Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Ido Omer
dblp:03/3405
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
4as first author
0since 2021 · last 2006
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 4 · 4 first-authorArtificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 3 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
3 papers |
Image recognition and object detection · 64% Segmentation and scene understanding · 36% | |
| Computer graphics and multimedia
3 papers |
Image and video processing · 100% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
feature similarity |
0.1 | 1 | 2006 | Image Specific Feature Similarities · ECCV (2) 2006 |
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding
image segmentation |
0.1 | 1 | 2006 | The Bottleneck Geodesic: Computing Pixel Affinity · CVPR (2) 2006 |
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection › object recognition › appearance-based object recognition
color-based object recognition |
0.0 | 1 | 2004 | Color Lines: Image Specific Color Representation · CVPR (2) 2004 |
Image and video processing › color image processing
color representation |
0.0 | 1 | 2004 | Color Lines: Image Specific Color Representation · CVPR (2) 2004 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
histogram analysis · 0.1geodesic distance · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2006 | The Bottleneck Geodesic: Computing Pixel AffinityabstractA meaningful affinity measure between pixels is essential for many computer vision and image processing applications. We propose an algorithm that works in the features’ histogram to compute image specific affinity measures. We use the observation that clusters in the feature space are typically smooth, and search for a path in the feature space between feature points that is both short and dense. Failing to find such a path indicates that the points are separated by a bottleneck in the histogram and therefore belong to different clusters. We call this new affinity measure the "Bottleneck Geodesic". Empirically we demonstrate the superior results achieved by using our affinities as opposed to those using the widely used Euclidean metric, traditional geodesics and the simple bottleneck. Ido Omer, Michael Werman |
CVPR (2) | 1 |
| 2006 | Image Specific Feature Similarities
Ido Omer, Michael Werman |
ECCV (2) | 1 |
| 2004 | Color Lines: Image Specific Color Representation
Ido Omer, Michael Werman |
CVPR (2) | 1 |
| 2004 | Using natural image properties as demosaicing hints
Ido Omer, Michael Werman |
ICIP | 1 |