Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Amit Goyal 0001

dblp:03/3019-1 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
15ranked-venue papers
8as first author
0since 2021 · last 2017
0000-0002-4004-8039ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 13 · 8 first-authorDatabases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 4 · 1 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 1 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
5 papers
Information retrieval · 72% Recommender systems · 20% Data stream processing · 9%
Artificial intelligence
6 papers
Information extraction and text analysis · 33% Vision and language · 32% Image recognition and object detection · 12%
Theoretical computer science
4 papers
Algorithms and data structures · 69% Mathematical optimization · 18% Computational complexity · 13%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%

Topics — the 18 heaviest of 25, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Information retrieval › query suggestion
query auto-completion
0.522016
Towards Mobile Query Auto-Completion: An Efficient Mobile Application-Aware Approach · WWW 2016
adaQAC: Adaptive Query Auto-Completion via Implicit Negative Feedback · SIGIR 2015
Computer vision › Vision and language
image captioning
0.322016
Large Scale Retrieval and Generation of Image Descriptions · Int. J. Comput. Vis. 2016
Understanding and predicting importance in images · CVPR 2012
Bioinformatics and computational biology › genomics
toxicogenomics
0.312017
Convex Factorization Machine for Toxicogenomics Prediction · KDD 2017
Recommender systems › factorization models
factorization machines
0.312017
Convex Factorization Machine for Toxicogenomics Prediction · KDD 2017
Algorithms and data structures › data streams
streaming algorithms
0.322012
Sketch Algorithms for Estimating Point Queries in NLP · EMNLP-CoNLL 2012
Approximate Scalable Bounded Space Sketch for Large Data NLP · EMNLP 2011
Information retrieval
query understanding
0.212016
Query Understanding for Search on All Devices at WSDM 2016 · WSDM 2016
Information retrieval
query suggestion
0.212015
adaQAC: Adaptive Query Auto-Completion via Implicit Negative Feedback · SIGIR 2015
Algorithms and data structures › data streams › streaming algorithms
frequency estimation
0.112012
Sketch Algorithms for Estimating Point Queries in NLP · EMNLP-CoNLL 2012
Data stream processing
approximate counting
0.112011
Lossy Conservative Update (LCU) Sketch: Succinct Approximate Count Storage · AAAI 2011
Computational complexity › counting problems
approximate counting
0.112011
Approximate Scalable Bounded Space Sketch for Large Data NLP · EMNLP 2011
Algorithms and data structures › sketching
count-min sketch
0.112011
Lossy Conservative Update (LCU) Sketch: Succinct Approximate Count Storage · AAAI 2011
Algorithms and data structures
sketching
0.112011
Lossy Conservative Update (LCU) Sketch: Succinct Approximate Count Storage · AAAI 2011
Mathematical optimization
semidefinite programming
0.112017
Convex Factorization Machine for Toxicogenomics Prediction · KDD 2017
Mathematical optimization › regularization › low-rank regularization
trace-norm regularization
0.112017
Convex Factorization Machine for Toxicogenomics Prediction · KDD 2017
Computer vision › Vision and language
image-text retrieval
0.112016
Large Scale Retrieval and Generation of Image Descriptions · Int. J. Comput. Vis. 2016
Information retrieval
user interaction
0.112015
adaQAC: Adaptive Query Auto-Completion via Implicit Negative Feedback · SIGIR 2015
Machine learning › Graph learning
graph representation learning
0.012012
Fast Large-Scale Approximate Graph Construction for NLP · EMNLP-CoNLL 2012
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability
0.012012
Understanding and predicting importance in images · CVPR 2012

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

trace norm regularization · 0.9semidefinite programming · 0.9hazan's algorithm · 0.9convex factorization · 0.9sketching · 0.5composite objective optimization · 0.5lossy counting · 0.2deep learning · 0.2conservative update · 0.2implicit feedback modeling · 0.2semantic factors · 0.1large-scale graph construction · 0.1contextual factors · 0.1compositional factors · 0.1approximate graph construction · 0.1automatic plot unit extraction · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2017 Convex Factorization Machine for Toxicogenomics Prediction
abstract
We introduce the convex factorization machine (CFM), which is a convex variant of the widely used Factorization Machines (FMs). Specifically, we employ a linear+quadratic model and regularize the linear term with the ℓ2-regularizer and the quadratic term with the trace norm regularizer. Then, we formulate the CFM optimization as a semidefinite programming problem and propose an efficient optimization procedure with Hazan's algorithm. A key advantage of CFM over existing FMs is that it can find a globally optimal solution, while FMs may get a poor locally optimal solution since the objective function of FMs is non-convex. In addition, the proposed algorithm is simple yet effective and can be implemented easily. Finally, CFM is a general factorization method and can also be used for other factorization problems, including multi-view matrix factorization and tensor completion problems, in various domains including toxicogenomics and bioinformatics. Through synthetic and traditionally used movielens datasets, we first show that the proposed CFM achieves results competitive to FMs. We then show in a toxicogenomics prediction task that CFM predicts the toxic outcomes of a collection of drugs better than a state-of-the-art tensor factorization method.
