Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Mohammed El-Shambakey
dblp:03/11471
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
3as first author
0since 2021 · last 2013
0000-0001-6059-5032ORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Systems, architecture and hardware · 3 · 3 first-authorSoftware engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
Parallel and multicore computing · 56% Embedded and real-time systems · 44% |
Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Parallel and multicore computing › transactional memory
contention management |
0.1 | 1 | 2012 | STM concurrency control for embedded real-time software with tighter time bounds · DAC 2012 |
Embedded and real-time systems
real-time scheduling |
0.1 | 1 | 2012 | STM concurrency control for embedded real-time software with tighter time bounds · DAC 2012 |
Embedded and real-time systems › real-time scheduling
schedulability analysis |
0.1 | 1 | 2012 | STM concurrency control for embedded real-time software with tighter time bounds · DAC 2012 |
Parallel and multicore computing › transactional memory
software transactional memory |
0.1 | 1 | 2012 | STM concurrency control for embedded real-time software with tighter time bounds · DAC 2012 |
Parallel and multicore computing
parallel programming models |
0.0 | 1 | 2012 | STM concurrency control for embedded real-time software with tighter time bounds · DAC 2012 |
Parallel and multicore computing
transactional memory |
0.0 | 1 | 2012 | STM concurrency control for embedded real-time software with tighter time bounds · DAC 2012 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
length-based contention management · 0.1G-RMA scheduling · 0.1G-EDF scheduling · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 | On real-time STM concurrency control for embedded software with improved schedulabilityabstractWe consider software transactional memory (STM) concurrency control for embedded multicore real-time software, and present a novel contention manager for resolving transactional conflicts, called PNF. We upper bound transactional retries and task response times. Our implementation in RSTM/real-time Linux reveals that PNF yields shorter or comparable retry costs than competitors. Mohammed El-Shambakey, Binoy Ravindran |
ASP-DAC | 1 |
| 2013 | FBLT: a real-time contention manager with improved schedulabilityabstractWe consider software transactional memory (STM) concurrency control for embedded multicore real-time software, and present a novel contention manager for resolving transactional conflicts, called FBLT. We upper bound transactional retries and task response times under FBLT, and identify when FBLT has better real-time schedulability than the previous best contention manager, PNF. Our implementation in the Rochester STM framework reveals that FBLT yields shorter or comparable retry costs than competitor methods. Mohammed El-Shambakey, Binoy Ravindran |
DATE | 1 |
| 2012 | STM concurrency control for embedded real-time software with tighter time boundsabstractWe consider software transactional memory (STM) concurrency control for multicore real-time software, and present a novel contention manager (CM) for resolving transactional conflicts, called length-based CM (or LCM). We upper bound transactional retries and response times under LCM, when used with G-EDF and G-RMA schedulers. We identify the conditions under which LCM outperforms previous real-time STM CMs and lock-free synchronization. Our implementation and experimental studies reveal that G-EDF/LCM and G-RMA/LCM have shorter or comparable retry costs and response times than other synchronization techniques. Mohammed El-Shambakey, Binoy Ravindran |
DAC | 1 |