Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Jiaxin Pan 0001

dblp:02/8828 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
40ranked-venue papers
16as first author
23since 2021 · last 2026
0000-0002-7459-6850ORCID · verified

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Security and privacy · 39 · 16 first-author · 23 since 2021Theory of computation · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Network and information security
29 papers
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis · 66% Cryptographic protocols and secure computation · 33% Authentication and access control · 1%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Logic in computer science · 50% Mathematical optimization · 50%

Topics — the 30 heaviest of 41, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis › public-key cryptography
digital signatures
4.9122024
Toothpicks: More Efficient Fork-Free Two-Round Multi-signatures · EUROCRYPT (1) 2024
Compact Structure-Preserving Signatures with Almost Tight Security · J. Cryptol. 2023
Chopsticks: Fork-Free Two-Round Multi-signatures from Non-interactive Assumptions · EUROCRYPT (5) 2023
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis › provable security
tight security
4.192026
Generic Constructions of Compact and Tightly Selective-Opening Secure Public-Key Encryption Schemes · J. Cryptol. 2026
A Generic Construction of Tightly Secure Password-Based Authenticated Key Exchange · ASIACRYPT (8) 2023
Signed (Group) Diffie-Hellman Key Exchange with Tight Security · J. Cryptol. 2022
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation › key exchange
authenticated key exchange
3.352025
sfXHMQV: Better Efficiency and Stronger Security for Signal's Initial Handshake based on HMQV · CRYPTO (8) 2025
Lattice-Based Authenticated Key Exchange with Tight Security · CRYPTO (5) 2023
A Generic Construction of Tightly Secure Password-Based Authenticated Key Exchange · ASIACRYPT (8) 2023
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis › public-key cryptography
public-key encryption
2.342026
Generic Constructions of Compact and Tightly Selective-Opening Secure Public-Key Encryption Schemes · J. Cryptol. 2026
Compact and Tightly Selective-Opening Secure Public-key Encryption Schemes · ASIACRYPT (3) 2022
Tightly Secure Hierarchical Identity-Based Encryption · J. Cryptol. 2020
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation
key exchange
2.232025
sfXHMQV: Better Efficiency and Stronger Security for Signal's Initial Handshake based on HMQV · CRYPTO (8) 2025
Key Exchange with Tight (Full) Forward Secrecy via Key Confirmation · EUROCRYPT (6) 2024
Signed (Group) Diffie-Hellman Key Exchange with Tight Security · J. Cryptol. 2022
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis › public-key cryptography › digital signatures › pairing-based signatures
structure-preserving signatures
1.952023
Compact Structure-Preserving Signatures with Almost Tight Security · J. Cryptol. 2023
Shorter QA-NIZK and SPS with Tighter Security · ASIACRYPT (3) 2019
More Efficient (Almost) Tightly Secure Structure-Preserving Signatures · EUROCRYPT (2) 2018
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation › proof systems
zero-knowledge proofs
1.742023
Non-Interactive Zero-Knowledge Proofs with Fine-Grained Security · EUROCRYPT (2) 2022
Unconditionally Secure NIZK in the Fine-Grained Setting · ASIACRYPT (2) 2022
Shorter QA-NIZK and SPS with Tighter Security · ASIACRYPT (3) 2019
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis › public-key cryptography › public-key encryption
selective opening security
1.622026
Generic Constructions of Compact and Tightly Selective-Opening Secure Public-Key Encryption Schemes · J. Cryptol. 2026
Compact and Tightly Selective-Opening Secure Public-key Encryption Schemes · ASIACRYPT (3) 2022
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis › public-key cryptography › digital signatures
multi-signature
1.422024
Toothpicks: More Efficient Fork-Free Two-Round Multi-signatures · EUROCRYPT (1) 2024
Chopsticks: Fork-Free Two-Round Multi-signatures from Non-interactive Assumptions · EUROCRYPT (5) 2023
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis › public-key cryptography › digital signatures › multi-signature
two-round multi-signatures
1.422024
Toothpicks: More Efficient Fork-Free Two-Round Multi-signatures · EUROCRYPT (1) 2024