Makoto Yamada, Wenzhao Lian, Amit Goyal 0001, Kishan Wimalawarne, Suleiman A. Khan, Samuel Kaski, Hiroshi Mamitsuka, Yi Chang 0001
KDD3
2016 Query Understanding for Search on All Devices at WSDM 2016
abstract
No abstract available.
Amit Goyal 0001, Jianfeng Gao 0001, Hongbo Deng, Yi Chang 0001
WSDM1
2016 Towards Mobile Query Auto-Completion: An Efficient Mobile Application-Aware Approach
abstract
We study the new mobile query auto-completion (QAC) problem to exploit mobile devices' exclusive signals, such as those related to mobile applications (apps). We propose AppAware, a novel QAC model using installed app and recently opened app signals to suggest queries for matching input prefixes on mobile devices. To overcome the challenge of noisy and voluminous signals, AppAware optimizes composite objectives with a lighter processing cost at a linear rate of convergence. We conduct experiments on a large commercial data set of mobile queries and apps. Installed app and recently opened app signals consistently and significantly boost the accuracy of various baseline QAC models on mobile devices.
Aston Zhang, Amit Goyal 0001, Ricardo Baeza-Yates, Yi Chang 0001, Jiawei Han 0001, Carl A. Gunter, Hongbo Deng
WWW2
2016 Large Scale Retrieval and Generation of Image Descriptions
Vicente Ordonez, Xufeng Han, Polina Kuznetsova, Girish Kulkarni, Margaret Mitchell, Kota Yamaguchi, Karl Stratos, Amit Goyal 0001, Jesse Dodge, Alyssa C. Mensch, Hal Daumé III, Alexander C. Berg, Yejin Choi 0001, Tamara L. Berg
Int. J. Comput. Vis.8
2015 adaQAC: Adaptive Query Auto-Completion via Implicit Negative Feedback
abstract
Query auto-completion (QAC) facilitates user query composition by suggesting queries given query prefix inputs. In 2014, global users of Yahoo! Search saved more than 50% keystrokes when submitting English queries by selecting suggestions of QAC. Users' preference of queries can be inferred during user-QAC interactions, such as dwelling on suggestion lists for a long time without selecting query suggestions ranked at the top. However, the wealth of such implicit negative feedback has not been exploited for designing QAC models. Most existing QAC models rank suggested queries for given prefixes based on certain relevance scores.
