Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Zizhuo Wang 0001
dblp:03/5785-1
· DBLP profile ↗
9ranked-venue papers
0as first author
4since 2021 · last 2024
0000-0003-0828-7280ORCID · verified
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 1 since 2021Theory of computation · 3 · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 3 · 3 since 2021Computer networks · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Theoretical computer science
3 papers |
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design · 61% Mathematical optimization · 25% Computational complexity · 13% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Computational finance and economics · 100% | |
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Optimization for machine learning · 100% |
Topics — the 8 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design
market design |
0.7 | 2 | 2022 | Price Interpretability of Prediction Markets: A Convergence Analysis · EC 2022 A unified framework for dynamic pari-mutuel information market design · EC 2009 |
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design
prediction markets |
0.7 | 2 | 2022 | Price Interpretability of Prediction Markets: A Convergence Analysis · EC 2022 A unified framework for dynamic pari-mutuel information market design · EC 2009 |
Computational finance and economics › market design
prediction markets |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Price Interpretability of Prediction Markets: A Convergence Analysis · EC 2022 |
Mathematical optimization
sparse optimization |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Strong NP-Hardness for Sparse Optimization with Concave Penalty Functions · ICML 2017 |
Computational complexity › computational hardness
strong NP-hardness |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Strong NP-Hardness for Sparse Optimization with Concave Penalty Functions · ICML 2017 |
Mathematical optimization
convergence analysis |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | Price Interpretability of Prediction Markets: A Convergence Analysis · EC 2022 |
Mathematical optimization › continuous optimization
convex optimization |
0.1 | 1 | 2009 | A unified framework for dynamic pari-mutuel information market design · EC 2009 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
non-convex optimization |
0.1 | 1 | 2017 | Strong NP-Hardness for Sparse Optimization with Concave Penalty Functions · ICML 2017 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
market microstructure · 1.1convergence analysis · 1.1concave penalty · 0.6approximation hardness · 0.6risk minimization · 0.1convex optimization · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | LP-Based Control for Network Revenue Management Under Markovian Demands
Haixiang Lan, Guillermo Gallego 0001, Zizhuo Wang 0001, Yinyu Ye 0003 |
WINE | 3 |
| 2022 | Price Interpretability of Prediction Markets: A Convergence AnalysisabstractNo abstract available. Jianjun Gao 0001, Zizhuo Wang 0001 |
EC | 4 |
| 2022 | Revenue Management Under a Price Alert Mechanism
Zizhuo Wang 0001, Nanxi Zhang |
WINE | 2 |
| 2022 | Personalized Assortment Optimization Under Consumer Choice Models with Local Network Effects
Tong Xie, Zizhuo Wang 0001 |
WINE | 2 |
| 2020 | Probabilistic forecasting with temporal convolutional neural network
Yanfei Kang, Yixiong Chen, Zizhuo Wang 0001 |
Neurocomputing | 4 |
| 2017 | Strong NP-Hardness for Sparse Optimization with Concave Penalty FunctionsabstractConsider the regularized sparse minimization problem, which involves empirical sums of loss functions for $n$ data points (each of dimension $d$) and a nonconvex sparsity penalty. We prove that finding an $\mathcal{O}(n^{c_1}d^{c_2})$-optimal solution to the regularized sparse optimization problem is strongly NP-hard for any $c_1, c_2\in [0,1)$ such that $c_1+c_2<1$. The result applies to a broad class of loss functions and sparse penalty functions. It suggests that one cannot even approximately solve the sparse optimization problem in polynomial time, unless P $=$ NP. Dongdong Ge, Mengdi Wang 0001, Zizhuo Wang 0001, Yinyu Ye 0001 |
ICML | 4 |
| 2017 | Knapsack with variable weights satisfying linear constraints
Kameng Nip, Zizhuo Wang 0001 |
J. Glob. Optim. | 3 |
| 2012 | Non-Line-of-Sight Node Localization Based on Semi-Definite Programming in Wireless Sensor NetworksabstractAn unknown-position sensor can be localized if there are three or more anchors making time-of-arrival (TOA) measurements of a signal from it. However, the location errors can be very large due to the fact that some of the measurements are from non-line-of-sight (NLOS) paths. In this paper, a semi-definite programming (SDP) based node localization algorithm in NLOS environments is proposed for ultra-wideband (UWB) wireless sensor networks. The positions of sensors can be estimated using the distance estimates from location-aware anchors as well as other sensors. However, in the absence of line-of-sight (LOS) paths, e.g., in indoor networks, the NLOS range estimates can be significantly biased. As a result, the NLOS error can remarkably decrease the location accuracy, and it is not easy to accurately distinguish LOS from NLOS measurements. According to the information known about the prior probabilities and distributions of the NLOS errors, three different cases are introduced and the respective localization problems are addressed. Simulation results demonstrate that this algorithm achieves high location accuracy even for the case in which NLOS and LOS measurements are not identifiable. Hongyang Chen 0001, Gang Wang 0007, Zizhuo Wang 0001, Hing-Cheung So, H. Vincent Poor |
IEEE Trans. Wirel. Commun. | 3 |
| 2009 | A unified framework for dynamic pari-mutuel information market designabstractRecently, coinciding with and perhaps driving the increased popularity of prediction markets, several novel pari-mutuel mechanisms have been developed such as the logarithmic market scoring rule (LMSR), the cost-function formulation of market makers, and the sequential convex parimutuel mechanism (SCPM). In this work, we present a unified convex optimization framework which connects these seemingly unrelated models for centrally organizing contingent claims markets. The existing mechanisms can be expressed in our unified framework using classic utility functions. We also show that this framework is equivalent to a convex risk minimization model for the market maker. This facilitates a better understanding of the risk attitudes adopted by various mechanisms. The utility framework also leads to easy implementation since we can now find the useful cost function of a market maker in polynomial time through the solution of a simple convex optimization problem. Shipra Agrawal 0001, Erick Delage, Mark Peters, Zizhuo Wang 0001, Yinyu Ye 0001 |
EC | 4 |