Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Zhexing Deng

dblp:04/10236 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2011
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Security and privacy · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer networks
1 paper
Optical networks · 50% Cellular and mobile networks · 50%
Network and information security
1 paper
Network security · 50% Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis · 50%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Cellular and mobile networks › cellular network security
physical-layer attack
0.112011
Optical Layer Security in Fiber-Optic Networks · IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur. 2011
Optical networks › optical communication systems
secure optical communication
0.112011
Optical Layer Security in Fiber-Optic Networks · IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur. 2011
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis › encryption › image encryption
optical encryption
0.112011
Optical Layer Security in Fiber-Optic Networks · IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur. 2011
Network security › wireless network security
physical layer security
0.112011
Optical Layer Security in Fiber-Optic Networks · IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur. 2011

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

optical steganography · 0.2optical code-division multiple access · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2011 Optical Layer Security in Fiber-Optic Networks
abstract
The physical layer of an optical network is vulnerable to a variety of attacks, including jamming, physical infrastructure attacks, eavesdropping, and interception. As the demand for network capacity grows dramatically, the issue of securing the physical layer of optical network cannot be overlooked. In this survey paper, we discuss the security threats in an optical network as well as present several existing optical techniques to improve the security. In the first part of this paper, we discuss various types of security threats that could appear in the optical layer of an optical network, including jamming, physical infrastructure attacks, eavesdropping, and interception. Intensive research has focused on improving optical network security, in the above specific areas. Real-time processing of the optical signal is essential in order to integrate security functionality at the physical layer while not undermining the true value of optical communications, which is its speed. Optical layer security benefits from the unique properties of optical processing-instantaneous response, broadband operation, electromagnetic immunity, compactness, and low latency. In the second part of this paper, various defenses against the security threats outlined in this paper are discussed, including optical encryption, optical code-division multiple access (CDMA) confidentiality, self-healing survivable optical rings, anti-jamming, and optical steganography.
Mable P. Fok, Zhexing Deng, Paul R. Prucnal
IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur.3