Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Alicia L. Carriquiry

dblp:02/6717 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2007
0000-0002-6428-9427ORCID · verified

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology › gene expression analysis
differential expression analysis
0.112007
Pooling mRNA in microarray experiments and its effect on power · Bioinform. 2007
Bioinformatics and computational biology
gene expression analysis
0.112007
Pooling mRNA in microarray experiments and its effect on power · Bioinform. 2007
Bioinformatics and computational biology › gene expression analysis
microarray data analysis
0.112007
Pooling mRNA in microarray experiments and its effect on power · Bioinform. 2007

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

weighted average model · 0.1f-statistic · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2007 Pooling mRNA in microarray experiments and its effect on power
abstract
MOTIVATION: Microarrays can simultaneously measure the expression levels of many genes and are widely applied to study complex biological problems at the genetic level. To contain costs, instead of obtaining a microarray on each individual, mRNA from several subjects can be first pooled and then measured with a single array. mRNA pooling is also necessary when there is not enough mRNA from each subject. Several studies have investigated the impact of pooling mRNA on inferences about gene expression, but have typically modeled the process of pooling as if it occurred in some transformed scale. This assumption is unrealistic. RESULTS: We propose modeling the gene expression levels in a pool as a weighted average of mRNA expression of all individuals in the pool on the original measurement scale, where the weights correspond to individual sample contributions to the pool. Based on these improved statistical models, we develop the appropriate F statistics to test for differentially expressed genes. We present formulae to calculate the power of various statistical tests under different strategies for pooling mRNA and compare resulting power estimates to those that would be obtained by following the approach proposed by Kendziorski et al. (2003). We find that the Kendziorski estimate tends to exceed true power and that the estimate we propose, while somewhat conservative, is less biased. We argue that it is possible to design a study that includes mRNA pooling at a significantly reduced cost but with little loss of information.
Wuyan Zhang, Alicia L. Carriquiry, Dan Nettleton, Jack C. M. Dekkers
Bioinform.2