Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Ido Omer

dblp:03/3405 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
4as first author
0since 2021 · last 2006
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 4 · 4 first-authorArtificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 3 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
3 papers
Image recognition and object detection · 64% Segmentation and scene understanding · 36%
Computer graphics and multimedia
3 papers
Image and video processing · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
feature similarity
0.112006
Image Specific Feature Similarities · ECCV (2) 2006
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding
image segmentation
0.112006
The Bottleneck Geodesic: Computing Pixel Affinity · CVPR (2) 2006
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection › object recognition › appearance-based object recognition
color-based object recognition
0.012004
Color Lines: Image Specific Color Representation · CVPR (2) 2004
Image and video processing › color image processing
color representation
0.012004
Color Lines: Image Specific Color Representation · CVPR (2) 2004

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

histogram analysis · 0.1geodesic distance · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2006 The Bottleneck Geodesic: Computing Pixel Affinity
abstract
A meaningful affinity measure between pixels is essential for many computer vision and image processing applications. We propose an algorithm that works in the features’ histogram to compute image specific affinity measures. We use the observation that clusters in the feature space are typically smooth, and search for a path in the feature space between feature points that is both short and dense. Failing to find such a path indicates that the points are separated by a bottleneck in the histogram and therefore belong to different clusters. We call this new affinity measure the "Bottleneck Geodesic". Empirically we demonstrate the superior results achieved by using our affinities as opposed to those using the widely used Euclidean metric, traditional geodesics and the simple bottleneck.
Ido Omer, Michael Werman
CVPR (2)1
2006 Image Specific Feature Similarities
Ido Omer, Michael Werman
ECCV (2)1
2004 Color Lines: Image Specific Color Representation
Ido Omer, Michael Werman
CVPR (2)1
2004 Using natural image properties as demosaicing hints
Ido Omer, Michael Werman
ICIP1