Chopsticks: Fork-Free Two-Round Multi-signatures from Non-interactive Assumptions · EUROCRYPT (5) 2023
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis › public-key cryptography › public-key encryption
identity-based encryption
1.442020
Tightly Secure Hierarchical Identity-Based Encryption · J. Cryptol. 2020
Unbounded HIBE with Tight Security · ASIACRYPT (2) 2020
Identity-Based Encryption Tightly Secure Under Chosen-Ciphertext Attacks · ASIACRYPT (2) 2018
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis › cryptographic foundations › complexity-based cryptography
fine-grained cryptography
1.432024
Non-Interactive Zero-Knowledge Proofs with Fine-Grained Security · EUROCRYPT (2) 2022
Unconditionally Secure NIZK in the Fine-Grained Setting · ASIACRYPT (2) 2022
Fine-Grained Non-interactive Key-Exchange Without Idealized Assumptions · CRYPTO (2) 2024
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis › functional encryption
attribute-based encryption
1.222023
Fine-Grained Secure Attribute-Based Encryption · J. Cryptol. 2023
Fine-Grained Secure Attribute-Based Encryption · CRYPTO (4) 2021
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation › proof systems › zero-knowledge proofs
non-interactive zero-knowledge proofs
1.122022
Non-Interactive Zero-Knowledge Proofs with Fine-Grained Security · EUROCRYPT (2) 2022
Unconditionally Secure NIZK in the Fine-Grained Setting · ASIACRYPT (2) 2022
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis › public-key cryptography › public-key encryption › identity-based encryption
hierarchical identity-based encryption
1.132020
Tightly Secure Hierarchical Identity-Based Encryption · J. Cryptol. 2020
Unbounded HIBE with Tight Security · ASIACRYPT (2) 2020
(Hierarchical) Identity-Based Encryption from Affine Message Authentication · CRYPTO (1) 2014
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis › provable security › concrete security
tightly-secure signatures
0.822021
Authenticated Key Exchange and Signatures with Tight Security in the Standard Model · CRYPTO (4) 2021
Tightly-Secure Signatures from Five-Move Identification Protocols · ASIACRYPT (3) 2017
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis › post-quantum cryptography
lattice-based cryptography
0.822023
Lattice-Based Authenticated Key Exchange with Tight Security · CRYPTO (5) 2023
Simple and More Efficient PRFs with Tight Security from LWE and Matrix-DDH · ASIACRYPT (3) 2018
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation › key exchange
forward secrecy
0.812024
Key Exchange with Tight (Full) Forward Secrecy via Key Confirmation · EUROCRYPT (6) 2024
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation › key exchange
key confirmation
0.812024
Key Exchange with Tight (Full) Forward Secrecy via Key Confirmation · EUROCRYPT (6) 2024
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation › key exchange
non-interactive key exchange
0.812024
Fine-Grained Non-interactive Key-Exchange Without Idealized Assumptions · CRYPTO (2) 2024
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation › key exchange › authenticated key exchange
password-authenticated key exchange
0.712023
A Generic Construction of Tightly Secure Password-Based Authenticated Key Exchange · ASIACRYPT (8) 2023
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis
post-quantum cryptography
0.712023
Lattice-Based Authenticated Key Exchange with Tight Security · CRYPTO (5) 2023
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis › random oracle model
quantum random oracle model
0.712023
Tighter Security for Generic Authenticated Key Exchange in the QROM · ASIACRYPT (4) 2023
Mathematical optimization
integer programming
0.712023
A Simple and Efficient Framework of Proof Systems for NP · ASIACRYPT (2) 2023
Logic in computer science
proof systems
0.712023
A Simple and Efficient Framework of Proof Systems for NP · ASIACRYPT (2) 2023
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation › key exchange › group key agreement
authenticated group key agreement
0.612022
Signed (Group) Diffie-Hellman Key Exchange with Tight Security · J. Cryptol. 2022
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation › key exchange
signed diffie-hellman
0.612022
Signed (Group) Diffie-Hellman Key Exchange with Tight Security · J. Cryptol. 2022
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis › public-key cryptography › digital signatures
