Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Kwangpo Lee

dblp:02/3128 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2001
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Embedded and real-time systems · 75% Memory systems · 25%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Memory systems
cache
0.012001
Bounding Cache-Related Preemption Delay for Real-Time Systems · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 2001
Embedded and real-time systems › real-time scheduling › worst-case analysis
cache-related preemption delay
0.012001
Bounding Cache-Related Preemption Delay for Real-Time Systems · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 2001
Embedded and real-time systems
real-time scheduling
0.012001
Bounding Cache-Related Preemption Delay for Real-Time Systems · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 2001
Embedded and real-time systems › real-time scheduling
schedulability analysis
0.012001
Bounding Cache-Related Preemption Delay for Real-Time Systems · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 2001

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

linear programming · 0.0fixed-priority scheduling · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2001 Bounding Cache-Related Preemption Delay for Real-Time Systems
abstract
Cache memory is used in almost all computer systems today to bridge the ever increasing speed gap between the processor and main memory. However, its use in multitasking computer systems introduces additional preemption delay due to the reloading of memory blocks that are replaced during preemption. This cache-related preemption delay poses a serious problem in realtime computing systems where predictability is of utmost importance. We propose an enhanced technique for analyzing and thus bounding the cache-related preemption delay in fixed-priority preemptive scheduling focusing on instruction caching. The proposed technique improves upon previous techniques in two important ways. First, the technique takes into account the relationship between a preempted task and the set of tasks that execute during the preemption when calculating the cache-related preemption delay. Second, the technique considers the phasing of tasks to eliminate many infeasible task interactions. These two features are expressed as constraints of a linear programming problem whose solution gives a guaranteed upper bound on the cache-related preemption delay. This paper also compares the proposed technique with previous techniques using randomly generated task sets. The results show that the improvement on the worst-case response time prediction by the proposed technique over previous techniques ranges between 5 percent and 18 percent depending on the cache refill time when the task set utilization is 0.6. The results also show that as the cache refill time increases, the improvement increases, which indicates that accurate prediction of cache-related preemption delay by the proposed technique becomes increasingly important if the current trend of widening speed gap between the processor and main memory continues.
Chang-Gun Lee, Kwangpo Lee, Joosun Hahn, Yang-Min Seo, Sang Lyul Min, Rhan Ha, Seongsoo Hong, Chang Yun Park, Minsuk Lee, Chong-Sang Kim
IEEE Trans. Software Eng.2