Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Mohammed El-Shambakey

dblp:03/11471 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
3as first author
0since 2021 · last 2013
0000-0001-6059-5032ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 3 · 3 first-authorSoftware engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Parallel and multicore computing · 56% Embedded and real-time systems · 44%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Parallel and multicore computing › transactional memory
contention management
0.112012
STM concurrency control for embedded real-time software with tighter time bounds · DAC 2012
Embedded and real-time systems
real-time scheduling
0.112012
STM concurrency control for embedded real-time software with tighter time bounds · DAC 2012
Embedded and real-time systems › real-time scheduling
schedulability analysis
0.112012
STM concurrency control for embedded real-time software with tighter time bounds · DAC 2012
Parallel and multicore computing › transactional memory
software transactional memory
0.112012
STM concurrency control for embedded real-time software with tighter time bounds · DAC 2012
Parallel and multicore computing
parallel programming models
0.012012
STM concurrency control for embedded real-time software with tighter time bounds · DAC 2012
Parallel and multicore computing
transactional memory
0.012012
STM concurrency control for embedded real-time software with tighter time bounds · DAC 2012

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

length-based contention management · 0.1G-RMA scheduling · 0.1G-EDF scheduling · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2013 On real-time STM concurrency control for embedded software with improved schedulability
abstract
We consider software transactional memory (STM) concurrency control for embedded multicore real-time software, and present a novel contention manager for resolving transactional conflicts, called PNF. We upper bound transactional retries and task response times. Our implementation in RSTM/real-time Linux reveals that PNF yields shorter or comparable retry costs than competitors.
Mohammed El-Shambakey, Binoy Ravindran
ASP-DAC1
2013 FBLT: a real-time contention manager with improved schedulability
abstract
We consider software transactional memory (STM) concurrency control for embedded multicore real-time software, and present a novel contention manager for resolving transactional conflicts, called FBLT. We upper bound transactional retries and task response times under FBLT, and identify when FBLT has better real-time schedulability than the previous best contention manager, PNF. Our implementation in the Rochester STM framework reveals that FBLT yields shorter or comparable retry costs than competitor methods.
Mohammed El-Shambakey, Binoy Ravindran
DATE1
2012 STM concurrency control for embedded real-time software with tighter time bounds
abstract
We consider software transactional memory (STM) concurrency control for multicore real-time software, and present a novel contention manager (CM) for resolving transactional conflicts, called length-based CM (or LCM). We upper bound transactional retries and response times under LCM, when used with G-EDF and G-RMA schedulers. We identify the conditions under which LCM outperforms previous real-time STM CMs and lock-free synchronization. Our implementation and experimental studies reveal that G-EDF/LCM and G-RMA/LCM have shorter or comparable retry costs and response times than other synchronization techniques.
Mohammed El-Shambakey, Binoy Ravindran
DAC1