped to form edges. Edges are composed into edge rings. Shadow analysis on closed rings is used to make roof hypotheses. All the elements in the hierarchy are represented by frames. A search scheme based on an ATMS is used to deal with the ambiguities in this hierarchical grouping process.>
V. Venkateswar, Rama Chellappa
ICPR (1)1
1989 Edge Detection and Linear Feature Extraction Using a 2-D Random Field Model
abstract
The edge-detection problem is posed as one of detecting step discontinuities in the observed correlated image, using directional derivatives estimated with a random field model. Specifically, the method consists of representing the pixels in a local window by a 2-D causal autoregressive (AR) model, whose parameters are adaptively estimated using a recursive least-squares algorithm. The directional derivatives are functions of parameter estimates. An edge is detected if the second derivative in the direction of the estimated maximum gradient is negatively sloped and the first directional derivative and a local estimate of variance satisfy some conditions. Because the ordered edge detector may not detect edges of all orientations well, the image scanned in four different directions, and the union of the four edge images is taken as the final output. The performance of the edge detector is illustrated using synthetic and real images. Comparisons to other edge detectors are given. A linear feature extractor that operates on the edges produced by the AR model is presented.>
V. Venkateswar, Rama Chellappa
IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell.2
1986 Edge detection using zero crossings of directional derivatives of a random field model
abstract
An edge detector using the first and second directional derivatives of a random field model is described. The method consists of representing the pixels in a window by a 2 - D causal autoregressive (AR) model, whose parameters are adaptively estimated using a Kalman filter. Due to the modelling assumption, the directional derivates are functions of AR parameter estimates. An edge is detected if the second derivate in the direction of the estimated gradient is negatively sloped, the first derivatives and a local estimate of sample variance are over some threshold values. We illustrate the performance of the edge detector using real image examples.
Rama Chellappa, V. Venkateswar
ICASSP3
1985 Processing of noisy speech using group delay functions
abstract
A new noniterative technique for all pole modelling of noisy speech is proposed. We exploit the additive and high resolution properties of a group delay function to identify the high signal to noise ratio (SNR) regions of the short time spectrum and to separate out these regions from the low SNR regions. A modified spectrum is derived from the group delay function in these regions. The new spectrum is used to derive the all pole model for the speech segment. The main advantage of this method is that it is not necessary to have prior knowledge of the noise or speech characteristics as in the other methods of processing noisy speech.
Joy A. Thomas, Bayya Yegnanarayana, Raghuram Karinthi, V. Venkateswar
ICASSP4