Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Stanislav Funiak

dblp:02/351 · also Stano Funiak · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
8ranked-venue papers
2as first author
2since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 1 first-authorComputer networks · 3 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
4 papers
Graph learning · 64% Learning paradigms · 28% Planning, search and constraint satisfaction · 5%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Web and social media mining · 50% Data mining · 50%
Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
3 papers
Distributed systems · 60% Emerging computing paradigms · 40%
Computer networks
3 papers
Wireless sensing and localization · 64% Internet of things and sensor networks · 36%

Topics — the 12 heaviest of 15, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Graph learning › graph neural network
node classification
0.522017
Joint Label Inference in Networks · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2017
Joint Inference of Multiple Label Types in Large Networks · ICML 2014
Machine learning › Learning paradigms › semi-supervised learning › graph-based semi-supervised learning
label propagation
0.312017
Joint Label Inference in Networks · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2017
Machine learning › Graph learning › graph neural network › node classification
collective classification
0.212014
Joint Inference of Multiple Label Types in Large Networks · ICML 2014
Data mining › semi-supervised learning
label propagation
0.212014
Joint Inference of Multiple Label Types in Large Networks · ICML 2014
Web and social media mining
social network analysis
0.212014
Joint Inference of Multiple Label Types in Large Networks · ICML 2014
Distributed systems › distributed machine learning
distributed inference
0.112006
Distributed Inference in Dynamical Systems · NIPS 2006
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction
heuristic search
0.112005
Combining Stochastic and Greedy Search in Hybrid Estimation · AAAI 2005
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping › state estimation › multiagent state estimation
multi-robot state estimation
0.012006
Distributed Inference in Dynamical Systems · NIPS 2006
Internet of things and sensor networks › wireless sensor network
sensor deployment
0.012006
Distributed Inference in Dynamical Systems · NIPS 2006
Distributed systems
distributed algorithms
0.012006
Distributed localization of networked cameras · IPSN 2006
Machine learning › Learning theory
statistical estimation
0.012005
Combining Stochastic and Greedy Search in Hybrid Estimation · AAAI 2005
Internet of things and sensor networks
wireless sensor network
0.012005
Claytronics: highly scalable communications, sensing, and actuation networks · SenSys 2005