identity-based signature
0.412020
Tightly Secure Hierarchical Identity-Based Encryption · J. Cryptol. 2020
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation
non-interactive assumption
0.422024
Toothpicks: More Efficient Fork-Free Two-Round Multi-signatures · EUROCRYPT (1) 2024
Chopsticks: Fork-Free Two-Round Multi-signatures from Non-interactive Assumptions · EUROCRYPT (5) 2023
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation › proof systems › zero-knowledge proofs › non-interactive zero-knowledge proofs
quasi-adaptive non-interactive zero-knowledge
0.412019
Shorter QA-NIZK and SPS with Tighter Security · ASIACRYPT (3) 2019

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

generic construction · 1.0groth–sahai proof system · 0.7adaptive partitioning technique · 0.7strong computational diffie-hellman assumption · 0.6random oracle model · 0.6naor transformation · 0.4matrix diffie-hellman assumption · 0.4pairing-based cryptography · 0.3matrix-DDH · 0.3bilinear groups · 0.3
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 Anonymity of X-Wing and Its Variants
Jiawei Bao, Jiaxin Pan 0001
PKC (4)2
2026 Generic Constructions of Compact and Tightly Selective-Opening Secure Public-Key Encryption Schemes
Jiaxin Pan 0001, Benedikt Wagner, Runzhi Zeng
J. Cryptol.1
2025 sfXHMQV: Better Efficiency and Stronger Security for Signal's Initial Handshake based on HMQV
Rune Fiedler, Felix Günther 0001, Jiaxin Pan 0001, Runzhi Zeng
CRYPTO (8)3
2024 Fine-Grained Non-interactive Key-Exchange Without Idealized Assumptions
Yuyu Wang 0001, Chuanjie Su, Jiaxin Pan 0001
CRYPTO (2)3
2024 Key Exchange with Tight (Full) Forward Secrecy via Key Confirmation
Jiaxin Pan 0001, Doreen Riepel, Runzhi Zeng
EUROCRYPT (6)1
2024 Toothpicks: More Efficient Fork-Free Two-Round Multi-signatures
Jiaxin Pan 0001, Benedikt Wagner
EUROCRYPT (1)1
2024 Generic constructions of master-key KDM secure attribute-based encryption
Jiaxin Pan 0001, Chen Qian 0002, Benedikt Wagner
Des. Codes Cryptogr.1
2023 Tighter Security for Generic Authenticated Key Exchange in the QROM
Jiaxin Pan 0001, Benedikt Wagner, Runzhi Zeng
ASIACRYPT (4)1
2023 A Generic Construction of Tightly Secure Password-Based Authenticated Key Exchange
Jiaxin Pan 0001, Runzhi Zeng
ASIACRYPT (8)1
2023 A Simple and Efficient Framework of Proof Systems for NP
Yuyu Wang 0001, Chuanjie Su, Jiaxin Pan 0001, Yu Chen 0003
ASIACRYPT (2)3
2023 Lattice-Based Authenticated Key Exchange with Tight Security
Jiaxin Pan 0001, Benedikt Wagner, Runzhi Zeng
CRYPTO (5)1
2023 Multi-user CDH Problems and the Concrete Security of NAXOS and HMQV
Eike Kiltz, Jiaxin Pan 0001, Doreen Riepel, Magnus Ringerud
CT-RSA2
2023 Chopsticks: Fork-Free Two-Round Multi-signatures from Non-interactive Assumptions
Jiaxin Pan 0001, Benedikt Wagner
EUROCRYPT (5)1
2023 Compact Structure-Preserving Signatures with Almost Tight Security
abstract
Abstract In structure-preserving cryptography, every building block shares the same bilinear groups. These groups must be generated for a specific, a priori fixed security level, and thus, it is vital that the security reduction in all involved building blocks is as tight as possible. In this work, we present the first generic construction of structure-preserving signature schemes whose reduction cost is independent of the number of signing queries. Its chosen-message security is almost tightly reduced to the chosen-plaintext security of a structure-preserving public-key encryption scheme and the security of Groth–Sahai proof system. Technically, we adapt the adaptive partitioning technique by Hofheinz (Eurocrypt 2017) to the setting of structure-preserving signature schemes. To achieve a structure-preserving scheme, our new variant of the adaptive partitioning technique relies only on generic group operations in the scheme itself. Interestingly, however, we will use non-generic operations during our security analysis. Instantiated over asymmetric bilinear groups, the security of our concrete scheme is reduced to the external Diffie–Hellman assumption with linear reduction cost in the security parameter, independently of the number of signing queries. The signatures in our schemes consist of a larger number of group elements than those in other non-tight schemes, but can be verified faster, assuming their security reduction loss is compensated by increasing the security parameter to the next standard level.