Aston Zhang, Amit Goyal 0001, Weize Kong, Hongbo Deng, Anlei Dong, Yi Chang 0001, Carl A. Gunter, Jiawei Han 0001
SIGIR2
2013 A Computational Model for Plot Units
abstract
This research revisitsplot units, which were developed in the 1980s as a conceptual knowledge structure to represent the affect states of and emotional tensions between characters in narrative stories. We present a fully automated system, called AESOP, that generates plot unit representations for narrative texts. AESOP performs four steps: affect state recognition, character identification, affect state projection, and link creation. We also identify a type of knowledge that seems to be missing from existing lexical resources: verbs that impart positive or negative polarity onto their patients (e.g., “eat” imparts negative polarity because being eaten is bad, whereas “fed” imparts positive polarity because being fed is good). We develop two techniques to automatically harvest these “patient polarity verbs” (PPVs) from a Web corpus, and show that the PPVs improve affect state recognition. Finally, we evaluate AESOP’s performance on a set of fables, and present several analyses to shed light on the capabilities and limitations of current natural language processing technology for plot unit generation.
Amit Goyal 0001, Ellen Riloff, Hal Daumé III
Comput. Intell.1
2012 Understanding and predicting importance in images
abstract
What do people care about in an image? To drive computational visual recognition toward more human-centric outputs, we need a better understanding of how people perceive and judge the importance of content in images. In this paper, we explore how a number of factors relate to human perception of importance. Proposed factors fall into 3 broad types: 1) factors related to composition, e.g. size, location, 2) factors related to semantics, e.g. category of object or scene, and 3) contextual factors related to the likelihood of attribute-object, or object-scene pairs. We explore these factors using what people describe as a proxy for importance. Finally, we build models to predict what will be described about an image given either known image content, or image content estimated automatically by recognition systems.
Alexander C. Berg, Tamara L. Berg, Hal Daumé III, Jesse Dodge, Amit Goyal 0001, Xufeng Han, Alyssa C. Mensch, Margaret Mitchell, Aneesh Sood, Karl Stratos, Kota Yamaguchi
CVPR5
2012 Midge: Generating Image Descriptions From Computer Vision Detections
Margaret Mitchell, Jesse Dodge, Amit Goyal 0001, Kota Yamaguchi, Karl Stratos, Xufeng Han, Alyssa C. Mensch, Alexander C. Berg, Tamara L. Berg, Hal Daumé III
EACL3
2012 Sketch Algorithms for Estimating Point Queries in NLP
Amit Goyal 0001, Hal Daumé III, Graham Cormode
EMNLP-CoNLL1
2012 Fast Large-Scale Approximate Graph Construction for NLP
Amit Goyal 0001, Hal Daumé III, Raul Guerra
EMNLP-CoNLL1
2012 Detecting Visual Text
Jesse Dodge, Amit Goyal 0001, Xufeng Han, Alyssa C. Mensch, Margaret Mitchell, Karl Stratos, Kota Yamaguchi, Yejin Choi 0001, Hal Daumé III, Alexander C. Berg, Tamara L. Berg
HLT-NAACL2
2011 Lossy Conservative Update (LCU) Sketch: Succinct Approximate Count Storage
abstract
In this paper, we propose a variant of the conservativeupdate Count-Min sketch to further reduce the overestimation error incurred. Inspired by ideas from lossy counting, we divide a stream of items into multiple windows, and decrement certain counts in the sketch at window boundaries. We refer to this approach as a lossy conservative update (LCU). The reduction in overestimation error of counts comes at the cost of introducing under-estimation error in counts. However, in our intrinsic evaluations, we show that the reduction in overestimation is much greater than the under-estimation error introduced by our method LCU. We apply our LCU framework to scale distributional similarity computations to web-scale corpora. We show that this technique is more efficient in terms of memory, and time, and more robust than conservative update with Count-Min (CU) sketch on this task.
Amit Goyal 0001, Hal Daumé III
AAAI1
2011 Approximate Scalable Bounded Space Sketch for Large Data NLP
Amit Goyal 0001, Hal Daumé III
EMNLP1
2010 Automatically Producing Plot Unit Representations for Narrative Text
Amit Goyal 0001, Ellen Riloff, Hal Daumé III
EMNLP1
2009 Streaming for large scale NLP: Language Modeling
Amit Goyal 0001, Hal Daumé III, Suresh Venkatasubramanian
HLT-NAACL1