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

distributed message passing · 0.8label propagation · 0.3belief state coordination · 0.2assumed density filtering · 0.2projective geometry · 0.1probabilistic reasoning · 0.1modular robotics algorithms · 0.1stochastic search · 0.1greedy search · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 DFedDG2: Distribution-Guided Gossip-Based Generalizable and Communication-Efficient Decentralized Federated Learning
abstract
Traditional Federated Learning (FL) focuses on collaborative global model training while ensuring privacy and personalization. Decentralized Federated Learning (DFL), a variant of FL, allows clients to independently manage and optimize local models without a central server. DFL reduces centralized communication bottlenecks and vulnerability to server failures or attacks. However, because the optimization dynamics change and there is no global model, generalization can suffer, making effective learning under data and model heterogeneity a critical challenge in DFL. Despite growing interest in DFL, the lack of distributional and uncertainty modeling in the literature limits reliability and effective generalization in non-IID settings. In this work, we propose DFedDG2, a personalized federated learning framework that operates within a peer-to-peer protocol. DFedDG2 offers the technical advantage of modeling each client’s local data distribution and exchanging this information with one-hop neighbors. In the decentralized network, clients perform distribution-aware gossip, where statistically similar clients exert greater influence to drive global alignment. This likelihood-weighted mixing fuses only a handful of vectors and scalars, significantly reducing communication costs while aligning semantic spaces across the network and enabling personalized training at the edge. In addition, theoretically, we prove that DFedDG2 achieves a sublinear convergence rate while the consensus error decays at a geometric rate under well-principled properties of gossip. Unlike the label-only non-IID experiments in DFL literature, we conduct extensive experiments on multiple data non-IID scenarios, topology variations, model heterogeneity, and uncertainty quantification, demonstrating the practical advantages of DFedDG2. Our results show that DFedDG2 not only achieves communication efficiency but also provides better generalization and improved reliability compared to state-of-the-art approaches.
Biprodip Pal, Stanislav Funiak, Jiajun Liu 0004, Peyman Moghadam, Md. Saiful Islam 0003, Alan Wee-Chung Liew
IEEE Internet Things J.2
2024 Towards Cost-Efficient Federated Multi-agent RL with Learnable Aggregation
Yi Zhang 0105, Sen Wang 0001, Zhi Chen 0010, Xuwei Xu, Stanislav Funiak, Jiajun Liu 0004
PAKDD (2)5
2017 Joint Label Inference in Networks
abstract
We consider the problem of inferring node labels in a partially labeled graph where each node in the graph has multiple label types and each label type has a large number of possible labels. Our primary example, and the focus of this paper, is the joint inference of label types such as hometown, current city, and employers for people connected by a social network; by predicting these user profile fields, the network can provide a better experience to its users. Existing approaches such as Label Propagation (Zhu et al., 2003) fail to consider interactions between the label types. Our proposed method, called EDGEEXPLAIN explicitly models these interactions, while still allowing scalable inference under a distributed message- passing architecture. On a large subset of the Facebook social network, collected in a previous study (Chakrabarti et al., 2014), EDGEEXPLAIN outperforms label propagation for several label types, with lifts of up to $120\%$ for recall@1 and $60\%$ for recall@3.
Deepayan Chakrabarti, Stanislav Funiak, Sofus A. Macskassy
J. Mach. Learn. Res.2
2014 Joint Inference of Multiple Label Types in Large Networks
abstract
We tackle the problem of inferring node labels in a partially labeled graph where each node in the graph has multiple label types and each label type has a large number of possible labels. Our primary example, and the focus of this paper, is the joint inference of label types such as hometown, current city, and employers, for users connected by a social network. Standard label propagation fails to consider the properties of the label types and the interactions between them. Our proposed method, called EdgeExplain, explicitly models these, while still enabling scalable inference under a distributed message-passing architecture. On a billion-node subset of the Facebook social network, EdgeExplain significantly outperforms label propagation for several label types, with lifts of up to 120% for recall@1 and 60% for recall@3.
Deepayan Chakrabarti, Stanislav Funiak, Sofus A. Macskassy
ICML2
2006 Distributed localization of networked cameras
abstract
Camera networks are perhaps the most common type of sensor network and are deployed in a variety of real-world applications including surveillance, intelligent environments and scientific remote monitoring. A key problem in deploying a network of cameras is calibration, i.e., determining the location and orientation of each sensor so that observations in an image can be mapped to locations in the real world. This paper proposes a fully distributed approach for camera network calibration. The cameras collaborate to track an object that moves through the environment and reason probabilistically about which camera poses are consistent with the observed images. This reasoning employs sophisticated techniques for handling the difficult nonlinearities imposed by projective transformations, as well as the dense correlations that arise between distant cameras. Our method requires minimal overlap of the cameras' fields of view and makes very few assumptions about the motion of the object. In contrast to existing approaches, which are centralized, our distributed algorithm scales easily to very large camera networks. We evaluate the system on a real camera network with 25 nodes as well as simulated camera networks of up to 50 cameras and demonstrate that our approach performs well even when communication is lossy.
Stanislav Funiak, Carlos Guestrin, Mark A. Paskin, Rahul Sukthankar
IPSN1
2006 Distributed Inference in Dynamical Systems
abstract
We present a robust distributed algorithm for approximate probabilistic inference in dynamical systems, such as sensor networks and teams of mobile robots. Using assumed density filtering, the network nodes maintain a tractable representation of the belief state in a distributed fashion. At each time step, the nodes coordinate to condition this distribution on the observations made throughout the network, and to advance this estimate to the next time step. In addition, we identify a significant challenge for probabilistic inference in dynamical systems: message losses or network partitions can cause nodes to have inconsistent beliefs about the current state of the system. We address this problem by developing distributed algorithms that guarantee that nodes will reach an informative consistent distribution when communication is re-established. We present a suite of experimental results on real-world sensor data for two real sensor network deployments: one with 25 cameras and another with 54 temperature sensors.
Stanislav Funiak, Carlos Guestrin, Mark A. Paskin, Rahul Sukthankar
NIPS1
2005 Combining Stochastic and Greedy Search in Hybrid Estimation
Lars Blackmore, Stanislav Funiak, Brian C. Williams
AAAI2
2005 Claytronics: highly scalable communications, sensing, and actuation networks
abstract
We propose a demonstration of extremely scalable modular robotics algorithms developed as part of the Claytronics Project (http://www-2.cs.cmu.edu/~claytronics/), as well as a demonstration of proof-of-concept prototypes. Our effort envisions multi-million-module robot ensembles able to morph into three-dimensional scenes, eventually with sufficient fidelity so as to convince a human observer the scenes are real. Although this work is potentially revolutionary in the sense that it holds out the possibility of radically altering the relationship between computation, humans, and the physical world, many of the research questions involved are similar in flavor to more mainstream systems research, albeit larger in scale. For instance, as in sensor networks, each robot will incorporate sensing, computation, and communications components. However, unlike most sensor networks each robot will also include mechanisms for actuation and motion. Many of the key challenges in this project involve coordination and communication of sensing and actuation across such large ensembles of independent units.
Burak Aksak, Preethi Srinivas Bhat, Jason Campbell, Michael DeRosa, Stanislav Funiak, Phillip B. Gibbons, Seth Copen Goldstein, Carlos Guestrin, Ashish Gupta 0003, Casey Helfrich, James F. Hoburg, Brian T. Kirby, James J. Kuffner, Peter Lee 0001, Todd C. Mowry, Padmanabhan Pillai, Ram Ravichandran, Benjamin D. Rister, Srinivasan Seshan, Metin Sitti
SenSys5