Masayuki Abe, Dennis Hofheinz, Ryo Nishimaki, Miyako Ohkubo, Jiaxin Pan 0001
J. Cryptol.5
2023 Fine-Grained Secure Attribute-Based Encryption
Yuyu Wang 0001, Jiaxin Pan 0001, Yu Chen 0003
J. Cryptol.2
2022 Compact and Tightly Selective-Opening Secure Public-key Encryption Schemes
Jiaxin Pan 0001, Runzhi Zeng
ASIACRYPT (3)1
2022 Unconditionally Secure NIZK in the Fine-Grained Setting
Yuyu Wang 0001, Jiaxin Pan 0001
ASIACRYPT (2)2
2022 Non-Interactive Zero-Knowledge Proofs with Fine-Grained Security
Yuyu Wang 0001, Jiaxin Pan 0001
EUROCRYPT (2)2
2022 Signed (Group) Diffie-Hellman Key Exchange with Tight Security
abstract
Abstract We propose the first tight security proof for the ordinary two-message signed Diffie–Hellman key exchange protocol in the random oracle model. Our proof is based on the strong computational Diffie–Hellman assumption and the multiuser security of a digital signature scheme. With our security proof, the signed DH protocol can be deployed with optimal parameters, independent of the number of users or sessions, without the need to compensate any security loss. We abstract our approach with a new notion called verifiable key exchange. In contrast to a known tight three-message variant of the signed Diffie–Hellman protocol (Gjøsteen and Jager, in: Shacham, Boldyreva (eds) CRYPTO 2018, Part II. LNCS, Springer, Heidelberg, 2018), we do not require any modification to the original protocol, and our tightness result is proven in the “Single-Bit-Guess” model which we know can be tightly composed with symmetric cryptographic primitives to establish a secure channel. Finally, we extend our approach to the group setting and construct the first tightly secure group authenticated key exchange protocol.
Jiaxin Pan 0001, Chen Qian 0002, Magnus Ringerud
J. Cryptol.1
2021 Authenticated Key Exchange and Signatures with Tight Security in the Standard Model
Shuai Han 0001, Tibor Jager, Eike Kiltz, Shengli Liu 0001, Jiaxin Pan 0001, Doreen Riepel, Sven Schäge
CRYPTO (4)5
2021 Fine-Grained Secure Attribute-Based Encryption
Yuyu Wang 0001, Jiaxin Pan 0001, Yu Chen 0003
CRYPTO (4)2
2021 Signed Diffie-Hellman Key Exchange with Tight Security
Jiaxin Pan 0001, Chen Qian 0002, Magnus Ringerud
CT-RSA1
2021 Short Identity-Based Signatures with Tight Security from Lattices
Jiaxin Pan 0001, Benedikt Wagner
PQCrypto1
2020 Unbounded HIBE with Tight Security
Roman Langrehr, Jiaxin Pan 0001
ASIACRYPT (2)2
2020 Signatures with Tight Multi-user Security from Search Assumptions
Jiaxin Pan 0001, Magnus Ringerud
ESORICS (2)1
2020 Tightly Secure Hierarchical Identity-Based Encryption
abstract
Abstract We construct the first tightly secure hierarchical identity-based encryption (HIBE) scheme based on standard assumptions, which solves an open problem from Blazy, Kiltz, and Pan (CRYPTO 2014). At the core of our constructions is a novel randomization technique that enables us to randomize user secret keys for identities with flexible length. The security reductions of previous HIBEs lose at least a factor of Q, which is the number of user secret key queries. Different to that, the security loss of our schemes is only dependent on the security parameter. Our schemes are adaptively secure based on the Matrix Diffie-Hellman assumption, which is a generalization of standard Diffie-Hellman assumptions such as k-Linear. We have two tightly secure constructions, one with constant ciphertext size, and the other with tighter security at the cost of linear ciphertext size. Among other things, our schemes imply the first tightly secure identity-based signature scheme by a variant of the Naor transformation.
