Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Malte Gabsdil

dblp:03/6805 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2004
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Speech recognition and synthesis · 33% Question answering and dialogue systems · 33% Image recognition and object detection · 33%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Speech recognition and synthesis
automatic speech recognition
0.012004
Combining Acoustic and Pragmatic Features to Predict Recognition Performance in Spoken Dialogue Systems · ACL 2004
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection › object recognition
context-based recognition
0.012004
Combining Acoustic and Pragmatic Features to Predict Recognition Performance in Spoken Dialogue Systems · ACL 2004
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems
spoken dialogue systems
0.012004
Combining Acoustic and Pragmatic Features to Predict Recognition Performance in Spoken Dialogue Systems · ACL 2004

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

pragmatic plausibility features · 0.0machine learning · 0.0acoustic confidence features · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2004 Combining Acoustic and Pragmatic Features to Predict Recognition Performance in Spoken Dialogue Systems
abstract
We use machine learners trained on a combination of acoustic confidence and pragmatic plausibility features computed from dialogue context to predict the accuracy of incoming n-best recognition hypotheses to a spoken dialogue system. Our best results show a 25% weighted f-score improvement over a baseline system that implements a "grammar-switching" approach to context-sensitive speech recognition.
Malte Gabsdil, Oliver Lemon
ACL1
2002 Natural Language and Inference in a Computer Game
Malte Gabsdil, Alexander Koller, Kristina Striegnitz
COLING1