Roman Langrehr, Jiaxin Pan 0001
J. Cryptol.2
2019 Shorter QA-NIZK and SPS with Tighter Security
Masayuki Abe, Charanjit S. Jutla, Miyako Ohkubo, Jiaxin Pan 0001, Arnab Roy 0001, Yuyu Wang 0001
ASIACRYPT (3)4
2019 Tightly secure signature schemes from the LWE and subset sum assumptions
Xiao Zhang 0021, Shengli Liu 0001, Jiaxin Pan 0001, Dawu Gu
Theor. Comput. Sci.3
2018 Identity-Based Encryption Tightly Secure Under Chosen-Ciphertext Attacks
Dennis Hofheinz, Dingding Jia, Jiaxin Pan 0001
ASIACRYPT (2)3
2018 Simple and More Efficient PRFs with Tight Security from LWE and Matrix-DDH
Tibor Jager, Rafael Kurek, Jiaxin Pan 0001
ASIACRYPT (3)3
2018 More Efficient (Almost) Tightly Secure Structure-Preserving Signatures
Romain Gay, Dennis Hofheinz, Lisa Kohl, Jiaxin Pan 0001
EUROCRYPT (2)4
2017 Tightly-Secure Signatures from Five-Move Identification Protocols
Eike Kiltz, Julian Loss, Jiaxin Pan 0001
ASIACRYPT (3)3
2017 Compact Structure-Preserving Signatures with Almost Tight Security
Masayuki Abe, Dennis Hofheinz, Ryo Nishimaki, Miyako Ohkubo, Jiaxin Pan 0001
CRYPTO (2)5
2016 Optimal Security Proofs for Signatures from Identification Schemes
Eike Kiltz, Daniel Masny, Jiaxin Pan 0001
CRYPTO (2)3
2016 Unified security model of authenticated key exchange with specific adversarial capabilities
abstract
The most widely accepted models in the security proofs of authenticated key exchange protocols are the Canetti–Krawczyk (CK) and extended CK models that admit different adversarial queries with ambiguities and incomparable strength. It is desirable to incorporate specific and powerful adversarial queries into a single unified security model and establish a more practical oriented security notion. Concerning the security of one‐round implicitly authenticated Diffie–Hellman (DH) key exchange protocols, the authors present a unified security model that has many advantages over the previous ones. In the model, a system environment is set up, all of adversarial queries are practically interpreted and definitely characterised through physical environment, and some rigorous rules of secret leakage are also specified. To demonstrate usability of their model, a new protocol based on the OAKE protocol is proposed, which satisfies the presented strong security notion and attains high efficiency. The protocol is proven secure in random oracle model under gap DH assumption.
Weiqiang Wen, Jiaxin Pan 0001
IET Inf. Secur.3
2015 Structure-Preserving Signatures from Standard Assumptions, Revisited
Eike Kiltz, Jiaxin Pan 0001, Hoeteck Wee
CRYPTO (2)2
2014 (Hierarchical) Identity-Based Encryption from Affine Message Authentication
Olivier Blazy, Eike Kiltz, Jiaxin Pan 0001
CRYPTO (1)3
2011 Analysis and Improvement of an Authenticated Key Exchange Protocol
Jiaxin Pan 0001, Changshe Ma
ISPEC1
2011 TMQV: A Strongly eCK-Secure Diffie-Hellman Protocol without Gap Assumption
Jiaxin Pan 0001
ProvSec1
2010 Security Enhancement and Modular Treatment towards Authenticated Key Exchange
Jiaxin Pan 0001, Changshe Ma
ICICS1